willowthewisp wrote: » If it wasn't an advantage, why would constello kick it away?
BENDYBINN wrote: » Because it was there! Doh
seligehgit wrote: » Obviously allows him to get his kick away quicker.
The Talking Bread wrote: » As I said, in my earlier post not *rsed getting into a silly tit for tat all evening with someone about it, especially someone with such a bizarre approach to what happened so that was my way to end this before it gets into a nonsensical argument for the sake of argument. So what else do you want me to do?
The Talking Bread wrote: » My main point is the hypocrisy. It isn't even about trying to damn Costello. I stated this already when I initially brought up the Costello thing. (Link......... http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=104719171&postcount=3105) Whereas Keegan's name has been torn asunder, causing the match thread to be closed because some of the by the posters here calling him all sort of names, the media and former players wasting articles on the GPS incident when they should be celebrating the game itself, ..................yet not a word was said about this incident and when it is gathering a bit of proper attention now, you won't hear any of the "outraged" critics of the Keegan incident at least offering some sort of acknowledgement to the antics of the Dub players in those last 4 minutes. Literally grabbing the closest man and jumping on him off the ball to stop him participating in the most crucial minute or two this whole Championship. At least accept their is a level of parity in gamesmanship and my point is what Costello, Kilkenny et al done in those last few minutes may have been the winning of the game for them. But, what can you do. I doubt Keegan will care to be honest if he gets a few games ban at this stage. Yet people just want him banned to punish him? You certainly can't damn one incident and completely defend the other I don't see any Mayo fan saying what Keegan done wasn't "wrong", but it was merely understandable why he done it and, owing to human nature and what was on the line, completely defaming his character (as was the case with some posters here and, indeed with a little help from the clickbait media) seems outrageous, in itself. And that outrageousness is only exacerbated by people casting aside Dublin's antics as if they are, in themselves, ok
BENDYBINN wrote: » What advantage was it for clarke to have the tee in position before the free was taken?. He had to bring the ball there anyway just as easy bring the tee with him. Daft.
Needles73 wrote: » If you cannot see the advantage there wouldn't be any point in trying to explain it. Surely it's obvious?
The Talking Bread wrote: » Literally grabbing the closest man and jumping on him off the ball to stop him participating in the most crucial minute or two this whole Championship.
Stoner wrote: » loads of tickets for the ladies final left over in work, nobody wants them
Deleted User wrote: Unfortunate to see that. 34,000 at last years finals. Pressure on the Dubs in this one I suspect. They've lost the last 3 finals to Cork.
The Talking Bread wrote: » http://amp.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/sport/footage-emerges-of-dublin-forward-interfering-with-mayo-goalkeepers-kicking-tees-before-last-kick-out-806672.html I actually think this was worse than Keegans incident the more I look at it which I am not in the mood to get into a childish silly tit for tat about if you disagree or it suits you to disagree . Not a word about it barely compared to Keegans which makes it all the worse.
kilns wrote: » Goalkeepers are not allowed leave kicking tees placed out the field. So the first tee should not have been there in the first place. If you are honest, if Mayo just scored a point to go one up with a minute to go and a mayo player didnt do the same thing, you would be mad at him
kilns wrote: » Goalkeepers are not allowed leave kicking tees placed out the field. So the first tee should not have been there in the first place.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Unfortunate to see that. 34,000 at last years finals. Pressure on the Dubs in this one I suspect. They've lost the last 3 finals to Cork.
djPSB wrote: » Have Mayo much of a chance?
Shurimgreat wrote: » If a player can steal and throw away the opposing goalkeepers tees, what's to stop one of the coaching staff doing the same when delivering instructions to their own players. Where does the stealing of tees stop? I hope the GAA make an example of Costello. On a par with the Keegan incident imo. Sportsmanship like this should have no part in the game. The GAA need to send out a strong message.
TCDStudent1 wrote: » Why was Martin carney on mid west yesterday? Where were the usual guys like John Casey and billy fitz?
blanch152 wrote: » Costello removing something from the field that shouldn't be there is a real crime. Thank God he didn't pick up Lee's GPS unit, he could have got a six-month ban for that.
blanch152 wrote: » Costello removing something from the field that shouldn't be there is a real crime.
Oldtree wrote: » What rule are You referring to?