Lindy97 wrote: » Is Lisa, Just Jordan or another one? There seems to be this notion flying about that if you say "Brand ambassador" that you don't have to # which I don't think is correct, it's what Grace got a finger wag for over that skinny tea. If they're writing blogs, a simple spell/grammar check in Word should sort out any issues but I don't think most of them ever bother. It's annoying and lazy. Writing is part of your job but yes if you point it out, you're labelled a bully.
muggles wrote: Have a feeling if she was to be pulled on it she'd claim bullying and girls not being nice to one another.
anna080 wrote: » Holly Carpenter was in with that Sharlene Collins one no mention of it being an ad either. Have to say I'm finding Holly to be unpleasantly vain lately, going to have to unfollow her.
blairbear wrote: » Her entire instagram is selfie after selfie after selfie, as is her snapchat. She is really insipid. I think Sharleen was doing her make up for her new Love Lift range thingy though so it may have been a quid pro quo arrangement.
greensheep777 wrote: » Pretty sure Sue's holiday this week was at least partially paid for by Aer Lingus. She was snapping loads of pictures from the on-flight magazine and saying the products for sale were all brilliant, then she snapped the cover. It all felt a bit "product placement".
Lindy97 wrote: » Any blogger who has a genuine interest in fashion should be blogging daily on the shows and upcoming, even if they're not attending. Most just do a shop in Dundrum or take their freebies, then post pictures with affiliate links. That's nowhere near fashion blogging
ratmouse wrote: » Yeah, begging for freebies from Pretty Little Thing ahead of a holiday is not fashion blogging.
Lindy97 wrote: » Oh stop!! That "Im going on holidays, I wish I had some bikinis" or "can anyone recommend where I can get XX items of clothing" is so awful
Ray37 wrote: » MUF does this all the time, and has them on Depop about 3 mins after she lands. It's the most unattractive, tight behaviour. Plus she wears the tackiest gear, and always has it rammed up her arse. How people buy it, I have no idea. Makes me feel ill thinking about it tbh.
wendydoll wrote: » "healthy menu consultant"...what a made up job title
ratmouse wrote: » Why try to be so health conscious and yet be head to toe in fake bits?
blairbear wrote: » The "fake bits" don't adversely affect her health. Rosanna is a healthy person. She doesn't smoke, she eats a very healthy diet, works out and drinks in moderation. Having hair extensions/eyelash extensions/implants doesn't mean she isn't healthy. Fair play to her if they make her happy.
ratmouse wrote: » I can't imagine any of the fake bits having any health benefits for the body parts upon which they are, for want of a better word, placed.
blairbear wrote: » They have no health benefits but they are very rarely harmful. People hear a lot of horror stories about cosmetic surgery but if you attend reputable, qualified, experienced surgeons (which Rosanna can well afford) and not some charlatan who did a one day course in injectables or a surgeon in Turkey operating out of an unregulated clinic, then it is rare to have complications. I just believe that Rosanna is a very healthy woman and has a more balanced outlook than many other bloggers. I don't agree with a lot of her vegan dogma and certainly took grave exception to her declaration that a gluten-free diet can cure rheumatoid arthritis (!!) But I don't think that enhancing your appearance with "fake bits" is physically unhealthy. There is a whole other argument to be made regarding the psychological impact of cosmetic enhancements etc but I'm not sure that this was what was being addressed.
