Harry Angstrom wrote: » Hook does hypocrisy and ignorance far better than most. I'm amazed that Hook's listenership numbers aren't far more than the official figures, considering the huge amount listeners/supporters who've come out of the woodwork in the past few days on this thread, most of whom have never posted anything previously about his radio shows - be it The Right Hook or High Noon.
Drumpot wrote: » There is no one person or media outlet in this world immune from Hypocrisy or ignorance. I imagine you are regularly disappointed.
DickSwiveller wrote: » It's not compulsory to listen to him. I think you're looking to be annoyed.
Harry Angstrom wrote: » No, how good it is to listen to a show where he doesn't continuously denigrate cyclists even though he himself has been fined for speeding offences, or where he never misses any opportunity to have a pop at people who took a stand against water charges while conveniently ignoring the fact that his boss had skin in the game, or ranting about vaccines that he has sweet fcuk all knowledge about. I'm all for differing opinions, it's the gross hypocrisy and ignorance that I don't like.
ballsymchugh wrote: » do you really get that from the music slot? i always thought they were grand with each other, just trying to get rises and laughs where George thinks anything before the mid 80s is probably shyte, and Bill using the slot to show him he's wrong. May have been overly nice today, but i wouldn't have said he *wasn't* nice before.
Vorenus400 wrote: » If you listened to the show today then you would have heard the essential song section. I cant remember the last time George was that nice to Bill hughes. Usually (for show) he is argumentative and puts down everthing bill says but today he was very cordial. Also seems to have put more research into the show and discussion
DeadHand wrote: » Ah yes, how good it is to go through your day without having to confront anything so upsetting as a different opinion.
quintana76 wrote: » See what RTE did by bringing on Quinn with Coppinger. It is obvious that in certain circles (RTE, IT) Quinn is portrayed as far right, (mainly because he speaks up for the RC Church). It was a subtle (not so subtle) attempt to equate opponents of the witch hunt against Hook with being right wing. It is media manipulation of opinion to their own ends. There are many others they could have brought on who did not have the same reputation thrust on to them by the media.
Larbre34 wrote: » Coppinger and David Quinn were on SOR to discuss the Hook situation earlier. Id be no fan of Quinn's faith based convictions but he said roughly what I have said about this, that you would always warn your own kids to limit the risk to themselves first and foremost. Coppinger then turned around and called him part of the problem for doing so, for perpetuating the blame culture. She actually made we want to puke, the daft wagon. In fairness to SOR he read out some text that the thought police of the 50's are now just as bad on the opposite side of the spectrum. Coppinger didnt like that one bit.
Faugheen wrote: » It wasn't a text. It was an opinion piece from Kitty Holland in the Irish Times (of all places) where I think she has spoken the most sense out of anyone.https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/george-hook-should-be-challenged-not-silenced-1.3219952?mode=amp For anyone who didn't see it.
Harry Angstrom wrote: » It's been great listening to High Noon in recent days. Contrite George is a different animal to ranting George. No outbursts about cyclists, vaccines, water charge protestors blah blah blah. He reminds me of one of those annoying little dogs who's forever chasing cars, and then one day gets a belt in the face from a wheel.
hotmail.com wrote: » If you're surprised that most people in Ireland have had one night stands at some point, then I think we get a glimpse into the minds of Hook supporters.
Bazzy wrote: » Fully Agree my original point was around victim blaming and in this instance I am the victim but they could only see it because I had clear glass so is it my fault for having clear glass. It has digressed from my original post and it is disrespectful to the original subject so I will bow out.
Bazzy wrote: » I do but its my wallet and my car presuming the car was locked what gives someone the right to help themselves ? is it my fault?
optogirl wrote: » Comparing leaving your wallet on the front seat and it getting taken to being a woman on a night out going home with one man and being raped by another. Not helpful.
Jobs OXO wrote: » Do you think it would be a better idea not to leave your wallet on the front seat perhaps?
DickSwiveller wrote: » Fantastic news. Some unexpected benefits are coming from this incident. Won't have to listen to Brute Coppinger and Richard Boiled Carrott anymore - and the alleged singer Mary Coughlan. Great stuff!