DeanAustin wrote: » However, I'd have a problem if she signed that letter to remove Hook because that then means she's completely unable to have a rational discussion on some of the points Hook made.
jooksavage wrote: » Comments like that though won't help Hook. This kind of stuff is all over Twitter and his most unapologetic supporters are getting cited in the media making him look like a fringe lunatic - thats not going to tilt an ongoing investigation back in his favour.
PeterTheNinth wrote: » Does anybody know the names? Is it a public petition or have they kept their names secret?
PeterTheNinth wrote: » He HAS apologised for this comments ffs. You would swear that all the holy Joe (Molloy) types on this thread never send a wrong word in their lives. He has apologised for what he said, and I think both sides have ackowledged that. The question is post apology whether he deserves to lose his job over this.
PeterTheNinth wrote: » Safe Ireland have come out and said that Hook's position is untenable.https://www.rte.ie/news/2017/0913/904317-george-hook/ So we are to read that Safe Ireland think that it is "safe" behaviour to get completely hammered and go home with somebody that you don't know. I swear, with all the statements from the different sides, this is turning in to the second civil war. :-) Brother against brother...
Kerry_2008 wrote: » Everyone excepts what hook said was wrong. He was trying to express a sentiment but went about it clumsily. But, the outrage on news talk led by the pip squeak Chris Donohue is nauseating. Chris and his former sidekick on drive had their show tank because they were a pair of PC clean shirts. I get people as outraged. But I don't think its a sackable offence. If people showed as much 'outrage' when a politician does something wrong we would be better served.
Snake Plisken wrote: » So who are the cowards who signed the letter? I'm sure there are a couple of household names Donoughue will be one. Sarah Mac another Moncrieff deffo Jonathan Healy Tom Dunne and most likely Dill. I tell you this if Pat George and Ivan left the station I would delete the channel from the car radio!
jooksavage wrote: » Correct- HE'S apologised. But the line coming from his support on social media is "he shouldnt have to apologise because he did nothing wrong".
The Specialist wrote: » And they are correct, he did nothing wrong - he articulated a thought in such a way to trigger all the snowflakes, but what he said still makes sense whether you find it tasteful or not.
jooksavage wrote: » ....aaaand round and round we go... God help Hook if NT management put any weight on the social media reaction to this.
Conservative wrote: » I'm not so sure about Tom. I doubt he's involved tbh. My hunch would be looking between 2-10pm of the pre Ivan schedule including production staff, producers and perhaps a newsreader or two in there.
Kerry_2008 wrote: » Id say you can definitely throw a few of the off the ball snowflakes like Joe Molloy and Ger Gilroy in there. It will probably be a lot of production and news staff. Even the tea lad. Definitely Chris, Sarah McEnerney, Jor Molly, Ger Gilroy, Dil, Ciara Kelly, Henry McKeean, Orla barry, (not sure about tom dunne and moncrieff)
PeterTheNinth wrote: » Fair play to Pat Kenny for not joining the mob. This certainly wont make him popular, but it's the right thing to do.http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/radio/pat-kenny-defends-decent-man-george-hook-over-controversial-rape-comments-36127451.html ^ That is exactly the sort of statement that I was expecting from his supposed friend Ciara Kelly. Instead of sticking her scalpal in his back.
jooksavage wrote: » Also, really surprised anyone thinks Moncrieff DIDN'T put his name on that letter. Again, speculation, but the way he gets dissed on here, I'm surprised.
chicken foot wrote: » I know you think you're the boss calling people "snowflakes" but it's the equivalent of wearing a Dunce Hat - you're just highlighting the absolute level of your ignorance. G Hook is an absolute knob jockey, his view of women has always been through a sexualised lens, should he be fired? I don't know,..perhaps spend a weekend at the RCC & see for himself. I think people forget the absolute horror of Rape at times. Just imagine someone physically forcing themselves INTO YOU!! Men & Women alike should be able to conjour up the sheer brutality, force and viciousness needed for this to happen. By agreeing with Hook, that you believe women shouldn't go home with a stranger, then you are placing yourself in the position of being a potential rapist too or you plan on never, ever having a one night stand yourself. As for his comments re consent in a relationship, I can't even go there. I don't know any husband/partner who feels he can have sex with his wife whenever he sees fit.
suicide_circus wrote: » Apologies are not enough. WE WANT BLOOD.
DeadHand wrote: » Some common sense finally breaks through the deafening clamour of hysteria and manic virtue signalling. Pat's gone way up in my estimation.