ShyMets wrote: » Rosario left the game last night in the eight inning. No word yet as to why. So fingers crossed!!
Igotadose wrote: » Bruised right index finger. Will be out for a few games. Swept by Houston. Ahh well.
ShyMets wrote: » Mets speak for half his hand is falling offðŸ˜
jack presley wrote: » And they have now officially gone insanehttps://www.si.com/mlb/2017/09/04/new-york-mets-matt-harvey-terry-collins?utm_campaign=si-mlb&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&xid=socialflow_twitter_si
ShyMets wrote: » Do I laugh. Do I cry. Do I hit the Redbreast 12
jack presley wrote: » All 3. But don't worry, only another few weeks and then we can move on with our lives (which in my case will be getting equally frustrated as a Washington Redskins supporter!).
Igotadose wrote: » Today's Mets injury report: The following Mets will have surgery in the next few days: David Wright - Rotator Cuff TJ Rivera - Tommy John (and he's an infielder ffs!) Michael Conforto - Shoulder Josh Edgin - Knee.
jack presley wrote: » I know they're probably in cruise mode at the moment so they're probably not too worried about the 1-9 in the last 10 but the Dodgers have been beaten by Arizona the last 4 times they've played. And presuming the D'backs negotiate the wild card game, they'll be playing each other in the NLDS. Arizona certainly won't be afraid going into that series. Interesting couple of games coming up for these tonight and tomorrow.
ShyMets wrote: » They're in a bit of a slump. But based on their form to date I expect them to be a different animal come the Post Season.
boccy23 wrote: » There are certainly precedents for teams with huge win totals in the regular season falling at the first hurdle in the postseason once the pressure is reapplied. The 1988 Mets with 100 wins and the 2001 Mariners with 116 wins are two that spring to mind.
jack presley wrote: » I'm basing this on my dodgy memory as opposed to facts so maybe I'm not right but weren't they winning a lot of one run games earlier in the season? That might skew their record a bit as under normal circumstances, you'd lose a chunk of those games but they weren't so I'm thinking their record is a lot better than they actually are. Now I'm not saying they should be a 70 win team but they were on pace for 110 wins at one stage weren't they? And as said before, every team has a slump at some stage in the season and it's surprising that it's taken this long for the Dodgers to hit theirs. And as others have said, you're better off coming into October hot as opposed to winning 95 games and being cold but the Dodgers still have a few weeks to sort themselves out.
boccy23 wrote: » They have a +189 run differential, first in baseball.
ShyMets wrote: » I just feel that the Dodgers have too much quality and depth to loss to the Diamondbacks in the Post Season.
krustydoyle wrote: » So the Red Sox are in trouble for sign steeling using Apple Watches apparently
TimRiggins wrote: » Verlander debuting for the Astros tonight.
ShyMets wrote: » I just feel that the Dodgers have too much quality and depth to loss to the Diamondbacks in the Post Season. In saying that their remaining schedule in the regular season is tricky. Plenty of scope to drop a few series.
The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman wrote: » I disagree with this. The Diamondbacks are good, very good, solid hitting and they have the rotation to beat the Dodgers. You only need 3 good starters in the post season and the Diamondbacks have that and a really solid bull pen. Also they will face the Dodgers in the first round as a Wild Card , given they are in the same division it will literally come down to who performs best on the day as they are built to play against each other.
ShyMets wrote: » I don't disagree with any of that. The Diamondbacks are a good team. Much better then anticipated at the start of the season. I just think the Dodgers will have too much for them in the Post Season. But time will tell