Johnboy1951 wrote: » Why not start one if you think it would work for you?
blueser wrote: » Anyone seen those B4RN videos on youtube? It's a rural broadband scheme, in the north of England. Run by local groups, not BT, Virgin, Talk Talk or whoever. Immense speeds (700mb and higher). Why can't we do schemes like that over here? It's not like the rural north of England is awash with cash, but they seem to manage it.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Have the 150m plus free uk and Irish calls. Should be as above,first bill came in today 171.46 WTF
BarryM wrote: » That is why I asked about the price/deal, etc. I assume the €171 includes setup fees? Couldn't see it in the pic. I'd be interested in the answers to your (obvious?) query.
oscarBravo wrote: » One has been touched on already: Irish people are neurotic, bordering on psychotic, when it comes to land.
On top of that, land ownership can be very fragmented, so while a few kilometers of fibre in northern England could be run across one or maybe two farmers' land, you could be dealing with a dozen landowners here and it only takes one to say no. Another problem is backhaul. You need to be able to access properly high-speed fibre somewhere relatively close to your fibre build, and accessible fibre isn't something we have an abundance of in rural areas.
But the nail in the coffin is the NBP. It quite simply doesn't make sense to go to all the trouble and expense of building a rural fibre network when the government is going to build one in a few years anyway.
Gwynston wrote: » It seems what I was warned about a couple of weeks ago proved true for me: While we do have piping running from the pole underground to our house, the last couple of feet into the hallway uses a much narrower (20mm) conduit which he straight away said would prevent him pushing the fibre through. I did ask about getting rid of the copper wire, or using it to pull through, but he said he wasn't allowed to do that, and besides - when he gave it a yank it wasn't budging at either end, so mush be blocked or kinked somewhere. He said almost half his installs are failing for this reason - it was typical to finish phone lines this way because the thick black piping from the pole is too inflexible at the house end - and he knows because he has done it many times himself when working as a sparkie!
Use flexible duct (low friction circular 20mm ID) from the ETU to the Network Terminating Unit (NTU). This is essential to allow replacement / upgrade of telecoms cable and to provide for optic fibre cable to the home in future.
Muppets: wrote: Use flexible duct (low friction circular 20mm ID) from the ETU to the Network Terminating Unit (NTU). This is essential to allow replacement / upgrade of telecoms cable and to provide for optic fibre cable to the home in future.
rob808 wrote: » [PHP][/PHP]http://fibrerollout.ie put your Eircode and number see what result you get.
HairySalmon wrote: » I have done that and for some reason fibre is active all all houses but my own. I was just looking to see is there anybody in particular that could be contacted to discuss why my house wasn't included in the roll out and to put a time frame on things
Icyseanfitz wrote: » well im running into that 1Tb fup not a bother with my 1gig ftth never knew it existed on ordering ftth, i presumed (stupid me) that a 1gig connection would have a fup in line with the usage to be expected with a connection like that! do digiweb or pure have the same 1Tb fup?
Gwynston wrote: » After a bit of lateral thinking we came up with a possible better solution: run the fibre from the pole with the splice box back to the previous pole which is in front of the other side of our plot (with no house or trees that side) and run it from there to the other side of our house. So we're going to try that, but have to wait for another install day because they will need a lifter to get up the pole that side, as it's surrounded by uneven ground. So keeping fingers crossed...!
Gonzo wrote: » Unfortunately I reckon it will be 2 years before Eir even consider raising the FUP, and when it's raised, it will be 2tb at most. The question is who will be the first to increase the fup, it's like as if they all have a friendly agreement with each other that we're only allowed 1tb per month.
d31b0y wrote: » So, fibre is now officially 100% available to me... Only problem is, I have to run a new duct the 200 - 250 m from the main road to my house. Who should I be looking at to do that kind of work? Any builder or someone specificly in the telecoms business? Any tips on what I need to look out for? Any estimate on cost (assume 50m of tarmac to be dug up and replaced, the rest is soil / stones - it's nowhere near that much but better to over-estimate, I guess)? I get the feeling this might go on the long finger though as I am pretty happy with my Imagine LTE connection presently.
Gwynston wrote: » except to test Wifi: 50MB/s down and up standing right next to it,
Icyseanfitz wrote: » its such a joke, its like they all have an agreement to keep people unhappy at every stage of having a broadband connection :rolleyes: theres no point in paying for a 1gig connection imo (i have one) if your going to be running 50-100 over your bill every month
Pangea wrote: » Are you sure you're not using the 2.4G signal?
Peppa Cig wrote: » We have gone over 1TB a few times. Ordinary household with kids, Netflix etc. Not mad down/uploaders by any stretch. 1TB just does not suit the product - simple.
Gwynston wrote: » I was actually. Couldn't connect on 5G using my (old) Android phone. Probably need that DNSet app? Does that just fix the initial slow connection problem with some devices? So does 5G distribute better through walls etc.? I will do some more testing later with newer devices.
Gwynston wrote: » OK, so only getting this with a cat 5e cable: I think my network card maybe only supports 100MB/s, but I'm on the 300MB package, so I should be getting better than that?