DanRocksOn wrote: » The ducting I am seeing is different. Its like a white ish ducting running up the pole and left with a loop. I will post a picture later. The ducting in the picture above is appears on poles further up the road
DanRocksOn wrote: » The ducting I am seeing is different. Its like a white ish ducting running up the pole and left with a loop.
DanRocksOn wrote: » Yes. that looks like but without the black fibre. Assume they will blow the fibre thru the ducting as they work down the road. Or maybe go so far and wait for the NBP to pay for it :-(
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Dan is this similar to the ducting?
The Cush wrote: » That looks like the ducting from my exchange to the start of the fibre routes.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » I assume the distance is too far to pull or push manually so they blow it instead.
raydator wrote: » Well, I had mine installed last Saturday. Got the 1000mb Extreme connection. So running speed test every 4 hours since then with mixed results. Downstream Min Speed - 120 Mb/s Max Speed - 820 Mb/s (seen only once) Avg Speed - 410 Mb/s Upstream Min Speed - 89 Mb/s Max Speed - 99 Mb/s Avg Speed - 92 Mb/s I have Cat6e cables running to and from Eir Router and PC. Why would I be seen fluctuating speeds? The area only went live last week, so it can't be contention, could it? Unhappy paying for 1000mb and on avg never getting over half the speed expected.
raydator wrote: » Test results from the last hour.
HairySalmon wrote: » I've been looking up the roll out maps and my house falls just out of eir's fibre range by literally metres. I'm not far from the main road yet I can see houses much far can avail of it. Is there any contact that can be made to discuss the issue?
ItHurtsWhenIP wrote: » There is no Cat6e, but presumably you're using Cat5e or Cat6 so should be well able to support the Gigabit connection. Have you used a different cable (in case the first one is faulty)?
ItHurtsWhenIP wrote: » I don't recognise that speed tester. Most on here use speedtest.net so try a few of those and share the results.
frozenfrozen wrote: » can you get the proper speeds on speedtest.net just to rule out it being anything to do with your pc etc?
raydator wrote: » So I called Eir tech. I should be receiving 1000mb or close too (950 or above). As my order was only installed on Saturday it's still showing as "post complete" and therefore not completed. So I will have to wait until tomorrow and then they will be able to fault check the connection and test the speed to the router. They are happy with the current setup i.e. cable type, cable length and network card speeds.
raydator wrote: » It cost a bit more but I have cat6E running around my house. Category 6 Enhanced (6e) is an augmented specification designed to double transmission frequency to 500 MHz. By wrapping Category 6e in grounded foil shielding, full 10-Gigabit Ethernet speeds can be reached without sacrificing the max cable length of 100 meters. I have also switched to a cat5e cable run from the Eir router directly to my PC which sits no more than 12 feet away from the router and i still get between 400-500. The KN engineer told me to keep away from speedtest.net (Ookla) and any site that uses the Ookla test engine. He pointed me to https://www.measurementlab.net/tests/ndt/
Category 6e is not a standard, and is frequently misused because category 5 followed with 5e as an enhancement on category 5.
ED E wrote: » You should use iPerf to test your own cabling. Just because its 5e/6 doesnt mean its actually crimped sufficiently.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Have the 150m plus free uk and Irish calls. Should be as above,first bill came in today 171.46 WTF
raydator wrote: » Can you suggest the test to run as I have never used iPerf before? I have iPerf sitting on my laptop with iperf3 -s, and on my computer waiting to perform the test but I have never used it.
frozenfrozen wrote: » -s on one and -c 192.168.1.3 on the other replace that ip with the ip of the pc running the iperf server
D:\iperf>iperf3 -c 192.168.1.10 Connecting to host 192.168.1.10, port 5201 [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 56230 connected to 192.168.1.10 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 112 MBytes 937 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 110 MBytes 924 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 111 MBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 111 MBytes 929 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 111 MBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 937 Mbits/sec [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 935 Mbits/sec [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 935 Mbits/sec sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 935 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done.
raydator wrote: » D:\iperf>iperf3 -c 192.168.1.10 Connecting to host 192.168.1.10, port 5201 [ 4] local 192.168.1.2 port 56230 connected to 192.168.1.10 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 112 MBytes 937 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 110 MBytes 924 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 111 MBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 111 MBytes 929 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 111 MBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 937 Mbits/sec [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 935 Mbits/sec [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 935 Mbits/sec sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 935 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. Can you decode what it telling me?