sonofenoch wrote: » They won't have a clue what mma or the ufc is ......they're just all over it with ****e because they got the coverage.......if they didn't have it it wouldn't exist, bit like the CL and Euros/WC when they come around
LollipopJimmy wrote: » Has there been any ufc clips shown on sky? Possibly all sorts of copyright ****e at play
Sofiztikated wrote: » Even Dana wasn't his usual red faced self. And he forgot to introduce Conor.
xtal191 wrote: »
walshb wrote: » What's the view on Wayne McCullough? Is he bullsh1tting porkie telling? One interview he's appearing to give Conor no chance, as well as ramming it down our throats how Floyd is his buddy.. Then he's on Sky and suddenly Conor is going to win?
.ak wrote: » Great interview. One thing about Conor is how good he is with media, its amazing how someone with no formal training or screen work is such a natural at it. He's a media person's wet dream, every time he opens his mouth is a soundbite and a good one at that, and he rarely repeats himself.
Muahahaha wrote: » Anyone know the time of the weigh-ins? Also what should we expect from this referee Byrd?
Muahahaha wrote: » Thanks wonder, excellent article btw, you have a great knack for storytelling
wonderfullife wrote: » For anyone who missed it, that was an incredible interview with Chris Eubank. He literally quoted verbatim from memory the entire poems of 'If' by Rudyard Kipling and a tribute to Conor by reciting 'Invictus' by William Ernest Henley.
johnpatrick81 wrote: » Jaysus Paulie....just stop already! Standing there with his signed poster like a kid who queued up all night. Tragic.