Duke O Smiley wrote: » My parents have a TT nearly identical to that taxed, NCT'd and insured (on a classic policy) for a good bit less than that. That one is for sale a while. I don't know if theres something wrong with it, but the one my folks bought was for sale an age too. I think its just that nobody wants em.
Duke O Smiley wrote: » Yeah I've told my parents to hang onto theirs for a while yet. Early original low milers will be surely go up in value in the next while. Perhaps when they hit 20 y/o?
wonski wrote: » +1 I would rather buy this good looking tt with this budget in mind:https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/audi-tt-quattro/15872521 NCT 10/18, taxed until the end of September.
Gravelly wrote: » Would you bother though? If I was going to buy a 90's "weekend" car, it would either be a sportscar for a bit of fun, or an estate for practicality. This would just be like my everday car except less comfortable, slower, and uglier.
wonski wrote: » Tt sold now...
zerks wrote: » https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/mitsubishi-lancer-04-petrol/16366914 2004 Lancer,€950. NCT til April 2018.
Gravelly wrote: » Is a 13 year old Lancer with over 100k miles on the clock that costs over €500 a year to tax worth €950? I thought it would be pretty much unsellable at any price other than scrap value.
acronym Chilli wrote: » I'd agree €950 is high, but the car looks fairly clean/straight (if basic) and can still have some utility value.
Gravelly wrote: » Oh I'd agree it looks like fine, but if you are a buyer with only €1k to spend, would you buy a car that costs that much to tax, not to mention the fuel cost of a 1.6 over, say a 1.0? Then there's the insurance hike for it being over 10 years old. There's quite a few cars available at that budget that are under 10 years old, and have smaller engines, and I'd imagine for someone on a €1k budget, running cost would be key.
duffman3833 wrote: » i bought a €800 bangernomic simply because even tho the tax and all is higher, it works out cheaper to own over a year as there is practically no depreciation on the car comparing to buying a €10k car that will lose roughly €2k or so a year on top of running costs etc
Gravelly wrote: » There are 3 types of bangernomics drivers, the ones like you that buy them because they are cheaper to own over the long term, the ones like me that buy them because they are fun or interesting, and the people who buy them because that's all they can afford. I'm not sure a Lancer would appeal to any of them.
duffman3833 wrote: » i bought mine cause it is a hoot to drive and cheaper to run long term. Had a newer car but any time i wanted to upgrade i lost so much on deprecation so gotta love bangers
JohnBoy26 wrote: » Gearboxes were absolutely an issue on these and the chain issues can't be blamed on irish maintenance because it was a widespread issue due to poor quality. The previous model didn't have any issues with chains and there was plenty of those sold here back in the day.
Agricola wrote: » Mind me asking what year that TT is and who they have it covered with? I've a classic policy with autoline and they seem to be telling me they strictly only cover cars 20 years or older with exceptions made for "interesting" stuff. I read on here about a guy who had a 2001/02 205 GTI on a classic policy for example. I wouldn't mind picking up something like a 99/00 TT for a while and add it on, but I dunno if they'd cover it.
Kenny Logins wrote: » First Ireland were allowing me to add a TT to my classic policy, but mileage was limited to 2k.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » Out of curiosity, how is that verified? Do they take you at your word?
Gravelly wrote: » That's true, though how many buyers out there would buy a €1k Lancer if they had the choice of any other car? Maybe I'm missing some attraction of Lancers (I've never owned one). To me, a Lancer is one of the most boring cars I can think of, though as I say, I could be wrong as I've never driven one.
Duke O Smiley wrote: » Fancy pigeon needs to buy that Merc!