branie2 wrote: » Were there stands with Chick tract pamphlets there?
pjohnson wrote: » You clearly like the auld contradiction.
gizmo81 wrote: » Thanks for agreeing that religion is weakness
The_Valeyard wrote: » Do these people not have the right to congregate? Why do you want to discriminate against them? You really should learn to be more tolerant of other people's viewpoints and lifestyles.
gizmo81 wrote: » I believe in the right to protest in a democracy. I haven't seen a protest in regards to sartorial choices. But i note your sly homophobic dig and suggest you try harder.
JupiterKid wrote: » With the decline in the Catholic Church here, other religions/faiths are filling the gap. I've heard the growth of the Christian evangelical churches in the past decade has been significant. People want something to believe in and religion provides an easy fix. Also the need to be part of a group is a factor. Whilst I don't agree with religion generally, I tend to adopt a live and let live attitude. I'm a gay man myself and I know the hatred most organised religions have towards LGBT people but as long as they're not trying to actively influence social policy they should be allowed to go about their business. Your rant smacks of intolerance OP. Ironic as it is religious intolerance that you're railing against.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » I'm sure if it was loads of muslim preachers you wouldnt be giving out about his intolerance.
gizmo81 wrote: » They are basically street 'entertainers' and should be restricted like buskers. Do you believe buskers are being discriminated against?
The_Valeyard wrote: » Wha? Mental gymnastics there. Did you just assume buskers are discriminated against? What is your evidence of this? Buskers are humans and have rights!!!
Mohammed Flat Comet wrote: » I can understand the argument of them needing regulation same as buskers - but the fact buskers collect money is probably the key difference in why they need a permit. That said I have never seen the level of religious preaching referred to by the OP. It's something I see only occasionally wheras I'm falling over buskers and chuggers. I would fully support a ban on chuggers though - moreso the ones looking to sign you up rather than the ones shaking a bucket.
gizmo81 wrote: » It seems to be Saturdays on Henry Street mid-afternoon. There are some preachers other days but today was a lot in a short space.
gizmo81 wrote: » I don't believe a city should have a no go area every weekend because people are preaching on the street.
Mohammed Flat Comet wrote: » I'm there most Saturday afternoons. Never saw it.
Berserker wrote: » A no-go area, hardly? If you don't like the preachers then you are just going to have to avoid them. With the decline of traditional religion in the RoI, the RCC specifically, other churches are going to surface here to fill the void. Street healing and preaching is part and parcel of some of those faiths. The RCC here didn't take that approach, so street preaching is new to us as a city. I was walking up Thomas street last year and one of the Evangelical churches there were active on the street.
gizmo81 wrote: » I don't see why these are exempt is all, I'd like to see them restricted.
gizmo81 wrote: » They are just getting a footing now before the 8th Amendment Referendum
Are Am Eye wrote: » It was probably John 3:1 - 21. That's an old favorite. Has aged well, still a classic.
Archeron wrote: » No no. No no no no. No no no no. No no there's no limits. Very few people recognise the biblical influence in 2 Unlimiteds earlier work.
gizmo81 wrote: » Yes I do avoid town most weekends as is. I welcomed the restrictions on street performers in the last couple of years. I don't see why these are exempt is all, I'd like to see them restricted. They are just getting a footing now before the 8th Amendment Referendum
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Why do they need to be restricted? Can you not just walk past snd ignore?
gizmo81 wrote: » Because I say so! :pac: Joking. Why are there restrictions on buskers/street performers?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Because there was a suapicion that many of them were not declaring their income and were claiming social protection payments. Cllr Mannix Flynn said information is being shared with Revenue/ DSP for this reason.
gizmo81 wrote: » Nothing to do with noise and space? The new regulations ban the use of backing tracks and pre-recorded music from being played “in any circumstances” across the city and restricts the use of amplifiers and where dance troupes are allowed to perform.
gizmo81 wrote: » Nothing to do with noise and space? The new regulations ban the use of backing tracks and pre-recorded music from being played “in any circumstances” across the city and restricts the use of amplifiers and where dance troupes are allowed to perform.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/new-busking-rules-restrict-use-of-amps-and-backing-tracks-1.2742593