walshb wrote: » Paulie v Floyd. Paulie loses.. Paulie v an intermediate? 3 rds? Amateur or pro rules? Not sure what any if it has to do with anything
One for you...Conor vs. Ireland's best intermediates over 3x3...who would you pick?
Mellor wrote: » Now, if you asked how Conor would do against average/top blue/purple/brown belts in jiu jitsu. I could maybe offer an opinion
darced wrote: » This post has been deleted.
walshb wrote: » But, I will wait until next week to see just how he performs before really being sure/certain.
I will add, that I liked his bag work out earlier this week. He was getting criticised for it, but for me it looked very neat and tidy and natural.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » You speak as if that's a choice you have. lol The bag work was deliberately underplayed, not sure why you would have liked it. That you did is more a sign of how useless you think McGregor is than anything else.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » The bag work was deliberately underplayed, not sure why you would have liked it. That you did is more a sign of how useless you think McGregor is than anything else.
Gintonious wrote: » I got a laugh out of the bag work, but as you said, it was deliberately crap.
walshb wrote: » That is a little harsh. It wasn't crap to begin with, and certainly not deliberately crap. Watch it again. He has lovely fluidity, shot delivery, feet, variety, connection and a beautiful right hook.... What's your definition of proper or acceptable work on a heavy bag?
Sofiztikated wrote: » Right, who's hacked walshb!?
walshb wrote: » Not as important it seems as you being wound up by it.. Putting in nice effort as well with your replies...
Sofiztikated wrote: » I'll ask, as I've no point of reference on the jiu jitsu. Mayweather vs Average purple belt.
walshb wrote: » No no.. I have a few what could be called praising Conor posts at this stage... Relating to his bag work.. Folks need to realise that he is not a pro boxer..I would not judge his bag work thinking he is. Yet he still impressed me on the bag. Whether or not he was overplaying or underplaying or whatever, it impressed me.
Sofiztikated wrote: » After next Saturday, he will be. He'll either have a pro record of 1-0, or 0-1.
walshb wrote: » Folks need to realise that he is not a pro boxer..I would not judge his bag work thinking he is.
walshb wrote: » You do know that Conor is an MMA fighter, right? He is not and never has been a pro boxer, licensing for this bout aside.. I'll take my chances in Ireland's intermediates.. It's not me not respecting the difference between amateur and pro athletes. It's you not respecting, or having a clue between the skills of trained boxers vs. non boxers in a boxing match..
wonderfullife wrote: » The more you post the more I suspect your real name rhymes with Bax Tellerman
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Well, your perspective is that Floyd could beat him with one arm and so to be impressed by McGregor's bag work from that perspective....... is pretty meaningless tbf.
walshb wrote: » What, because I think he hasn't a prayer in the actual fight I can't praise him on anything?
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Nobody said you can't praise him, relax. I'm just pointing out the context of your praise is all.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » 3 separate rumours on fb today about the fight being cancelled. A week of being flooded with clickbait ahead
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Speaking of Paulie, you would think the guy would be taking his foot of the pedal now with the McGregor/Dana bashing but today is one of his busier days. He's unbelievable. Even Artem getting it now.......... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye0CYocuYog