Shefwedfan wrote: » Ok so I had a proper look at it today but brought the Misses with me The wife says "no" :-) So that is the end of that
hairyslug wrote: » That's got to hurt, what was her opinion it. What are you looking at now
rman2727 wrote: » This is exactly why I'm waiting for the dealers to get in the GT line demos before I show my wife. The active models are very basic looking in comparison. My wife liked the kodiaq, but I think it's extremely boring looking with no design flair at all. Would also be interested in knowing what alternatives you're looking at.
Shefwedfan wrote: » She liked the outside of it, said it looked like a Land Rover. Issues with it is down to size. I had popped the seats up yesterday and she peaked in with seat up and said no chance. No space at all left with seats up. I did convince her to wait till the seat went down but that wasn't any better In the current SMAX she can fire in our 2 prams without any issue. She wouldn't be able to do it in 5008. As she will be driving it majority of the time and I got my way with eGolf earlier this year I had to walk away. We did ask for a quote on the 1.2 petrol to see if that might change mind but I don't think so. Personally: No Sat nav on spec was a surprise, I thought it was included. Has the button which always annoys me having a button that does nothing. The console didn't seem great I pushed a few buttons and couldn't really work out what it was doing. Like I pushed radio, went to pick station and it had gone into sleep mode already....maybe it was just me.... For peoples interest it is a 4 month waiting list for delivery. It didn't matter if I went petrol/diesel so they said it would be 181 plate We went to look at Alhambra and now just putting numbers together so will probably buy that in next hour:P
Shefwedfan wrote: » We went to look at Alhambra and now just putting numbers together so will probably buy that in next hour:P
rman2727 wrote: » We went and looked at these, great idea with the auto sliding side doors, finished reasonably well but ultimately felt very van like, which the wife hated. I loved the space but the design already looks dated and I think they will phase it out shortly. Vw are releasing a longer Tiguan with 7 seats shortly, the Tiguan allspace, might be worth a look.
rman2727 wrote: » Vw are releasing a longer Tiguan with 7 seats shortly, the Tiguan allspace, might be worth a look.
grogi wrote: » Why won't you show her the 3008 and present 5008 as a demonstration how much space there is?
Gwynston wrote: » Shefwedfan and myself have been discussing the alternatives in various threads throughout this year. Back in the winter, my interest was piqued when hearing about the forthcoming Kodiaq and new 5008. Both were supposedly 7-seat SUV-alternatives to traditional MPVs. But it seems that they 5008 can bothnow be added to the list with Kodiaq, Santa Fe, X-Trail, Sorento etc. which simply aren't big enough to be viable replacements for proper MPVs. I ended up replacing my old S-Max with a new one, and Shefwedfan is now looking at an Alhambra....
Shefwedfan wrote: » It looks like direct replacement of SMAX but none in area to my liking, so we went to have a look at Alhambra and she loves it. The extra space versus the SMAX and also the integrated booster seats. I think the integrated booster seat was the winner.
Gwynston wrote: » Shefwedfan and myself have been discussing the alternatives in various threads throughout this year. Back in the winter, my interest was piqued when hearing about the forthcoming Kodiaq and new 5008. Both were supposedly 7-seat SUV-alternatives to traditional MPVs. But it seems that the 5008 can now be added to the list with Kodiaq, Santa Fe, X-Trail, Sorento etc. which simply aren't big enough to be viable replacements for proper MPVs.
Gwynston wrote: » Well I was just going by what Shefwedfan said for his purposes - I haven't looked at a new 5008 myself. I gave up waiting after dismissing the Kodiak - and all the other SUVs - because they don't offer enough width across the middle row for my purposes. So the 5008 might have been a possibility, but too late for me now.
SmithySeller wrote: » The new 5008 has more internal space than the outgoing 5008 MPV and is similar/same to the G Picasso, two MPVs that sold very well. I think this was always clear with this particular car, its a 5+2. It was widely marketed as a C Segment Compact 7 Seater.
Shefwedfan wrote: » The boot is small compared to SMAX and that is issue. We have more kids now than when we bought the SMAX so no point reducing boot space.
grogi wrote: » And you needed to see the demo car to find that out!? It was obvious from the beginning that will be the case...
Shefwedfan wrote: » Can you tell from the current pictures online how big the boot is compared to SMAX? If you can your some person...
grogi wrote: » That's not entirely true... While in 5 seat configuration the 5008 it might be spacier in the second row than the old one, in 7 seat configuration it has more-less same amount of room as the previous gen. Plus any SUV will have less headroom than its sister MPV. I can comfortably seat in the C4GP in the second row, I am touching the ceiling in the 5008.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Are you sure both cars have a 50l tank? I know I thought this on previous cars and I was going by full tank till I realized the diesel had a 70l tank compared to the petrol car. For majority of diesels and 50l tank would be small.
Peugeot claims average fuel consumption of 54.3 mpg. I managed barely half that with 32.6, although I only drove the car for just over 200 miles, so I would concede that my calculation might not be definitive.
Peugeot traditionally performs well in official fuel economy tests, and the 3008 is no exception. The most economical diesel model managed 70.6mpg, while the 1.2 petrol recorded 55mpg. Our tests were in very low mileage cars, which struggled to top 40mpg. However, we’d expect this to improve significantly with more miles on the engine, matching the likes of the Seat Ateca and Mazda CX-5.
AstraMonti wrote: » Sorry I didn't phrase it correctly. For every 50L I do, I can get around 550 with the petrol (1.6 mazda from 2007) and at least 850 on the diesel (85 1.5dCI renault 2011). I consistently get 5.2l/100 in the renault while most of the time i am close or above 9 on the mazda. I have no issues at all going with the small engine if it can provide similar numbers to the diesel in regards to range and consumption. I just can't find any concrete information. From reviews on the 3008 1.2 I saw these: And generally I 've seen that above 35 will be quite hard with the size of 5008. So far seems the 1.6 diesel makes more "sense", but going petrol I would save 2.5k plus I'd get an automatic at that price.
messermaguire wrote: » Brought my wife to look at it today. She wasn't impressed........and that is the end of my 5008 journey. She prefers the Kodiaq