Arghus wrote: » His voice grates on me too, for reasons I can't fully explain; a whingy tone. I don't know what he brings to the table in terms of insight and analysis either - he once owned a constipated dog? .
yosser hughes wrote: » It's a whiny, grating whingy tone. He has nothing to say as far as I'm concerned
lawred2 wrote: » his accent? I would consider him to be an excellent speaker. No verbal ticks nor lack of distinction either. What's so wrong with his accent?
Rumple Stillson wrote: » Not sure why my first post is about Richie Sadlier... Seems like a great guy and very funny but I don't think he adds anything as a presenter or pundit. Very shaky on RTE for the Super Cup, Duff and Kenny Cunningham outshone him. Find his accent pretty difficult to listen too also.
dulux99 wrote: » I would enjoy hearing Richie on more of the football podcasts in general. Hes a good pundit in my opinion and would probably be even better on a more free flowing format like the podcast
Beersmith wrote: » I do hate the live recording pods. Terrible quality and playing up to the audience. Only works live.
dr.kenneth noisewater wrote: » Sure the whole thing is Richie asking his mates/colleagues, expect to see Hamann/Dunphy/Given next. Dunno why they included him as a presenter/interviewer tbh, Eoin is far better at it and its another guy to pay
Ol' Donie wrote: I really like Ritchie's style, but I'd love him to get away from Ireland players a few times. We love them, and all that, but we've heard from them all loads of times.
Pter wrote: » Ah come on did you listen to the interview? If there is nothing new don't even bother with the paltry couple of questions Richie asked. But if you are going to ask, then push him when he gives a half hearted answer. He alluded to him and Roy being destined to fall out....well dig into that. Why not. You have him there. Instead Ken had to fill in the blanks after the interview.
The Davestator wrote: Do you actually think you're going to hear anything new or interesting about Saipan 15 years and thousands of interviews later?
Pter wrote: » For the story at the start of how he kept cocking up the recording, yes. To get a feel for how sound and level headed Mick is, yes. To actually find out anything interesting about Saipan that we didnt already know, no.
Hunky Monster wrote: » My David Luiz poster came this morning, that'll be going up in the bathroom.
dastardly00 wrote: » Still worth a listen though?
Pter wrote: » Bang of hero worship from the Mick McCarthy interview. I know he was stuck for time, but feel he pulled his punches on some of the Saipan questions.
corwill wrote: » Really? Hadn't heard that said of him before.
wardides wrote: » Thought the heckling bit was bonkers - some fella kept shouting Bull**** when Fowler was saying something and then shouted out about having no trophies?? Somebody should have told him to shut up.
dr.kenneth noisewater wrote: » Fowler is well known for being a d!ck behind the scenes anyway. Fairly certain the OTB lads said they'd never have him on for a live show again