Top Dog wrote: » Why oh why, when you're going to that much effort, and you have ZV plates meaning you're not going to be taxed on engine capacity, why would you put the lethargic old diesel back into it? Does not compute!
wyliecoyote1 wrote: » BMW 318 IS 97 M POWER KIT No words. Another strong contender for another thread I won't mention
wyliecoyote1 wrote: » https://www.donedeal.ie/view/16255383 BMW 318 IS 97 M POWER KIT No words. Another strong contender for another thread I won't mention
Titzon Toast wrote: » Ten grand!
James Bond Junior wrote: » You'd think he would even give it a quick Hoover to help achieve his 10k. The urge to troll is strong with this one. You could get a 6 pot in minted for a quarter of his price.
dmc17 wrote: » The engine bay looks fairly moldy too. At least he took vertical photos to save us seeing any of the car in detail
emeldc wrote: » Fair play to him. He managed to get the front of an E46 on to the body of an E36. I didn't think that was possible. What a pile of sh1te.
flatty wrote: » Dya think someone should tell him that the pictures don't support the price?
Wesser wrote: » Why is it 70k????!!!!
Titzon Toast wrote: » It is a rare and valuable car, it's an RS500. According to the description it's had £36k spent on it. I wouldn't pay £70k for it though. I'd rather one of the original ones.
ronnie3585 wrote: » £70k http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201706126356818?postcode=ls279le&model=FOCUS&onesearchad=Used&onesearchad=Nearly%20New&onesearchad=New&sort=price-desc&make=FORD&radius=1500&advertising-location=at_cars&page=1
80s Child wrote: » I just want to see what you all think or this:https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/bmw-5-series-2009/15902665 I've been looking at these now for about a month and as far as I can see, they're about 1500e over. Now, that's based on bringing one in from the UK, so after all your expenses etc, maybe 1k over. Thoughts? Edit: I realise that this isn't quite in "dreamer" territory.
rizzodun wrote: » Can't even spell McRae's name right ffs.
georgefalls wrote: » 70k..? I suppose that covers the cost of a respray..? :rolleyes: