Risteard81 wrote: » Is this the only smoke detector in the property? I ask as it isn't interconnected to anything else.
henke wrote: Ok thanks I guess it doesn't matter what brand to buy? Just hoping its straightforward to know which wire goes where. I know how to wire a standard plug but looks like here there is two blues, a white (earth?) and the brown live one.
henke wrote: » Ok thanks I guess it doesn't matter what brand to buy? Just hoping its straightforward to know which wire goes where. I know how to wire a standard plug but looks like here there is two blues, a white (earth?) and the brown live one.
Risteard81 wrote: » They must be interconnected. You should consult an Electrician to sort out the wiring. RadioLINK (Ei Electronics) might be another option, although not cheap.
Gravelly wrote: » Not if they were installed before the regulation took effect (as I'd imagine is the case here) and you do not need an electrician to connect a smoke alarm.
henke wrote: » The house is about 16 years old and I'd hazard a guess they are in since it was new.
2011 wrote: » I would suggest that it would be better to forget about finding loopholes in the regulations and interlink these detectors so that in the event of a fire there is a higher chance of survival. All devices have expired if this is the case. If replaced with the Nest detectors (combined some & carbon monoxide) as suggested by Stoner they interlink wirelessly so all they require is a neutral and live (which the OP appears to have). These are easy to install and set up (with a free app).
Gravelly wrote: » Ah, the ideal world. Interlinking wired detectors in an existing house is probably going to be a major job, not one everyone would be prepared (or able to afford) to take on.
Two nest smoke alarms would cost the OP around 7-8 times what the one replacement mains alarm he asked about would cost.
The OP asked about replacing a wired smoke alarm in an existing house, rather than proposing expensive solutions he didn't ask for, or laying guilt trips on him, why not give him a solution to his problem?
2011 wrote: If replaced with the Nest detectors (combined some & carbon monoxide) as suggested by Stoner they interlink wirelessly so all they require is a neutral and live (which the OP appears to have). These are easy to install and set up (with a free app).
henke wrote: » I am wondering would the use of a RadioLink with the following be an alternative to the Nest and a bit more cost effective, while still achieving interconnectability without wiring:https://www.eielectronics.ie/images/pdf/Ei166e_DATA_SHEET.pdf