mahoney_j wrote: » 2ft 7 in mine ,but bigger frame cow
K.G. wrote: Why the gra for 3ft centres.used to milk in a place with 3 ft and pipe out the side and milking between the legs is way a head
kowtow wrote: » In my case I just want a decent sized pit back without tearing a wall out... don't some people milk between the legs at 3ft?
kevthegaff wrote: » Will mangers prevent bullying? Also would a 24 unit be much faster than a 20? I'd hope that milking 6 or 7 rows of a 20 unit with acrs would be not much longer than an hour
K.G. wrote: » Maybe i just find the udder is presented better and less problems withpipes under cows feet.
kowtow wrote: » So if I understand you right better to stay milking between the back legs, which is what we do now at 2'6" - and what I'd prefer to keep doing at 3ft. I think it's all to do with jar / swingover position. if it's far enough back the cluster should be able to go either way at 3ft.
kowtow wrote: » kg: I know you have mangers in there, but do you think a zig zag rump rail and a straight trough would work equally well? Am a bit worried that feeding to yield will have them all racing up the inside of each other...
mahoney_j wrote: » Yes I've mangers and zig zag rail behind ,great pleasure in spring with heifers no bullying ,also 24v 20 difference would be minimal with 6/7 rows I think ,good backing gate with good cow flow in and out of parlour would be better
Keepgrowing wrote: » My experience with straight trough at 3' centres was of cows doing as they pleased. If any pressure from behind they got their front feet into the trough. I'd compromise on pit width not to have straight trough especially if as you say you're considering fty. Btw my thoughts on fty are that it feeds the milkier cow more thus creating the need to feed her more iykwim.
K.G. wrote: » Straight trough and rump rail and no major problems at 2 "6.in the spring put in a couple of more cows to squeez the heifers.have cow.flow problems but feeders should help that but the collecting yard not great.thinking of putting in circular yard with a backing gate .its to help myself but also i have two lads 11and13 and i m trying to put myself in a position where they can milk on their own as in without me
Keepgrowing wrote: » Working on that here, they're not quiete there yet plus I don't want to turn them off. When they're 14-15 I'll put them on weekends and pay them a rate, may not be the going rate though.
mahoney_j wrote: » 2 ft 7 centres ,mangers ,zig zag rail cow position pit 6 ft 4 .all Gea westfallia
Mooooo wrote: » Have mangers here with two bars in them to prevent bullying they've worked well so far I'll get a pic 2moro
mahoney_j wrote: » Pics
awaywithyou wrote: » Fine parlour... U don't freeze brand ur cows??
Mooooo wrote: » Mangers
kowtow wrote: » Love that idea - did you add the bars because they were bullying before or were they part of the manger design? The mangers themselves look long enough?
Mooooo wrote: Cows that went down in the blood gone out the road there. Hope to fcuk that's the last if it. The ones that went down in skin test had no lesions in factory
Mooooo wrote: » Cows that went down in the blood gone out the road there. Hope to fcuk that's the last if it. The ones that went down in skin test had no lesions in factory
whelan2 wrote: » We were locked up for a long time years ago. Blooded . Still had reactors. Sent a cow to the factory as a cull and she was riddled with lesions. Apparently she,was immune to the both blood and tb testing.
yewtree wrote: » Best of luck with it, as said already great sign results came back with no lesions. you would wonder about tb testing its over half the work in a lot of practices. How much progress is been made on getting rid of it? Will there always be a certain level of tb in the country