DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: The stateside slur for the Irish 'mick' (as in you stupid mick bastard, or you fcking dumb mick cnut ) comes from the North Eastern Americans initial inability to pronounce the Mc surnames.
FanadMan wrote: » Wonder if that was where the English got the same nickname for the Irish? Was called it quite a few times along with Paddy and a strange one......kaaant
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » I've been in England numerous times and have never been abused, Always treated quite well in fairness. The one and only time I ever got guff in Britain was in Holyhead Wales. I was drinking in a bar with an associate when I noticed some fat bald Taff eyeballing me. When we got up to leave the bald fat fcuk grabbed my arm as I passed him and said. "The Ferry is that way Paddy"
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » Tough folks the Japs. Had a code of honour for a warrior/soldier who was about to be captured. They were supposed to fall on their sword or put the last round into their head. This is why Allied soldiers were treated so badly in their POW Camps. Cowards in their culture.
Omackeral wrote: » Pretty sure that's considered an ethnic slur, along the lines of Paki. I know it's used when speaking about car imports but applying it to people apparently isn't the most appropriate.
New Home wrote: » What a life, poor man. It's like that chap from Nagasaki who went to Hiroshima and was there when the atomic bomb was dropped; he survived it, and went back home in time for the second bomb, which he also survived.
Quazzie wrote: » :rolleyes:
Duffy the Vampire Slayer wrote: » Oddly enough, in the Ruso-Japanese War and First World War this wasn't the case. Enemy POWs were treated remarkably well by the Japanese. The crazy old Samurai ideas of bravery were brought back in the years leading up to the Second World War.
steddyeddy wrote: » Duffy the Vampire Slayer wrote: » Oddly enough, in the Ruso-Japanese War and First World War this wasn't the case. Enemy POWs were treated remarkably well by the Japanese. The crazy old Samurai ideas of bravery were brought back in the years leading up to the Second World War. In fairness you only have to look to Unit 731 to see that they weren't always nice to POWs. A small number of inmates here were POWs but they weren't treated much better than the Chinese natives. Prisoners were dissected alive sans anaesthetic, frozen and then subjected to boiling water (guess what happens), used for grenade area of damage studies and used to determine how plague and other diseases spread. I'd cite caution if investigating my attached link, it's not kosher reading around tea time.
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » That all happened in the 30s though, Duffy is saying that under previous regimes Japanese treatment of pows was relatively good, but the culture that was fostered by the empire led to serious war crimes. The point being that it isn't an innate part of Japanese culture to regard captives as cowards deserving death, it was a product of a fascist revivalism.
steddyeddy wrote: » In fairness you only have to look to Unit 731 to see that they weren't always nice to POWs. A small number of inmates here were POWs but they weren't treated much better than the Chinese natives. Prisoners were dissected alive sans anaesthetic, frozen and then subjected to boiling water (guess what happens), used for grenade area of damage studies and used to determine how plague and other diseases spread. I'd cite caution if investigating my attached link, it's not kosher reading around tea time.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » steddyeddy wrote: » In fairness you only have to look to Unit 731 to see that they weren't always nice to POWs. A small number of inmates here were POWs but they weren't treated much better than the Chinese natives. Prisoners were dissected alive sans anaesthetic, frozen and then subjected to boiling water (guess what happens), used for grenade area of damage studies and used to determine how plague and other diseases spread. I'd cite caution if investigating my attached link, it's not kosher reading around tea time.[/QUOTEIt's very easy to blame a few individuals and assume the average person wouldn't do this. Forget Unit 73 and the German extermination camps for a moment. The Japanese army in China "lived off the land" and frequently killed civilians, cannibalism wasn't unheard of either there or on pacific islands. The ordinary Germany Army, not the SS or the Einsatzgrupp, killed off most of the Russian prisoners taken in 1941. Most of the 2.8 million deaths were before the reversal at Moscow or the US entered the war.
steddyeddy wrote: » In fairness you only have to look to Unit 731 to see that they weren't always nice to POWs. A small number of inmates here were POWs but they weren't treated much better than the Chinese natives. Prisoners were dissected alive sans anaesthetic, frozen and then subjected to boiling water (guess what happens), used for grenade area of damage studies and used to determine how plague and other diseases spread. I'd cite caution if investigating my attached link, it's not kosher reading around tea time.[/QUOTEIt's very easy to blame a few individuals and assume the average person wouldn't do this. Forget Unit 73 and the German extermination camps for a moment. The Japanese army in China "lived off the land" and frequently killed civilians, cannibalism wasn't unheard of either there or on pacific islands. The ordinary Germany Army, not the SS or the Einsatzgrupp, killed off most of the Russian prisoners taken in 1941. Most of the 2.8 million deaths were before the reversal at Moscow or the US entered the war.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » steddyeddy wrote: » In fairness you only have to look to Unit 731 to see that they weren't always nice to POWs. A small number of inmates here were POWs but they weren't treated much better than the Chinese natives. Prisoners were dissected alive sans anaesthetic, frozen and then subjected to boiling water (guess what happens), used for grenade area of damage studies and used to determine how plague and other diseases spread. I'd cite caution if investigating my attached link, it's not kosher reading around tea time.[/QUOTEIt's very easy to blame a few individuals and assume the average person wouldn't do this. Forget Unit 73 and the German extermination camps for a moment. The Japanese army in China "lived off the land" and frequently killed civilians, cannibalism wasn't unheard of either there or on pacific islands. The ordinary Germany Army, not the SS or the Einsatzgrupp, killed off most of the Russian prisoners taken in 1941. Most of the 2.8 million deaths were before the reversal at Moscow or the US entered the war. I heard that Cap. The Japanese army killed babies in China. There seemed to be a culture of atrocities towards anyone not Japanese during war time.
steddyeddy wrote: » In fairness you only have to look to Unit 731 to see that they weren't always nice to POWs.
Whispered wrote: » Absolutely harrowing to read.
Autochange wrote: » The nuns in Ireland stuffed live babies into septic tanks and got on with their day. disgusting institution.
steddyeddy wrote: » True but where's the need to bring up "Ireland is bad too" in relation to atrocities in other countrys? I'm not pinning it all on you but it's a recurring theme on Boards. It's almost like people are afraid to criticise other countries lest we forget our own dark times.
Autochange wrote: » I agree. ireland is a corrupt little backwater too. We are all aware of that.
Digital Solitude wrote: » I'd consider jap a fairly soft one.