loriexxx wrote: » http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4765134/Chilling-Black-Death-advert-kidnapped-British-model.html A very strange story and if it happened to me I don't think I would be posing outside my house.
eviltwin wrote: » Something off about it alright. They let her go because she has a child? These people are ruthless fcukers, I doubt they would care if you have ten kids, an elderly relative and a cat, you're a commodity to them nothing more.
Paddy Cow wrote: » It's like a story out of Hostel.
cml387 wrote: » Lavishly illustrated, I notice. The almost perfect Mail online story.
me_irl wrote: » Even before clicking in to the thread, I knew it was a Daily Mail article. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI
osarusan wrote: » Mail probably kidnapped her just so they could publish the article and photos.
Cubik wrote: » And the way the guy just voluntarily handed himself over? Yeah right. Classy sexy shots from the "appalled" Daily Mail I see. They don't even try to hide the lack of ****s they give. It is weird too that she is doing a couple of "less sexy" but still fairly sexy poses for the article. If the police got to clamp down on a sex trafficking ring though, excellent.
hairyslug wrote: » Good to see the mail is staying classy with those photos.
Sofiztikated wrote: » The Polish, the Muslims, the Dark Net, and a model getting her baps out. Jaysis, the Mail are going to get miles out of this.
Biggest lickspittle on boardz wrote: » Something something Daily Mail something something. [Sits back, feels smug at making predictable Daily Mail jibes.]
'A mistake was made by capturing you, especially considering you are a young mother that should have in no circumstances be lured into kidnapping. You also agreed to sneak a pre-determined set of information in to the media and we will expect to see evidence that has been done in the near future. 'Any sort of disobedience with the above will result in your elimination.'
Jesus Wept wrote: » She's not a 32a.
fullstop wrote: » It didn't say she was, said she was DD.
Cubik wrote: » Well no I actually find the "I'm so above the Daily Mail" stuff as tedious as you do at times, but there are certain things that are typical of the DM - and a story about sexual exploitation accompanied by loads of sexy pictures is one of them. It's not just the DM who'd do such a thing though of course.
Biggest lickspittle on boardz wrote: » The model is the one who put the pictures in the public domain, the DM is the medium. It's like attacking facebook or instagram for hosting the pictures. Anyway, the pictures they used are what sells this story, lets be honest. If she was 20 stone nobody would care. That's the brutal truth. And it isn't just men who will click on it either. Anyway, this story stinks of a Max Clifford style setup. I expect the full story will come out in the near future...
tomwaterford wrote: » http://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057772104/3/#post104300470