The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman wrote: » 22 to be accurate! Incredible really.
blade1 wrote: » It is. Pity he didn't beat them all in their prime.
Sweet Science wrote: » Is that even possible ?
The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman wrote: » Can add 23 to the list (technically a UFC world Champ) when he beats McGregor ... in his prime.
blade1 wrote: » Well, if he was better than them at their prime, yes.
Gintonious wrote: » So he waited is it? I never understood this argument at all. He waits for someone to go past their prime, but he also has to wait to fight them as well. How is that ever an advantage?[/quote Its virtually impossible to fight every fighter in their prime . There are weight gaps that only match over time when fighters age
Sweet Science wrote: » Its virtually impossible to fight every fighter in their prime . There are weight gaps that only match over time when fighters age
hbhook wrote: » Mosley, Cotto and of course Pacquiao. Past their prime when Floyd decided the time was right to make a deal. Those 3 weren't bad in their prime.
Sweet Science wrote: » He was calling Mosley out for years at the start of the millennium . Couldn't get the fight because he wasn't a ppv fighter which is ironic Manny isn't that straightforward . The counter argument is that all Manny had to do was take a needle for the biggest fight ever but wouldnt Cotton yeah maybe . But he was chasing the Oscar fight which ended up selling 2.5 million so who could blame him
hbhook wrote: » He's not a businessman, he's a BUSINESS man! Also, Doug Fischer has some interesting thoughts on Margz and his loaded gloves. He reckons that if it was something that had been done more than once or if the powers that be knew that Margarito was complicit then more would've been done about it. Bans, fines even jail. Then again..this is boxing.. I don't name drop these writers because I think they're infallible. I'm just letting ye know where I'm getting my info.
hbhook wrote: » I can't argue or discuss MW before Hatton because I wasn't watching. I only know about Margarito etc around 2006-2008 because I've seen it put forward so many times. The not doing business with Top Rank/Cotto works for the Pacquiao story as well though. Personally, I've always thought that maybe just maybe, Mosley got lucky with Margz. I mean, Tony's head could not have been in that fight that night. Then again I've never heard anyone say that so what do I know?
gilmour wrote: » In 2006 Margarito was the WBO champ and Baldomir the WBC. Floyd was going to earn $8million to fight either one of them, he took Baldomir mainly because he knew it was a no risk fight that would lead him into the superfight against Oscar in 2007. (Just got a flashback of Oscar getting the decision over Felix Sturm in what was one of the worst judging i've ever seen, he was beaten that night without a shadow of a doubt but got the decision because of the megafight that lay ahead) Edit: I think the Oscar/Sturm fight was earlier actually, setting him the Oscar/B-Hop showdown and not Floyd. I was a huge fan of Margarito, a true bad guy that i think the sport always needs (not the loading of gloves however:D) but Mosley was just fantastic that night, as he was against Cotto just before it, that was a really really close fight that I think i gave Shane the nod in at the time. Its funny how time changes peoples tune though, because for example that was Cotto in his prime, but Shane was finished etc
hbhook wrote: » I watched ODLH vs Sturm the other day! Oscar couldn't lose that night!! Wasn't Mosley at WW in the early 2000s when Floyd was at FW? I'm not arguing here with you by the way. I've heard that about D. Fischer before but I don't think his loaded gloves view comes into that. I was also under the impression that MW turned down a career high payday for Baldomir. Which I also watched recently.Ugh..Floyd did injure his hand though. My moderator sense is tingling!
gilmour wrote: » Ha don't worry we're not arguing, its good old boxing talk. Regarding Baldomir, he got exactly the same amount fighting him for the WBC and Ring titles than he would have if he fought big Tony - $8million. At the time i was screaming out for Floyd and Tony but looking back on it i think it would have been pretty similar to the Baldomir fight, Tony was way too slow to handle Floyd. Nonetheless, Floyd did choose to not fight him though. About Mosley, heres a clip of when Floyd brought the idea up in 2005....i think this was after Floyds fight against Henry Bruseles at 140 in Jan 2005
hbhook wrote: » That's the first time I've seen that and the tooth thing! What fight is Mosley after completing there? Definitely sounds like he wants Margarito to soften Floyd up first. Which I absolutely think he would have in a big way. Is Larry saying at the end there that if he doesn't take the MW fight 'now' he may be interfering with ODLH's plan to fight MW or Mosley the year after? If it's before Mosley and ODLH fought their both at 154. See, this is the thing for me from what I know of Gatti anyway. He fights Gatti instead of Tszyu or Freitas. Admittedly I know **** all about the latter two. I only just watched Freitas for the first time the other day. I freely admit it's mostly Doug F that mentions him avoiding those two and he makes no secret of his dislike for WW Mayweather.
hbhook wrote: » Ok I get you. So slow-mo Merchant is implying that Oscar could be blocking that potential fight as Floyd has a fight (Baldomir) in Nov 06' locked up (potentially) and the DLH fight after? That's what I'm getting anyway. As I said I can't really comment on this but I'll say that many who followed boxing around that time might say that Floyd always ended up fighting anyone but Tszyu and Freitas. ;-) He WAS vicious against Corrales and Gatti. I've heard Corrales was weight-drained. Sure there's always something. ODLH was drained against Pac. What I'm realising is that Mosley was always at a higher weight to Floyd until he came back down after the second Vargas fight. For the money I guess. MW's DLH fight was the passing of the PPV/money torch as was the DLH/Pac fight. I'm tired dude. I might have to come back to this tomorrow.