Gonzo wrote: » a road near by home has FTTH available since it went live in the area back in April, however this road has 4 splice boxes and only 3 of them are installed with the first one on the road still unconnected. The houses that are connected to this missing splitter box have been passing for months but to my knowledge can't get FTTH installed due to missing splice box. The KN enginner who originally installed my connection, said to me he has had several installs cancelled due to missing splice boxes so it's quite common.
RoYoBo wrote: » The people posting here on Boards are only a small subset of those waiting for FTTH and experiencing failed installs. I'd like to know if any person or organisation is keeping any kind of a watch on Eir regarding what looks like bogus 'live' areas. Another anomaly that needs investigation is the discrepancy between the OpenEir map with 'live' premises and the emails people here have been getting from (presumably) the same OpenEir giving a much later connection date. From what I've read here, we're talking 4-5 months ... and these are only estimates!
Gonzo wrote: » a road near by home has FTTH available since it went live in the area back in April, however this road has 4 splice boxes and only 3 of them are installed with the first one on the road still unconnected. The houses that are connected to this missing splitter box have been passing for months but to my knowledge can't get FTTH installed due to missing splice box.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Possibly but as far as I am aware all the retail operators, including eir retail, get their live premises in weekly prequal files from Openeir. Unless something is going badly wrong in eir retail I'm not sure how they could be selling to houses that are not live. garroff as a test could you go through the order process with Digiweb and Pure Telecom and see if they also say your premises is live? If it is not too much trouble of course.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » Is it not more likely that eir retail are the culprits ....... through incompetence or design? Openeir seem to be providing accurate information to those who contact them ..... that is my impression from posts here.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » I think it's a bit unfair to blame the customer in this instance. They are caught between two arm of eir and should not be exposed to such incompetence. I wonder though is there something more sinister at play here. The Department still have not publicly confirmed the Q2 numbers for the rural rollout. Have Openeir released bogus APQ files to retail operators, with premises qualifying that have not been fully passed, in an effort to meet deadlines for their contract with the government?
garroff wrote: » Web site......"1000Mb is available at your location" Letter from Eir re contract And I made a mistake????
ED E wrote: » You listened to the dude at the door, brought this pain on yourself tbh.
I_HAVE_NO_NAME wrote: » Just a question. Is there any reason why OpenEir or KN would defer the roll-out in an area that was due to be live in Q2 2017? Yet at the same time they have started works on an area due for Q4 2017 / Q1 2018? Just frustrating to see everyone with fibre actually laid on the poles or in ducting when ours hasn't even started but was due for Q2... Either way Tipperary has been left in the dark on this roll-out. It'll be interesting to see when the map updates on the 10th, have OpenEir managed to pass more than 1% of the planned premises.
The Cush wrote: » The question is can open-eir encroach on these NBP intervention areas since the agreement between them and the Dept. earlier this year when the intervention map was fixed. Any further cherry-picking now would make it even less viable in these areas for anyone other than eir to win the contract.