Deleted User wrote: » I'd agree that most of the lads who retired were well into their thirties. Still, leaving en masse the way they did surprised me. I expected it to be staggered over two or three years, to allow the younger lads to "bed in" as it were. Certainly, if I were building a team, that's the way I would have tried to have it happen - younger lads being introduced to train with the experienced players, and learning from them, while still being competitive enough to play against the top teams. Instead, we have a situation where the experienced players are not being played, and the game plan leaves a lot to be desired. I can't comment on the Naomh Conaill lads, I don't know what's going on there - but I do know that RGs team building strategy is farcical, any way you look at it. Add the very questionable substitution decisions, and his comments on Donegal Daily today - and it's beginning to look very much as if he's actively pushing the old team out. If that's the case, it's not the best option for the young lads coming in, and it raises an awful lot of questions about his ability to either manage the team at all, or plan in any sensible way for the future well-being of the lads and the team. Unfortunately, if that Donegal Daily interview is any guide, he doesn't seem to have considered leaving, more's the pity - rather, he comes across as someone who blamed the players for yesterdays performance, and as if he is suggesting the experienced players should leave. That doesn't bode well, imo - and, if I were one of the Donegal players, I'd be getting very "mouthy" about his discussing retirements without having discussed it with his players first. That, alone, shows a lot about his management style - and, sadly, a complete lack of respect for his players. Any objective listener to that DD interview should be left with questions - ones that RG should be made to answer, imo.
Nidgeweasel wrote: » Never known the media to be so coy about the ability of the manager. It is bizarre, the narrative being out forward is about not pointing fingers and a young team needing time. Don't think anybody is in any doubt as to where the team is at but this doesn't mean that the manager isn't a turkey. You can still expect a lot better and at the very least a team be organised and getting the basics right- our basics are going in the other direction. The manager needs removing immediately but he won't. We'll have another 2 years of this sh*te by which stage we will have lost Karlo, Frank, Neil and Michael will be another 2 years down the line. It is pointless.
Redsoxfan wrote: » Hey, I was against the appointment of Rory Gallagher from the start, and nothing I have seen since or heard since has changed my opinion in the slightest, but some of the stuff being said here is just fodder for the high horse hacks and more suited to Facepage and the likes. Anyway. Last night was shocking. Up there with Cork 2009 and Mayo 2013 as games I was at where we were well and truly embarrassed. There was some context to both those defeats - Cork were a very good team and won the All Ireland the following year (could/should have won more) and we were coming off an All Ireland in 2013 facing a highly motivated and very good Mayo team. Galway played well last night, but we'll see how good they really are against Kerry. Fair play to them, they picked themselves up from a massive disappointment in the Connacht Final and some of their attacking play was excellent, but to be honest, they were accommodated by our own display. Like the defeat to Tyrone, we can't point fingers at any one player, it was a collective failure from back to front. Our kickouts were a disaster, defence a shambles, and attacking strategy seemed limited to trying to run Eoin McHugh down the left and win frees. Why drop O'Reilly and Thompson, both players who have started all year only to bring them on? Why start Mark McHugh who is a busted flush? Subs stinked of desperation. A few things are pretty obvious to me at least: Michael Murphy is a forward. Not a midfielder, not a corner back, not a sweeper etc. He shouldn't appear in our own 45 until we are trying to hang on to a lead. Not sure he or the manager needs to decide this, but the decision needs to be made sooner than later that he belongs primarily at full forward and we need to play to his strengths, not ask him to fill gaps elsewhere. Fine, some days there will be times where he can't get away from a Vinny Corey or two men, but we need to deal with it. Move him to half forward or use him as a decoy, anything other than what was tried this year. Sad to see him falling around in the full back line for two of the goals last night. He gives it everything but he can't be everything we need. We need a physical presence to allow Jason McGee to do his thing at midfield. I'm thinking of someone to play the role that Kevin Cassidy played once upon a time. Not sure who that is. Ciaran McGinley has been tried and returned. Caolan McGonagle and Tony McCleneghan have played that role for the underage sides. Martin McElhinney doesn't look like he has what it takes and his discipline is awful. But I am not sure that any of them is the answer. I just feel that we need that sort of player. Pretty obvious that there are serious issues without our kickouts. We are not the only County with that problem in fairness, but it's amazing that things have gone downhill so much from where they were 3-4 years ago. Granted, it took a long time for Papa to develop, but we don't seem to be making any progress since he left. I don't know if it's the keeper or the outfield players, but something needs to be done. Our defence needs to tighten up. So many bodies, so little responsibility. Lacey gave an exhibition last night of how to tackle in the short time he was on the pitch. Guys like Ward and Gallagher might be good on the ball, but they need to prove them can defend. Gillespie has had a tough year with injury after a promising 2016 so hopefully he can be what we need. Teams have also figured out that if you can drag Neil McGee out of the full back line we will struggle. He needs to hold the square. Discipline. Bad tackling followed by chat to the referee. Needs to stop. Didn't happen under McGuinness, why is it happening now? We need to have more physicality. We look weak in the tackle, going forward and defending. Some of that might be strength and conditioning, but we also need more physical players. We have too many undersized players. At least if this is the end for Frank McGlynn he got a round of applause when hauled off. We know what he has given for the jersey and he will go down as one of our greats. As for Karl Lacey, what can you say. I read that he was in tears at the final whistle (not ashamed to say I left when Paddy missed the penalty) and for me, he is the finest player I have seen in a Donegal jersey. We'll wait to hear on these two, but it's hard to see them coming back. Rory Gallagher is not the right man to develop the underage talent. Consider his record with a very talented group of Under 21s and his treatment of younger players in general. His tactics are absolute poison and his screaming and shouting and use of Maxi smack of someone who is out of his depth. He doesn't sound like he's going to quit. Will the County Board or the players do what most of the supporters seem to want? I dunno about Declan Bonner. His underage teams have done well in Ulster but have largely let down against better opposition. Pretty depressing. We don't have any right to feel we can beat the likes of Tyrone or Galway, but the performances witnessed against both were so poor, as bad as anything I can recall for a while now. We may survive in Division One if we put in a big shift in the winter, but come Championship we will probably be found out again as I don't see things getting any better next year. Tl;dr #roryout
logie110 wrote: » If county board sack him, whats the consequences?
Redsoxfan wrote: Tl;dr #roryout
Stoner wrote: You can't do a TLDR on your own post. That's for us.
Don2012 wrote: » I was chatting to somone yesterday about the game and their viewpoint on the problem being that current players and upcoming players don't want to play for Donegal anymore and would prefer playing for their clubs because when they play for Donegal they very seldom get the chance to play for their clubs. Viewpoints on this?
BonnieSituation wrote: » But the clubs don't play when Donegal plays? --- EDIT: Brendan Dennehy on OTB saying the lads have no problem with RG. Y'know.
BonnieSituation wrote: » But the clubs don't play when Donegal plays?
Deleted User wrote: Hmm. I've read a lot of comments, from different sources, and it's possible that I missed it - but I haven't heard any of the team coming out and expressing confidence in RG, either.
gooner99 wrote: » Off the ball podcast....http://offtheball.newstalk.com/player/podcasts/-/GAA_on_Off_The_Ball/199880/1/donegal_fall_flat_galway_march_on_mayo_on_the_up
babybuilder wrote: » Heard that interview. Devenny was circumspect and ambivalent. Laid the blame re poor championship on emphasis in national league. Said they'd peaked early. I don't buy that for a moment. No mention of stone age tactics. Also Devenny alluded to RG being a good coach. What have these commentators/analysts been watching these last three years? Briefly postulated Bonner should be brought in to back up RG.
doc_17 wrote: » The manager recienved an extension to his arrangement and laid out the problems we faced over the next few years. It is most unlikely that County Committee will rescind the mandate they handed him.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I don't know. I would take that interview as a very tactful criticism of Rory Gallagher. Comments about taking Declan Bonner in, something needs to change drastically, peaking during the league, we'll be sliding down the league shortly - these are all comments that could be taken as criticism of management. He went on after that to chat about the younger players, and how nobody seemed to know what they were doing - followed by the comments about another year or two of strength and conditioning being needed (which is a fair comment, and something we all knew, tbf!) The other interesting comment was "Rory Gallagher is a very good coach" - not a very good manager.All in all, I would take that as veiled criticism, tbh - but maybe I'm hearing what I want to hear? Surely it's the managers job to make sure the team don't peak too early, for instance? And it's definitely his job to make sure everyone knows what they're doing, and are motivated, even if he has to bring someone in to help motivate them. All in all, when you read between the lines, RG didn't get off scot-free in that interview, imo anyway.
PARlance wrote: » As a neutral, that's exactly what I took out of it. He obviously didn't want to slate him and he said a few things (players like him etc etc) that left me thinking that he thought he was good to have around... as a coach and not a manager.
Nidgeweasel wrote: » On the evidence of the past 3 years I don't even think they are well coached.