inforfun wrote: » Barkley is injured so will not go anywhere any time soon i reckon.
Johnmb wrote: » Not only that, but the seemingly complete and utter lack of interest in him from any other clubs might make him reconsider and sign the new contract with Everton (assuming it is still on the table).
Lucas Hood wrote: » Atletico have already signed Vitolo and loaned him out to Las Palmas. Why can't they do the same here.
HigginsJ wrote: » Not quite, they gave Vitolo the money to buy out his Sevilla contract, Vitolo then signed a 6 month contract with Las Palmas. Atletico cannot register players so would have no way to sign and loan them out.
Giggsy11 wrote: » Atletico signed Vitolo and announced on their website too, that he will be on loan at Las Palmas till Jan 1st.http://en.atleticodemadrid.com/noticias/agreement-with-vitolo-until-2022
HigginsJ wrote: » Yea, he is not on loan to Las Palmas from Atletico, they have found a way around the system. No where does it say that he is on loan from Atletico to Las Palmas. He is not registered as an Atletico player so he cannot be loaned out by them. It is a clever piece of business and needed Las Palmas and Vitolo to be on board. If they had bought Vitolo he would not have been able to go anywhere on loan.
Atlco de Madrid has reached an agreement with Vor MachPerez, Vitolo, for the next five years after the football player rescinded his contract with Sevilla Fútbol Club. Due to FIFA’s sanction that forbids the club from registering football players during the current summer market, the player will play the first half of the season with Unieportiva Las Palmas and will join our team starting on January 1st, 2018. The Spanish international has signed with our club until the 30th of June of 2022.
Lucas Hood wrote: » Load of teams loan out players right after signing them. Nothing new here.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » They don't tend to have transfer bans though...
Giggsy11 wrote: » Not sure what's so hard to understand. Obviously Atletico are banned from registering players but Vitolo is Atletico player and signed contract till 2022. He has already signed contract at Atletico, so he is Atletico player. Barca had the option to loan out Turan but they didn't. Maybe they thought training with Barca is better.
astradave wrote: Monaco have report Man City and PSG to FIFA over Mbappe apparently, they released a statement today
ERG89 wrote: » Lol. Real have probably done 10 times as much unsavoury advances towards him but after yesterday there is only one place he goes next and it ain't Paris or Manchester
Harry Palmr wrote: » Real Madrid have been named as well, the list is PSG, City, Madrid and a mystery club. Could be Liverpool - it's the sort of underhand carry on the club is now famous for! However FIFA have not received a compliant so maybe this is just a hands off warning.
Agent Coulson wrote: » I'd guess the mystery club is Arsenal unless they are the only club Monaco gave permission to hold talks with him.
highbury1913 wrote: » There was a report in France Football recently about Wenger speaking to Mbappe around the time of the France v England game and tried to convince him of the merits of joining. Unless Arsenal had permission, what Wenger did is against the rules. He also spoke to him the previous year when he was apparently at his house. Liverpool also have history of this with Van Dijk.
CSF wrote: » Lukaku > Morata. That's a discussion I'm surprised to see taking place on here but then again I probably shouldn't be.
