begbysback wrote: » On a windows operating system it is impossible to put the recycle bin into the recycle bin
cantdecide wrote: » Lindsey Buckingham (the dude singing) does both the male and female 'grunts' in Big Love. Go on and press play, shur it's been ages since yis heard it and it's good as ever :cool: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QF6xU70O73c
New Home wrote: » In a 1993 episode of Seinfeld, Elaine was dating a guy who shared a named with serial killer Joel Rifkin. She suggested to him that he change his name to O.J. like the football player. The following year O.J. was charged with double murder.
sbsquarepants wrote: » OJ was once considered for Arnies role in the original terminator film, but producers rejected him because they thought with him being the loveable cuddly superstar that he was, nobody would take him seriously as a relentless killer!
Isaiah 30:26 reads: Moreover, the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold as the light of seven days. Thus, heaven receives from the moon as much radiation as the earth does from the sun, and in addition seven times seven (forty nine) times as much as the earth does from the sun, or fifty times in all. The light we receive from the moon is one ten-thousandth of the light we receive from the sun, so we can ignore that. With these data we can compute the temperature of heaven: The radiation falling on heaven will heat it to the point where the heat lost by radiation is just equal to the heat received by radiation. In other words, heaven loses fifty times as much heat as the earth by radiation. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann fourth power law for radiation: (H/E)4 = 50where E is the absolute temperature of the earth, 300°K (273+27). This gives H the absolute temperature of heaven, as 798° absolute (525°C). The exact temperature of hell cannot be computed but it must be less than 444.6°C, the temperature at which brimstone or sulfur changes from a liquid to a gas. Revelations 21:8: But the fearful and unbelieving … shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone.” A lake of molten brimstone [sulfur] means that its temperature must be at or below the boiling point, which is 444.6°C. (Above that point, it would be a vapor, not a lake.) We have then, temperature of heaven, 525°C. Temperature of hell, less than 445°C.
Shpudnik wrote: » OJ has a parole hearing today.
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » When I first moved to America I was living in a town that recently had roundabouts put in, and I can confirm they don't know how to use them. Many people treat them like a four way stop, and nobody knows how to indicate on them. In Texas now and there's none of them, but they would really benefit, the traffic build up at lights is chronic at busy times.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » Studies have shown that converting a signalized intersection to a roundabout reduces severe crashes by 78 percent and overall crashes by 48 percent.
New Home wrote: » ...as long as people follow the rules of the road.
Candie wrote: » Earlier today someone texted me the question "Is hell endothermic or exothermic?"
sunny2004 wrote: » if they followed the rules of the road the CRASH rate would be 0% ?
Candie wrote: » Earlier today someone texted me the question "Is hell endothermic or exothermic?" A question no one can answer you'd think, but a quick google shows an urban myth circulating for decades about a question on a chemistry paper, that uses passages from the bible to plot out the physical temperature of both Heaven and Hell - with Heaven coming out as toastier than Hell: So according to the bible, it's hotter than hell in heaven. Shortly after the above was published a tongue in cheek refutation was offered but since Hell is likely to be where the most interesting people are, I like to think it's the coolest too.
The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington engineering mid term. The answer was so profound that the Professor shared it with colleagues, which is why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well. Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or Endothermic (absorbs heat)? Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law, (gas cools off when it expands and heats up when it is compressed) or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following: "First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added. This gives two possibilities: If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over. So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa Banyan during my Freshman year, "...that it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you." and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then, #2 cannot be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and will not freeze." This student received the only A.
CalamariFritti wrote: » But wouldn't you think they used actual real life tests and not some formulas or something?
Ipso wrote: » Thank god I don't receive those kind of emails any more. if the main body of the email weren't bad enough, the final sentences usually screwed the pooch.
Dramatik wrote: » A child's s got more bones than a grown-ups got
stimpson wrote: » We all know that because of: a) the milk ad from the 80's and b) this post from 3 weeks ago