hewhoscares wrote: » Paulie is getting nowhere near a 6 figure payday for a few weeks sparring. And 50-0 as a trademark is not worth 'tens of millions' - thats like the rubbish that people spout about Michael Buffer being worth $200m based him holding the 'ready to rumble' trademark - who's paying for these trademarks to accumulate these amounts. They'll get the odd rights fee and sell the odd bit of merch with it on. Not mega money.
finglashoop wrote: » The money mcgregor is spending is a pittance to what he stands to gain from this. Even if it was a glorified spar like people seem to think (i dont) mcgregor would still have a long road to be able to try and match mayweather to make it look believable. ...... For the life of me i dont know what exploit he thinks he can come up with that no boxer has tried before. Q
wonderfullife wrote: » You're right. Spending $1 million on a camp for a fight you stand to make $75 - $100 million before tax, is a drop in the bucket. But if you're not taking it seriously, why spend it? I don't understand why people are pushing these conspiracy theories, smacks to me of people getting their excuses in early in case Conor lands a bomb on his chin. As for the rest, try hit him on his chin?
wonderfullife wrote: » finglashoop wrote: » The money mcgregor is spending is a pittance to what he stands to gain from this. Even if it was a glorified spar like people seem to think (i dont) mcgregor would still have a long road to be able to try and match mayweather to make it look believable. ...... For the life of me i dont know what exploit he thinks he can come up with that no boxer has tried before. Q You're right. Spending $1 million on a camp for a fight you stand to make $75 - $100 million before tax, is a drop in the bucket. But if you're not taking it seriously, why spend it? I don't understand why people are pushing these conspiracy theories, smacks to me of people getting their excuses in early in case Conor lands a bomb on his chin. As for the rest, try hit him on his chin?
wonderfullife wrote: » hewhoscares wrote: » Paulie is getting nowhere near a 6 figure payday for a few weeks sparring. And 50-0 as a trademark is not worth 'tens of millions' - thats like the rubbish that people spout about Michael Buffer being worth $200m based him holding the 'ready to rumble' trademark - who's paying for these trademarks to accumulate these amounts. They'll get the odd rights fee and sell the odd bit of merch with it on. Not mega money. Right well you should be writing a strongly worded letter to Forbes because they put his 2014 merchandise income from "TMT" at $15 million for the year. He has trademarks on "TMT 50" and "TBE 50" too. So yeah unless Forbes are clueless, then those trademarks will be worth a fortune to him. "TBE 49-1" doesn't have the same ring to it... In fact, losing to Conor will hurt his existing TBE income. Hard to call yourself "The Best Ever" if you get flattened by an 0-0 boxer.
Gamebred wrote: » This machine couldnt land a single clean punch on Floyd (dont care if he was too young) and people are backing Conor at 4/1
walshb wrote: » The conspiracy isn't Conor in any way winning.. More Floyd allowing Conor to look somewhat competitive.. I wouldn't call that a silly feeling to have or situation to consider..
wonderfullife wrote: Going back through some of Press Tour and Floyd only lost his cool once and it was to a reporter.
wonderfullife wrote: "My name is not Floyd Mayweather Jr. My name is Floyd Joy Mayweather. I'm not no Junior".
wonderfullife wrote: If I was Conor I'd be piling on the Junior stuff every single day.
wonderfullife wrote: » The only way this "looks competitive" is if Conor lands punches on his head. So you're now saying Floyd will "allow" Conor to punch him in the face repeatedly to give some sort of illusion of competitiveness? I just don't know where to even start with some of you.
walshb wrote: » I never mentioned that Floyd allows him to punch him in the head or face He can allow Conor look competitive without allowing Conor to do any significant damage. You don't see that or believe that?
cletus wrote: » For those of us who are non boxing experts, how would we tell the difference between Conor being competitive and Floyd making Conor look like he is competitive
cletus wrote: » but what, specifically, would it look like for Floyd to actively make the fight look like McGregor is being competitive
cletus wrote: » Floyd coasting is not the same as making Conor look competitive. Floyd doing that suggests some sort of collusion.
walshb wrote: » It may suggest collusion, but it doesn't mean it has to be collusion. Floyd could simply coast and put in as much or as little effort as he wants. He is his own man, and there is no law against doing this. Conor may or may not be aware. They may or may not be in on it.... But educated fight fans and MMA fans should be able to see if Floyd is coasting and just doing what he wants....
cletus wrote: » Look, you said he can allow Conor look competitive. I contend that Floyd coasting will not be the same as Conor looking competitive. I've asked you how Floyd could make Conor look competitive. Your reply is again with regards to Floyd coasting. Would you agree that Floyd coasting would look completely different to McGregor looking competitive, because from my perspective at least, Floyd coasting through the fight would be the exact opposite of Conor looking competitive
walshb wrote: » BTW, for me there are two types of competitive. 1. Conor actually being competitive with Floyd not coasting 2. Conor being competitive due to Floyd coasting and allowing him to be competitive Bear in mind the term competitive is subjective here...
walshb wrote: » Why are you obfuscating? It's simple: Write down your definition of competitive... To me the term is subjective anyway... Let's say Floyd "coasts" and wins most of, if not all rds via 10-9. To some that could be competitive towards the non boxer, Conor.... He is in there trying, throwing and hitting parts of Floyd's body in each rd, all the while still losing the rds. That could be seen as competitive for the non boxer You are over-analysing this.... So, by coasting and the fight flowing like I suggested/described could be argued by some as Conor being competitive. Hell, if Conor makes it to 12 rds no matter what happens there will be some saying he was competitive. That is what I mean by the term being subjective. Several different examples/permutations for Conor to be deemed competitive, and argued as so.
Fiery mutant wrote: I don't often post in this thread, but that video of Canelo firing away is just a pure joy to watch. His accuracy and release of punches is something else, you can feel the power flowing through those shots, and the concentration on his face as he lets fly.
Too Tough To Die wrote: » You contradict yourself in scenario 2. If Floyd is coasting, then it's not competitive.
cletus wrote: » Just like the idea that the fight will be fixed to some degree, I think you, or anybody else, would be hard pressed to find combat fans who really believe that Floyd might in some way attempt to make Conor look better in there than he actually is
walshb wrote: » I haven't even given my verdict on Conor being competitive or not. I will on August 27, and I will break it down.
walshb wrote: » True..... I will on August 27, and I will break it down.
cletus wrote: » I'm sure we'll all wait with baited breath