D wrote: » What the importance of a 21st birthday is. Is it just another American event that been absorbed into our culture?
In the Middle Ages 21 was considered the age of adulthood because that’s when young men were capable of wearing a full suit of armor. 21 stuck until the 20th century. The need for soldiers for WWII, Korea, and Vietnam wars saw 18 years olds drafted and an outcry that they could serve their country but not vote. This led to passage of the 26th amendment lowering the voting age from 21 to 18 in 1971.
Sheepdish1 wrote: » 1) people think that children in schools with no uniforms cost parents more. It's less washing anyway and clothes don't fall apart. Also my kid is in a school with no uniform and it is less hassle and expense than using uniforms. Never any issues with bullying over clothes etc and I don't really know why people assumes this happens. Bullies will find something to bully about no matter what so uniforms / non uniforms don't make a difference. Out dated, expensive and ridiculous rule IMO....as long as there's a dress code there is no need for them
Paddy Cow wrote: It amazes me how we expect kids to grow into free thinking individuals, capable of being assertive and taking risks (I mean starting business's etc, not Jackass style risks ) while at the same time forcing them to act like lemmings.
ThisRegard wrote: » I think everyone making an argument against school uniforms are either childless, or stinking hippies. And they aren't expensive, quite cheap actually, unless the school is one of those dumb ones to insist you buy it from a selected boutique with the school crest already embroidered on it.
Faze11 wrote: » Really don't understand why they removed the word gullible from the English dictionary. I used it regularly.
Paddy Cow wrote: » I went to schools that had uniforms and ones that didn't. It was much easier not having a uniform.
ThisRegard wrote: » , or stinking hippies.
AllForIt wrote: » British Premiership football, supporting 'teams' when you don't even live or have any connection with the city the football team represents. Strictly Come Dancing. Most ppl are not into ballroom dancing so I don't see the popularity of that TV show, unlike XFactor where most ppl are actually into music/singing.
Sam Kade wrote: » I don't understand why people start silly threads asking silly questions about things they don't understand.
con___manx1 wrote: » Also saves money for parents as it prevents ware and tare of the kids own clothes .
dbagman wrote: » I work on a construction site. I have to wear a hard hat boots and a hi his vest. That's my uniform. Office workers have to wear suits. Tesco have uniforms. It's not just school kids that have to do it. I guess it's in preparation for the professional life they hope their students go on to. Or a form of discipline. You could argue we all act like lemmings. Having said that you wouldn't be sat behind a desk in a solicitors office in a pair of shorts and sandals. Or be too keen on hiring a solicitor dressed as such for that matter.
Tsipras wrote: » So do you only like Irish music? Not any of them foreign UK/USA bands you have no geographical connection to
dr.fuzzenstein wrote: » There is a difference between safety gear and a uniform. The former keeps you safe, the latter is to make you an indistinguishable worker ant amongst all the others. It says to you that your personality and individualism are irrelevant and that you are merely a tiny wheel in a machine. Faceless, of no special importance and easily replaceable. It says that your input is neither required nor desired. You simply should follow orders and not question. Tl;dr: Still glad I work in IT.
eeguy wrote: » Bit extreme there. Uniforms are used for identification, and to promote the company brand, no more no less.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Really long sums.
RobbingBandit wrote: » X + y = 2 both X and y are the same number or are they...
Paddy Cow wrote: » Uniforms can be ridiculously expensive. Some of the jumpers can be €50. You could get two whole outfits for that in Penneys.