ganmo wrote: » The price of the ewes won't buy a hogget. If any of them aren't in lamb at scanning time give them gate but I wouldn't be pushed till then
tomwaterford wrote: » Add together the factory price of the ewe and the cost of keeping them for the extra year (fert doaing etc) ,your very close to price of a good classy ewe lamb and improving your sheep overall imo
charolais0153 wrote: » Wyick question , does RaM effect work on hoggetts in their first year going to ram,?
ganmo wrote: » tomwaterford wrote: » Add together the factory price of the ewe and the cost of keeping them for the extra year (fert doaing etc) ,your very close to price of a good classy ewe lamb and improving your sheep overall imo if it was for the full year ya but we're in july
stantheman1979 wrote: » Yeah we use it with ewe lambs. All ours lambed in a month.
charolais0153 wrote: » No I'm on about ewes a year older than ewe lambs iykwim
DJ98 wrote: » Have a few ewes that are 3yr olds now, didnt go im lamb last year but didnt bother to sell them as had plenty of grass, would these be better sold and buy hoggets or is there a chance they will go in lamb this year.
A study in Athenry, by Tim Keady found that you shouldn't cull for barrenness and that you have as much chance of picking the lotto numbers as the ewes being barren again this year.
stantheman1979 wrote: » Ok sure if we're not going to cull barren ewes we won't bother putting out rams at all cos Tim Keady says so
roosky wrote: » A study in Athenry, by Tim Keady found that you shouldn't cull for barrenness and that you have as much chance of picking the lotto numbers as the ewes being barren again this year.
stantheman1979 wrote: » Any beef meetings I go to tell u to calve heifers at 22-24 months and sheep experts say to put ewe lambs in lamb to maximise output. If ewe lambs are rearing a lamb then 3yo should be also. Fair enough I take you're point she's in her prime but if she's dry she's costing money. Get rid of her and keep a ewe lamb that will do the job for her!!
MayoAreMagic wrote: » My point is, i think you have to take each case on its merits and a cull always policy can end up actually costing you even more in potential earnings. These animals will need f all minding from now til this time next year and will probably rear two strong lambs on autopilot. Let her pay back what she cost you when she is in such a good position to, then sell her.
roosky wrote: » A study in Athenry, by Tim Keady found that you shouldn't cull for barrenness and that you have as much chance of picking the lotto numbers as the ewes being barren again this year. Id hold onto them at this stage price is gone anyway for them
serfspup wrote: » I am buying a lotto ticket:D this guy is wrong there is a multitude of reasons for a ewe being barren some are temporary but lots are permanant.and I reckon about 50% will stay barren. scan here and empties out the gate.if nothing else it pays a bill. gave a pass to one two years ago she didn't lamb as a two tooth so as a three tooth she looked great and rejected her lamb:mad:
Farmer_3650 wrote: » I dosed all lambs for fluke and worms on Friday. I used a dose called Albex which I have never used before but the vet recommended it. Withdrawal period of only 4 days on it.
Lambman wrote: » Bit early for fluke yet? I Never dose for fluke till September.
Hard Knocks wrote: » Noticed a lamb with scab, was thinking of using ivomec super (recommend here). How much would you give (40kg) & how long before he could be killed