nullzero wrote: » I thought the primary function of social media was to provide a platform for ar5eholes to let their juices flow, so to speak.
Murrisk wrote: » Has anyone else seen any examples of this on social media? And do you think it's fair enough?
Murrisk wrote: » Well, I like social media a lot generally so I wouldn't really agree. It has good and bad like anything. And weirdly, most people I know who say how much they hate social media still keep social media profiles.
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » There was a great Southpark episode about yelp reviewers thinking they're important... Twas bang on
One eyed Jack wrote: » I've seen plenty of examples of it and I don't think it's ever fair. What's worse though is people giving those who spread these kinds of spiteful stories, any attention.
nullzero wrote: » Boogers and cum, brilliant tune.
Murrisk wrote: » Well, this was inspired by my friend's story and her name isn't given here. I'm starting a discussion.
Murrisk wrote: Well, this was inspired by my friend's story and her name isn't given here.
Senna wrote: » Same with all online review platforms for services and business, product reviews are slightly better. TripAdvisor is one of the worst, a perfect example was this week when I was looking for hotel recommendations for a holiday, one person had left a 1 star review and after reading it, the person had got mugged in the resort, nowhere near the hotel, and that was why they left a 1 star review for the hotel. People are idiots.
RoisinClare6 wrote: Another example of the man who's picture was used to be shared around to notify he was a paedophile. He tormented by mobs of people and had to be protected by the guards. My mother's friends and a few elderly people I know just share these kind of posts without looking into it, seeing if it is correct information etc they don't think of the ramifications they think they are being helpful, that poor mans life must be in tatters, that's online forever.
AllForIt wrote: » I think the issue is if one puts one business up on social media one can't expect it's going to be all positive. The whole idea of having a Facebook business page is to promote one's business ie advertising. If one feels that the negative feedback is unfair and untrue then it is equally plausible that the positive feedback is also untrue. Advertising on Facebook is a really cheap form of advertising and if one isn't open to criticism then I think they shouldn't run the risk of negative comments at all, in other words, dump your facebook page. Especially if one makes cake and would rather some customers would not eat it.
One eyed Jack wrote: » That wasn't directed at you Murrisk, it was a commentary on the kind of people who spread the stories and incite people to want to join in in destroying someone else's livelihood. The Christian bakers for example who were targeted by a small group looking to raise their own profile, and how that went on social media. I thought their whole "campaign" was incredibly spiteful.
Tigger wrote: » The Christian bakers are homophobes They should just make the ****ing cake and cop on
Grandeeod wrote: » They are entitled to their opinions and shouldn't be rediculed on social media for it. This is the point that you and millions of others don't get and thats because you and millions of others think you can row in behind an issue and shoot your gobs off on social media. Wannabe journo's. Wannabe contributors and wannabe "influencers". All full of **** and opinions, thinking your **** and opinions matter. They don't, because you aren't perfect either.
Tigger wrote: » I think they are entitled to be homophobic but if they don't wanna get hassle they should have made the cake It's a business not at endeavour