nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Get your tits out for the TDs

Donald Trump

That Australian senator lady has been whipping out the baps again. This time while proposing some sort of motion.

So, good citizens of AH, not getting into debate about breastfeeding in public etc.. Feel free to start another thread on that angle.

My question for you is, are there any TDs that you would like to see getting their boobs out? Do we have any that wouldn't turn your stomach? Who would tempt you to switch over from Bangbabes to the late night Oireachtas Report?

I reckon Mick Wallace probably has gotten his moobs out already a few times but you can't count him. I'm only talking about the ladiezzzz.

People can be tough on female politicians. I remember how, for example, Mary Harney or Mary O'Rourke used to get a lot of hassle for their looks. I'd go so far as to say that no matter how much or how little they did for for the country, they always had their knockers*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TDxZrhukjM

As for who has the biggest tits in the Dail....that would probably be the AAA alliance or whatever they are calling themselves.

Something-something-obligatory-pussy-grabbing-reference-something-etc

*pun intended of course

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

mikeybrennan

Your momma

Jim Bob Scratcher

Mary Lou has a daycent pair of baps

[Deleted User]

Useless imo

Dirty Dingus McGee

What an attention seeking idiot.If she wants to feed her child (regardless of how she feeds it) she shouldn't be doing it while she is in the middle of work.

somesoldiers

I have a huge issue with breast feeding in public...the child's head always gets in the way so you can't get a good look at the diddy.

Jim Bob Scratcher

Dirty Dingus McGee wrote: »

What an attention seeking idiot.If she wants to feed her child (regardless of how she feeds it) she shouldn't be doing it while she is in the middle of work.

You're spot on, it just reeks of attention seeking. Poor kid will be mortified in years to come.

J.pilkington

Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: »

Mary Lou has a daycent pair of baps

I think she has 3

Jim Bob Scratcher

J.pilkington wrote: »

I think she has 3

Gerry's head doesn't count.

gramar

Donald Trump wrote: »

That Australian senator lady has been whipping out the baps again. This time while proposing some sort .....

As for who has the biggest tits in the Dail....that would probably be the AAA alliance or whatever they are calling themselves.

*pun intended of course

I don't think that lady in Austrailia was exactly 'whipping out the baps' and as for AAA...they would be very small tits indeed.

Samaris

Really don't care where people feed their babies in public. It's a baby. It doesn't give a flying about social conventions, it wants dinner. Having said that, there were more private places to go, and it seems like a bit of a stunt (unless Australia is more relaxed than most of the rest of the anglophone world regarding breastfeeding).

But stepping back for a moment from the breastfeeding, which seems to be causing the majority of knicker-knotting in the press, why is there a very tiny baby in Parliament? Think of the example the poor mite is being set!

Why won't someone think of the children? :O

Donald Trump

gramar wrote: »

as for AAA...they would be very small tits indeed.

Who has the biggest tits in the Dail?

The AAA. Murphy and Coppinger are a right pair of tits

Donald Trump

J.pilkington wrote: »

I think she has 3

3 pairs? :eek:

myshirt

Donald Trump wrote: »

3 pairs? :eek:

We all know the reason why they call it a waist is because you could've got an extra pair in there.

Mary has seen the gap in the market.

tedpan

Dirty Dingus McGee wrote:

What an attention seeking idiot.If she wants to feed her child (regardless of how she feeds it) she shouldn't be doing it while she is in the middle of work.

How many mistakes were there in that 30 second clip.

I knew Australian's were pretty slow, but the boob out is as you said attention seeking and as for the rest of them, reminds me of the Dail.

How are these people in charge?

andekwarhola

Anybody that objects to women breastfeeding in public needs to grow up. And they're hardly 'whipping them out'.

For all that, doing it as a stunt in your workplace /parliamentary motion is a tiny bit cringeworthy, although I obviously wouldn't be 'offended' by it.

Jim Bob Scratcher

andekwarhola wrote: »

Anybody that objects to women breastfeeding in public needs to grow up. And they're hardly 'whipping them out'.

For all that, doing it as a stunt in your workplace /parliamentary motion is a tiny bit cringeworthy, although I obviously wouldn't be 'offended' by it.

It's the woman in that video who needs to grow up. I have no problem with a woman breastfeeding in public, but I do have a problem with a woman who does it for media attention.

andekwarhola

Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: »

It's the woman in that video who needs to grow up. I have no problem with a woman breastfeeding in public, but I do have a problem with a woman who does it for media attention.

So we essentially said the same thing?

Jim Bob Scratcher

andekwarhola wrote: »

So we essentially said the same thing?

RobbingBandit

We could call it Saill De Mairt where all the wimmins have to wear beadd around their necks for showing their booobies.

andekwarhola

Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: »

I was going to say something sarcastic but I'm laughing now as that's one of my favourite Simpsons scenes.

Damn you.

Samaris

RobbingBandit wrote: »

We could call it Saill D? M?irt where all the wimmins have to wear beadd around their necks for showing their booobies.

Er, translation please? I'm lost.

LadyMacBeth_

I was expecting to see more boobs on this thread. Disappointment. Ah well, I'll go and have a look at my own then

Ush1

Complete stunt. What's next, changing a sh*tty nappy whilst detailing the budget?

RobbingBandit

Samaris wrote: »

Er, translation please? I'm lost.

Fat Tuesday aka Mardi Gras. stoooped auto correct.

Jim Bob Scratcher

LadyMacBeth_ wrote: »

I was expecting to see more boobs on this thread. Disappointment. Ah well, I'll go and have a look at my own then

If I am ever stuck for a ruler I will look this wan up :pac:

volchitsa

Ush1 wrote: »

Complete stunt. What's next, changing a sh*tty nappy whilst detailing the budget?

It amazes me that people (usually men) constantly make this "attention seeking" claim, when anyone who's ever actually looked after a baby knows they don't eat at regular intervals. If a woman is going to breastfeed her baby apparently she has to remain housebound so as not to attract criticism. Or feed her baby in public toilets.

Meanwhile, those who think a baby should eat in the toilet or that feeding it is equivalent to defecating in public are out in force again. No wonder Ireland has one of the lowest rates in the world for babies being breastfed.

vicwatson

volchitsa wrote: »

It amazes me that people (usually men) constantly make this "attention seeking" claim, when anyone who's ever actually looked after a baby knows they don't eat at regular intervals. If a woman is going to breastfeed her baby apparently she has to remain housebound so as not to attract criticism. Or feed her baby in public toilets.

Meanwhile, those who think a baby should eat in the toilet or that feeding it is equivalent to defecating in public are out in force again. No wonder Ireland has one of the lowest rates in the world for babies being breastfed.

Maybe she couldn't express milk into a bottle I suppose

LeinsterDub

vicwatson wrote: »

Maybe she couldn't express milk into a bottle I suppose

Maybe you could stop being so small minded

volchitsa

vicwatson wrote: »

Maybe she couldn't express milk into a bottle I suppose

Having done it myself, it's fine for outings, but it would be physically impossible to have a big enough stock built up to allow you to go out to work regularly.
Speaking personally, the hours involved in expressing sufficient amounts of milk would make that a non-option.

Also, the baby gets hungrier as it gets older, and the milk production adapts in both quality and quantity. With expressed milk you're using your painstakingly-gathered collection of milk from when the baby was some weeks younger, so not ideal for its current age, and quite likely not entirely satisfying for it.

It's hard to see what the point in breast feeding is, in that case. Just stick a bottle in its mouth, and get criticized for that too, eh? :rolleyes:

Chuchote

Baps, tits, bags, boobies - what are you, five?