Samurai12 wrote: » Are you selling the OP3?
marcbrophy wrote: » lafors wrote: » Is there much difference in the UI of the two? What version is OP3 on now? Looks fairly similar tbh, I decided to set it up new, rather than restore from a backup, so I think there's a different launcer. It seems to be very like the pixel launcher. OP3 is on 4.1.6 I've just been prompted to d/l an update for the 5. It's 4.5.1 a 159mb update. Notes are it's a optimisation update with improvements to the folowing: Camera Bluetooth Stability Network Stability System Stability Compatibility with 3rd party apps Exciting stuff
lafors wrote: » Is there much difference in the UI of the two? What version is OP3 on now?
marcbrophy wrote: » Just got mine from UPS! Damn that's quick Now to get rid of the OnePlus 3
budgemook wrote: » bought it Tuesday night about midnight, still says "Processing"
Full Marx wrote: » Not sure how to check that but I'm on and off it most of the day in work and by six pm it's nearly dead and has let me down a few times on the commute home when listening to podcasts
jacksie66 wrote: » It's a spam bot. Posting the same thing in multiple threads..
Joebrosan wrote: » spam .
corwill wrote: » @Basil3/pandabat: it's more a comment on my own expectations than the SoC, really. I thought we'd see Snap. 625-like numbers, but I suppose the 625 doesn't have to drive QHD screens and a gpu to match.
corwill wrote: » Haha, I picked that up completely wrong! Bit disappointing, really, was expecting the 835 to be a big improvement over the 820, battery wise, in all respects, given the manufacturing process.
pandabat wrote: » Not exactly; they said that their experiences with S835s and standby/talk-time was similar across the board and therefore most likely not down to OnePlus but something chipset specific. I believe that they also saw this with Kirin 960 which is closely related to S835 in terms of cores
corwill wrote: » What I found interesting in that review is they said other Snap835 devices did better on standby and talk time. Hopefully that means there's a bit more optimisation left in the 5's battery, with updates.
pandabat wrote: » Well ... according to GSMArena.com's review, battery longevity from usage is better than OP3T but stand-by and talk-time are worse so your experience will depend on how you use the phone e.g. if you're doing a lot of web-browsing then you'll get a lot further with the OP5 than the OP3/OP3T
wotzgoingon wrote: » This is so true. I think it is bragging rights more than anything. It will make damn all difference to daily use.
Tyson Fury wrote: » Well the battery in the 5 is smaller so you won't see any benefit in an upgrade.
deadanonymau5 wrote: » What screen on time are you getting from your OP3?
Full Marx wrote: » Bit more expensive than I had hoped. If the battery lasts considerably longer than on one plus three I will get it, otherwise I'll give it a miss