Jesus Wept wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjGcgdaIIKY Pillow fighting power.
normanoffside wrote: » [ . Mathematically it should be about 1/4...
RoboKlopp wrote: » Mauro Ranallo ex WWE is one of the commentators for the fight.
Mellor wrote: » I'm curious as to how you worked that out, mathematically
normanoffside wrote: » Because he stops him 4 times out of 5. Odds are skewed because of all the money going on McGregor which offer great value..
TheQuietBeatle wrote: » He's pretty overrated in my opinion.If Mayweather destroys McGregor, this could actually be really bad for UFC's brand. Your best fighter who is 28 can't last a few seconds with boxer who is much older and coming out of retirement (albeit a great). Wonder if long term UFC will regret the big pay day for the damage it may do to the image of their fighters.
HONKEY TONK wrote: » Conor will be knocked out in the first round
walshb wrote: » Have you read the script?
snowflaker wrote: » I won't watch it. Its bs. Might as well have Sylvester Stallone fight Jackie Chan
Littlehorny wrote: » True observation! The nearest thing i can think of is the start of Rocky 3 when Rocky fights Thunder Lips (Hulk Hogan)
HONKEY TONK wrote: » It would be scripted if he didn't.
walshb wrote: » Kind of my point... The event has two scenarios.. A complete mismatch beat down due to both men not being in agreement to stage the way the fight goes Or a stage managed event that follows a flow, like WEE..both parties playing their part. Either scenario is a con when you look at it...
walshb wrote: » I will watch the event. It is not a pro boxing contest. Nor is it a sporting contest. Anyone thinking it is is deluded.
mdwexford wrote: » Only an imbecile thinks it isn't.
walshb wrote: » Speak for yourself!
mdwexford wrote: » But you are wrong. It is clearly a sporting contest. Just like if Real Madrid play your local soccer team down the road, or if I give Roger Federer a game of tennis.
Jesus Wept wrote: » Roger is getting on in years. I'd put you at 5/1
froog wrote: » It's entertainment and it's going to be a lot of fun. Some people should lighten up about this.
Mellor wrote: » Sorry you've lost me there. On what basis is it not boxing? Or sport? I agree it's a complete mismatch. But that's not really relevant to either the above. It'll under the rules of boxing, with no unusual modifications (that I'm aware), both men will be getting paid, etc. It's officially sanction as a professional both. Opinion on ability doesn't come into it, even if the opinion is correct. Ditto for sport. It maybe not be a sporting (adj) contest, that doesn't mean it's not sport (noun). Obviously, if the fight ends up being a work it's neither. But there's no way to say at the minute that it will be a work, bad I don't think that's what you were saying.