denis b wrote: » Spot on Gary. 18 weeks P&D with a buffer week for the hols in early July. If i don't need the buffer week then I will just repeat a week of the programme very early on. Will be looking to stick to the plan very closely.
Murph_D wrote: » Well the obvious answer is that your targets are soft, although granted, as we all know by now, it's sometimes dangerous to extrapolate upwards off shorter times. Still though, if I recall correctly your recent 10k time would suggest something closer to 70-72 mins for F Duffy and maybe 1:36-1:37 or better for Half, no? Those times would then of course have you looking at a 3:30 marathon at least. Maybe a tad aggressive to scale up like that but my thinking has always been, if you've raced the times, you've earned the right to train at the appropriate paces for the longer events, and if you do that, you more often than not will come close to the goal. Especially a strong runner like yourself with plenty of gumption and resolve.
Kennyg71 wrote: » Have to agree with D, I think your 10 mile will be closer to 72 than 75 and HM target of 1.35/6or so is achievable off a good Marathon block, and all that going well sub 3.30 for DCM. Just bought P&D Advanced Marathoning, plenty of decent sessions and a good few LR and MLR with MP miles which should give a good feel for pace. Plenty more reading to do though. Best luck with the plan.
hot buttered scones wrote: » Sounds like a plan. The only thing I'd be wary of is the scheduling. On the P+D 18 week plan the 2 races you've specified coincide with MP long runs, so I'd make sure to get those sessions done at some other stage if you plan on racing the races. As for the holidays - do you plan on running at all when your away? The first 2 weeks of the plan only have 4 days running, which might suit when your away. A buffer week might be better used around the half marathon to allow for a mini taper and recovery. As for a target for DCM - 3:3x sounds about right. If you do the Frank Duffy in 1:15 and have a bit left to give afterwards then 3:3x is well within your reach. I think you can take what the calculators give you and add on 3 or 4 minutes at least for Dublin given the nature of the course and also to allow some time for running long (i.e 26.4 miles).What do think of the revised plan posted above M? I found this site a great help with pacing last year:http://mymarathonpace.com/ You'll end up paying something like €7 for the fully functional spreadsheet and pace bands, but you can download the demo version and it will give you some idea of a pacing strategy to use over the drags and pulls of DCM.
hot buttered scones wrote: » I was just messing around with some spreadsheets there and came up with this:P+D 55 The first tab is the plan from the book. The 2nd is the plan with a buffer week from the 10 miler. I've moved all the runs form the week of the half to the week before and changed a few bits the week of the half. The week after the half has an 8k-15k race scheduled so I got rid if that and just added in a MLR to make up the mileage - it might be to heavy a week after the half though. What do you think?Thanks for that M. That is a great help. I am going to take your advice and put the buffer week to better use for the HM and have made the post HM race week alterations as well.
Kennyg71 wrote: » I'd be in the racing the races and adjust the Schudle, there are 4 MP sessions and along with 10 mile race and HM, not to sure you need two many more MP sessions. From limited amount I've read the thought is that stimulus from Racing is worth more than any training stimulus,I have gotten all greedy and managed to get all the MP sessions and races in . Let's see what happens but I am prepared to adjust things to ensure that I get the pb's in. after FD you'll have a good idea how quickly you recover prior to HM, you could always make the call nearer the time depending on how the training is going and how body is holding up.100% agree G. Will be playing things by ear but much easier to do so with a definite plan worked out in advance. I have messed up with lack of planning before and this time there will be a lot less room for mistakes. Paying a lot of attention to pacing and scheduling this time.Thanks for taking the time to input here.
Murph_D wrote: » Agreed. It's up to you but no reason not to race FD and HM, with a little switching around. Wouldnt worry too much about the detail this early - just start the plan with the idea that you'll be racing those weeks and adjust as you get there (generally the race replaces LR, and you back off the session and/or MLR during race week). Personally I rarely did the back to back race/LR that the plan suggests for weeks -6, -4 and -2 anyway. Maybe that was my downfall!Well D, you have the experience of giving it a damn good go. The LR and MP runs are enough on their own :eek:, but I was caught between two stools with the 2 races. Will race them now and the buffer week will certainly help. No doubt, that the HM race will be particularly trying with the other demands but will see how the body copes and put in a decent effort at the very least. As you say...... At this stage of your marathon career, the benefit of the interim racing outweighs the cost to the plan's integrity, I would think.
OOnegative wrote: » Best of luck with the plan D, Dublin the goal?
Annie get your Run wrote: » That hike sounds lovely and bittersweet no doubt, fair play for taking the plunge when the opportunity arose.
Singer wrote: » Congrats on starting the journey to DCM! Your running still produces some good food for thought for you. How did you find running alongside the runway and back into Ballymun? I've never gone out that way, always assumed the cars would be annoying.
Neady83 wrote: » Very jealous of your hiking and Via Ferrata exploits Denis .... not so jealous of your snake encounters :O
ThebitterLemon wrote: » If a scary snake encounter involving Tang a while back Nice going Denis TbL