nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

David Icke...is he f*cking insane?

jeanjolie

I'm not anti-conspiracy or pro-conspiracy. I accept that although a large number of the theories in the community are out there, a sizeable number have circumstantial evidence to support them.

However, David Icke seems to be in a whole other realm figuratively and literally. Ever since his 'journey' during the early 90s and appearance on the Terry Wogan show, he's become the poster child for the 'Reptilian' theories of the Queen, Royal Family, Blair, Bush etc...

Now no one in their right mind here believes this...but my question is simple; is this all a clever hoax by a man looking to make money and/or perhaps a bit of 'spiritual awakening' (motivated mainly by money) or a guy who genuinely had a mental breakdown?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Will I Am Not

The hypocrisy of your average conspiracy theory subscriber never ceases to give me a laugh.

"Wake up sheeple, stop believing what the mainstream media tells you"
*Goes back to some Facebook page run by... who the f*ck knows? to swallow every theory, no matter how far fetched because hey... it's different to what those stupid sheep believe.

xlogo

timthumbni wrote:

Aye. He's a fecking insane snake oil salesman.... and a very successful one at that... lizardpeople for ****s sake....

Yeah - next he'll be saying that a god had a son and he walked the earth etc etc..

How many copies of the Bible have been sold?

How much is the Catholic church worth?

Has he or any of his followers raped and ruined the lives of innocent children?

Zebra3

Glenster wrote: »

When he says lizards he means Jews.

He's just a secret anti-Semite.

Any proof of this?

Pawwed Rig

I have met otherwise very sane and articulate people who believe in flying unicorns, talking donkeys and people rising from the dead. Lizard people isn't too much further of a stretch.

Biggest lickspittle on boardz

Glenster wrote: »

When he says lizards he means Jews.

He's just a secret anti-Semite.

John Ronson thought this too before he interviewed David Icke.

He came to the conclusion that Icke really did mean that the royal families were genuine lizards. It wasn't some hidden code word for Jews.

I'll say one thing for Icke though, he was spot on about high level international paedophile rings amongst the social elites. And he was trying to expose Jimmy Saville for years.

Still, a broken clock etc....

GerryDerpy

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Recently? Look at the recent tabloid campaign against Corbyn for a start and Murdoch's reacrions when he heard there was going to be a hung parliament. Pretty much every Fox News anti-left (insofar as the US has a political left) broadcast (Hannity, Bill O'Reilly - you gonna tell me they were "fair and balanced"...?). Russian interferance against Clinton (and before that everything agaist Saunders) - going back to Blair getting involved in the Iraq war - and the Rothschilds owning most of the world banks...

... is this all new to you or are you playing dumb?

Hum a lot of unconnected events. So you think the Russians are part of it?

I know some media show bias. Tis a natural outcome when you have people directing a big news company.

So to be clear, this New World Order group put Trump in, but also Obama?

FizzleSticks

This post has been deleted.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

GerryDerpy wrote: »

Hum a lot of unconnected events. So you think the Russians are part of it?

I know some media show bias. Tis a natural outcome when you have people directing a big news company.

So to be clear, this New World Order group put Trump in, but also Obama?

QUestion is, why was there media bias? And in favour of right-wing canditaes every time?

Obama-Trump: this is the point: there's not much of a difference and the idea of choice is fake. Obama was just as much a warmongerer as any other US President. A few mild economic reforms and a late pardon for Chelsea Manning, and that was about the only difference between him and his predecessor. The moment they don't want Trump, they have enouogh rope to hang him with. Blair was supposed to be more moderate, still wound up bombing the Middle East for oil.

If they didn't have control, Saunders and Corbyn would be in power right now. (And, just to be clear, I'm not necessarily saying that this would be a better world!)

GerryDerpy

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

If they didn't have control, Saunders and Corbyn would be in power right now. (And, just to be clear, I'm not necessarily saying that this would be a better world!)

Well, you've just made my next point for me. Maybe there is always the same war mongering right wing policies because given the inputs and context these are the most appropriate policies to implement.

So let's say Corbyn got power. And the UK continued at any wars and/or entered new ones. You say that points to NWO Illuminiti whatever. I say it points to a natural selection of the outcome.

Guy:Incognito

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

I
If they didn't have control, Saunders and Corbyn would be in power right now. (And, just to be clear, I'm not necessarily saying that this would be a better world!)

Or maybe they're just not electable ? Much like Sinn Fein. They have peaks when the rest funk up monumentally but still don't gather enough support to actually getting in despite promising everything with no downside.

Biggest lickspittle on boardz

Pawwed Rig wrote: »

I have met otherwise very sane and articulate people who believe in flying unicorns, talking donkeys and people rising from the dead. Lizard people isn't too much further of a stretch.

I remember reading an interview with an ex-Scientologist recruiter some time ago. One thing that stood out for me is that they find it easier to recruit intelligent, professional, successful career driven people as they tend to think of themselves as too clever to be manipulated.

That really opened my eyes to how intelligence is very much relative. Someone can be a straight A Harvard level genius, and still dumb as a box of rocks in the real world.

Joshua J

Problem -> Reaction -> Solution.

Badly Drunk Boy

I like him. Obviously the reptilian thing is ridiculous but I feel a bit sorry for him. Especially since he was a failed goalkeeper (Coventry and Hereford United). And a snooker commentator.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EodiBQ845_s

myshirt

The truth is out there!

youtube!

He drives a beat up old car and lives in a flat in the Isle of Wight, hardly the trappings of a millionaire. He has been bankrupt also. I am noy saying I believe in his stuff but I think he is genuine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQUrw9t5d-g

Samaris

I've kinda come around to the possibility of global conspiracy to control the political arena - at least in the anglophone world. I'm not 100% convinced, and I'm really not convinced about the Illuminati/Rothschild stuff, but I've seen reasonable evidence that links between UK and US politicians, the ownership boards of certain large internet sites, one or two shadowy billionaires and a couple of top media people should be investigated. It's plain as Wednesday that there's rather a lot of incestuous movement between US and UK campaigns - between Farage slithering over to Trump and Sanders people linking on to the next big hope (Corbyn). That's not illegal afaik (although it seems a tad dubious), but some of the other stuff swirling around it is a bit of a swamp.

Really would prefer not to be thinking about it, because it does sound rather conspiracy theory, but there we go, there seems to be enough smoke there that I'm dubious about it.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy Opening to a rabbit hole!

David Icke is completely crazy though.Quite probably genuine, but off his rocker.

Hank Scorpio

I seen an interesting article the other day that showed a lot of Political leaders of Europe's mainstays have no Children. Coincidental most likely, but a strange one.

Italy, Germany, France,the UK, Scotland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and so on.

Probably totally unrelated to this topic just like the video below

Samaris

Dunno if that's surprising, Hank.

First, need a list of world leaders with and without children vs the general population of childless vs non-childless. Then need to compare a job type that's similar in intensity to being a top politician - maybe high-level CEOs? As an intent focus on career could easily preclude the likelyhood of having time for kids, etc.

Also, we should look for signs of laying eggs! Suspicious nests in the buildings of power. :P

Glenster

Biggest lickspittle on boardz wrote: »

I'll say one thing for Icke though, he was spot on about high level international paedophile rings amongst the social elites. And he was trying to expose Jimmy Saville for years.

Still, a broken clock etc....

absolutely no evidence of high level rings among celebrities.

if you want to pat him on the back because he predicted that of all the celebrities of the last 50 years some have been paedophiles go ahead. but I wouldn't consider it to be particularly prescient.

throw enough sh*t and eventually some of it will stick.

Hank Scorpio

This got quietly brushed under the carpet

Are Am Eye

Samaris wrote: »

Also, we should look for signs of laying eggs! Suspicious nests in the buildings of power. :P

Equally, the career focused Lizard will put off laying eggs instead
being caught up in their job.

Will I Am Not

FizzleSticks wrote: »

Yes, it gives them a sense that they are better than others and more perceptive, but really they're doing exactly what everyone else does. They take in information that matches their world view, uses it to form a sense of identity and to find people they can fit in with. So aren't they also the sheeple, who just so happen to believe there are lizard people and major atrocities never happened.

Exactly. I'd have more respect for them if they were even a tiny bit selective in what they choose to believe.
Chemtrails, fluoride, 9/11, vaccines etc.
You'll find that if they believe one they believe them all.

The ironic thing is that they are the biggest sheep of them all

ceadaoin.

Glenster wrote: »

absolutely no evidence of high level rings among celebrities.

if you want to pat him on the back because he predicted that of all the celebrities of the last 50 years some have been paedophiles go ahead. but I wouldn't consider it to be particularly prescient.

throw enough sh*t and eventually some of it will stick.

That person said "social elites", not celebrities. IMO there is evidence pointing towards organised child abuse rings operating within the government and ruling classes in various countries throughout the world. It's the celebrities who usually get thrown under the bus whilst the politicians etc are protected.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

GerryDerpy wrote: »

Well, you've just made my next point for me. Maybe there is always the same war mongering right wing policies because given the inputs and context these are the most appropriate policies to implement.

So let's say Corbyn got power. And the UK continued at any wars and/or entered new ones. You say that points to NWO Illuminiti whatever. I say it points to a natural selection of the outcome.

Then YOU make MY point for me - if your scenario is correct, then it proves that the prefered situation is one of war for economic pruposes and this is going to be implemented regardless of who gets in.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Or maybe they're just not electable ? Much like Sinn Fein. They have peaks when the rest funk up monumentally but still don't gather enough support to actually getting in despite promising everything with no downside.

He's not unelectable, he's unconservative and inconductive with the prefered viewpoint. But they can't say that so the media just leavs it at "uneelctable".

Can you name any specific policies that he has mentioned that would be deem him in such a way?

begbysback

youtube! wrote: »

He drives a beat up old car and lives in a flat in the Isle of Wight, hardly the trappings of a millionaire. He has been bankrupt also. I am noy saying I believe in his stuff but I think he is genuine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQUrw9t5d-g

Genuinely fcuking nuts

Murrisk

Ulysses Gaze wrote: »

He's insane......like a fox!

He's making a mint with this conspiracy theory stuff.

An article from the Telegraph back in 2011

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8933565/David-Icke-would-you-believe-it.html

I know a guy who went to see him "ironically". Yes, the guy in question is a muppet. Loves kvetching on social media about people being materialistic and having poor taste. Insutling the "masses" type thing. Well, fúck right off, mister, at least we didn't shell out to see David Icke mouth-fart about this and that.

Stonedpilot

People hate him cos he speaks alot of truth. People despise the truth deep down.
Media told us total nonsense on 9/11, 7/7 weapons of mass destruction etc etc.
Flouride in water is terrible for you, the World economy that is the is run by the Rothschilds(worth trillions)who see humanity as nothing more than docile slaves is hard to take.
I doubt anyone on this thread ever read his books just scream reptiles and hes mad. Really immature and petty this.
How come no one ever debates his theories on the World economy which is a complete swindle in the back pocket of the Rothschilds?. Why not?.
Im not his biggest fan but funny people believe the non stop lies from the pathetic mainstream media and condemn anyone who is proven right. Ie his writing decades ago that Saville was a major paedo. He has balls and conviction to keep going in the face of adversity.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Stonedpilot wrote: »

How come no one ever debates his theories on the World economy which is a complete swindle in the back pocket of the Rothschilds?. Why not?.
Im not his biggest fan but funny people believe the non stop lies from the pathetic mainstream media and condemn anyone who is proven right. Ie his writing decades ago that Saville was a major paedo. He has balls and conviction to keep going in the face of adversity.

Because that would involve reading something and doing research. Also.... lizards.

Ulysses Gaze

youtube! wrote: »

He drives a beat up old car and lives in a flat in the Isle of Wight, hardly the trappings of a millionaire. He has been bankrupt also. I am noy saying I believe in his stuff but I think he is genuine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQUrw9t5d-g

His wife divorced him so he may have had to make a significant settlement to her.