Noveight wrote: » Murphy's for me, miles ahead of Guinness imo. Have been meaning to try other less popular stouts.
Chancer3001 wrote: » I know a fella working in the brewery. He says the mix has changed for the cheaper in the last decade. And to make up for this they set the taps to a colder temperature. So cold that's it's almost flavourlrss and it's the consistency you're enjoying more than the taste. Only way you get good pints now is with temperature control set by the man behind the bar , and short run from keg to tap. You're only likely to find this in out of the way bars where the quality control team would never check. Which is why Guinness often tastes way better in old man pubs or small country pubs
RayM wrote: » The only (alcoholic) drink I'd ever have in a pub is Guinness (or occasionally Murphy's, depending on where I am), but I don't drink it often enough to be able to tell the difference between a good pint and a poor one. I'd prefer if it wasn't served chilled though - I don't like any cold drinks.
whoopsadoodles wrote: » Well that's interesting because I know someone who works for diageo and according to him, Guinness look after all of their own pints and taps. Also according to him, the difference then in pints between pubs is 1. The pourer and 2. The detergent with which the glasses are washed. I'm not saying he's right and your lad is wrong btw, just that it's interesting to have two different opinions from staff. There are still a fair few decent spots to get a pint in Dublin. Anywhere that you'd call a bar rather than a pub though, I wouldn't even bother trying.
CeilingFly wrote: » I'd disagree - what has changed is the temperature it is served at. The more chilled, the less taste. Pint bottles at about 12 degrees will give you a real taste of Guinness and other stouts / dark beers.
demanufactured wrote: » Much better stouts out there. Murphys is much better than Guinness. Oharas stout is the nicest I've tasted
Paddy The Pirate wrote: » Well, Tis time to report back. Even if tastes shÃite, bad Guinness still makes one intoxicated, very much so.
suicide_circus wrote: » I drink a cheeky little triple hopped IPA called Tosser's Burden. You probably haven't heard if it.
arayess wrote: never got the love for guinness
Galwayguy35 wrote: » I remember the oul fellas used to drink the pint bottles of Guinness. Although even even up to 30 years ago in the small villages there wasn't much of a choice, it was usually 3 taps with Guinness, Smithwicks or Harp.If I order a pint I always taste it before paying the barman, was given a pint of Heineken once that was the colour of an orange skin and handed it straight back to him. You're paying for a product, it's up to the person selling it to ensure it's good quality especially if it's E5 or more a pint.
Yourself isit wrote: » That stuff is good. Can't find it anywhere. Normal Guinness is the blandest of blandest tastes.
Patww79 wrote: » Quite a wait for everyone concerned too waiting for it to settle if it's stout before tasting and paying. I'm sure it's popular in a busy pub.
Senna wrote: » Guinness used to clean the lines every week, they cut that back to every month now. They obviously know that once a month isn't enough and if the bar staff aren't cleaning the lines the other 3 weeks of the month, the beer will be terrible. As for the bottles of stout, the old lads in the bar would always ask to see the bottle before opening it, if it was in date, it would be "too new" and they'd ask if there was any "past their date", out of date by a month or two was always preferred.
jh79 wrote: » Pure theater not necessary at all.
iLikeWaffles wrote: » What are you talking about its completely necessary. Unless of course you like a pint to contain less than a pint and taste like crap. Ever try carry a full to the brim pint of water through a busy crowd. That centimetre serves many purposes!