Francie Barrett wrote: » Not remotely horse racing at all, but anyone following the British election? I think Labour are toast. I had a small bet on Betfair that Labour would win only 100-149 seats at 18's, with a saver on 150-199 at 2.46 to cover my stake. I just cannot see them getting over 200 seats and think there is a greater than 6% chance that they are under 150.
Francie Barrett wrote: Not remotely horse racing at all, but anyone following the British election? I think Labour are toast. I had a small bet on Betfair that Labour would win only 100-149 seats at 18's, with a saver on 150-199 at 2.46 to cover my stake. I just cannot see them getting over 200 seats and think there is a greater than 6% chance that they are under 150.
krustydoyle wrote: » Exit polls are predicting 266 seats for Labour
Copper_pipe wrote: » Vyprvpn
BumperD wrote: » Not sure what price McElroy was but his demeanor at he US open for the last hour or so suggests he has already jacked it in.
NaiveMelodies wrote: » Often ignore Denis Hogan runners but Kalann ran to a mark of 92 this time last year and runs off 57 tomorrow evening in a weak looking race. Top three in the market ran against eachother LTO so if the form of that race is wrong the 25s about Kalann could look very big. Cheekpieces reapplied also.. can't ignore him.
NaiveMelodies wrote: » Despite finishing 10th, the run was a big step up on previous form. Extra distance will suit tomorrow and I'm ignoring my hesitance to back Hogan runners once again. 16s looks too big. Lots of these ran last week and I've no doubt with a change of, eh, tactics.. he would have beaten them.
NaiveMelodies wrote: » Tis a live one, best price 13-2 now, big lunchtime gamble. Could have got 20s this morning though
akelly02 wrote: » whats the horse?
naughto wrote: » Is it worth it now with the price gone?
BumperD wrote: » I see Rostropovich running tomorrow, I remember balldoyle having the exact same named horse before nearly 20 yrs ago. They are hardly running out of names