hu!me wrote: » Isn't a quick visual citizenship check the same as producing your boarding card and drivers licence... you know this is the current set up at passport control.
Avada wrote: » Ah yes, the "ah, you've a big Irish head on ya" check
TheChizler wrote: » Surely there could be a quick visual "citizenship check" and you get diverted to the passport check if needed?
hu!me wrote: » Passport checks are not optional for non EU passengers arriving on CTA flights.
JCX BXC wrote: » You sure about that?
11.—(1) Every person (other than a person under the age of 16 years) landing in the State shall be in possession of a valid passport or other equivalent document, issued by or on behalf of an authority recognised by the Government, which establishes his or her identity and nationality to the satisfaction of an immigration officer. (2) Every person landing in or embarking from the State shall furnish to an immigration officer such information in such manner as the immigration officer may reasonably require for the purposes of the performance of his or her functions. (3) A person who contravenes this section shall be guilty of an offence. (4) This section does not apply to any person (other than a non-national) coming from or embarking for a place in the State, Great Britain or Northern Ireland.
Avada wrote: » This is going round in circles. The immigration hall has limited capacity and a limited number of booths. You physically cannot fit the amount of passengers that land at peak time through that amount of booths
This is going round in circles. The immigration hall has limited capacity and a limited number of booths. You physically cannot fit the amount of passengers that land at peak time through that amount of booths
trellheim wrote: » Untrue; there is no requirement to provide a passport for a CTA flight. If there was, we'd need passports for the Belfast train or the Aircoach. .
Negative_G wrote: » Well then that begs the question as to what the staff are actually doing if not performing what I suspect is their primary duty? If that is correct then it seems the Immigration staff are pointing the finger at the DAA, and the DAA are burying their heads in the sand. Outstanding.
Avada wrote: » The Veteran has already pointed out that there are more staff than booths most of the time (further back in the thread). Staffing shortages were a problem, they aren't anymore.
Afaik, its an EU agreement that all passports are scanned and checked against the Interpol database. Not optional.
plodder wrote: » Just to clarify. Are you saying the automatic scanning booths are to be done away with? Personally, if I were being affected by this, I would contact my local TDs.
Negative_G wrote: » If the shifts need to be adjusted to provide more personnel at busier times then it should be a simple solution to do that. Get people into the booths and then deploy them elsewhere when the demand lessens. Surely there are other tasks and responsibilities for them other than scanning passports?
The Veteran wrote: » Where did anyone say that anyone refused to work any shift pattern. The shift pattern is public knowledge ... 06:00 to 18:00 (2 Units) 14:00 to 02:00 18:00 to 06:00 That means there are two Units in duty in the nightly "rush hour". Some officers work the Lufthansa and other 'odd' flights into Pier 3. There is one and a half if not almost two full Units in the main area for the rush. No breaks are allowed after 22:30 approx. Last night there were more (a good few more) on duty than desks available. Yesterday the Mail on Sunday had a story (repeated in dublin Live today) about a row over maintenance contracts closing the automatic Gates. Where did that tripe come from? The pilot is over; Gates are closed and due to be removed. As I said before ... ask the right questions in the right official channels. Ask the Department for the contact email address of the airport immigration guys.
eeguy wrote: » Because busy times may only be an hour in the morning and an hour in the evening. They can't bring in 6 people to work a 2 hour split shift.
plodder wrote: » Just to clarify. Are you saying the automatic scanning booths are to be done away with?
The Veteran wrote: » Yesterday the Mail on Sunday had a story (repeated in dublin Live today) about a row over maintenance contracts closing the automatic Gates. Where did that tripe come from? The pilot is over; Gates are closed and due to be removed.
As I said before ... ask the right questions in the right official channels. Ask the Department for the contact email address of the airport immigration guys.
Fred Swanson wrote: » This post has been deleted.
Negative_G wrote: » There's the first problem. And probably the root cause of it all, along with incompetent management by the DAA. This notion that you can't expect people to work certain shifts to ensure that there is an appropriate amount of staff present to process large number of passengers is laughabe. The same people would probably want to be heavily compensated if their tea room was moved down hall. As I said already, the whole thing stinks of "union rules, bud". The finger pointing that has gone on already is testament to that. "Not my problem, ask the DAA".
Avada wrote: » Yes(sort of), its paid for.https://www.dublinairport.com/at-the-airport/travel-services/platinum-services?gclid=CjwKEAjwja_JBRD8idHpxaz0t3wSJAB4rXW5_luj7pUkt72HmI8YFefgtl76PWOppPY2BdAlHCD2JxoCg3_w_wcB
Fred Swanson wrote: » Do VIPs and other minor celebrities have their own private passport control?
Fred Swanson wrote: » I can see someone going to challenge it in court, when the wrong person gets delayed.