ohnonotgmail wrote: » i wonder how they are managing that when i havent carried my passport through the airport in nearly a year.
The immigration official said the operation of the system was being monitored in the run-up to Christmas to ensure a balance was struck between maximising the volume of checks and ensuring there was no negative impact on passengers arriving here over the holiday period.
Driving licence or other such CTA approved ID?
geo wrote: » if you mean a passport card, thats scanned too.
Fred Swanson wrote: » I don't know what purpose scanning Irish passports serves. All they can be doing is checking against a list of reported stolen documents. As for checking with Interpol, I don't buy that at all for one second.
Avada wrote: » @quitecranky I'm not going to quote your post, mainly because it is impossible to read.
Fred Swanson wrote: » So what happens if their computers go down and there are several flights to be cleared? Is everyone detained until the issue is fixed?
Avada wrote: » . And no, staff are not intentionally going slowly. Believe me, they want rid of you as quick as possible. Queues lead to aggressive passengers and make staffs life difficult. The chips are scanned on every passport, depending on the passport this can take up to 20 seconds. They're not contractors, their civil servants.
Fred Swanson wrote: » This post has been deleted.
Fred Swanson wrote: » Do VIPs and other minor celebrities have their own private passport control?
Fred Swanson wrote: » I can see someone going to challenge it in court, when the wrong person gets delayed.
Avada wrote: » Yes(sort of), its paid for.https://www.dublinairport.com/at-the-airport/travel-services/platinum-services?gclid=CjwKEAjwja_JBRD8idHpxaz0t3wSJAB4rXW5_luj7pUkt72HmI8YFefgtl76PWOppPY2BdAlHCD2JxoCg3_w_wcB
Negative_G wrote: » There's the first problem. And probably the root cause of it all, along with incompetent management by the DAA. This notion that you can't expect people to work certain shifts to ensure that there is an appropriate amount of staff present to process large number of passengers is laughabe. The same people would probably want to be heavily compensated if their tea room was moved down hall. As I said already, the whole thing stinks of "union rules, bud". The finger pointing that has gone on already is testament to that. "Not my problem, ask the DAA".
The Veteran wrote: » Yesterday the Mail on Sunday had a story (repeated in dublin Live today) about a row over maintenance contracts closing the automatic Gates. Where did that tripe come from? The pilot is over; Gates are closed and due to be removed.
As I said before ... ask the right questions in the right official channels. Ask the Department for the contact email address of the airport immigration guys.
plodder wrote: » Just to clarify. Are you saying the automatic scanning booths are to be done away with?
The Veteran wrote: » Where did anyone say that anyone refused to work any shift pattern. The shift pattern is public knowledge ... 06:00 to 18:00 (2 Units) 14:00 to 02:00 18:00 to 06:00 That means there are two Units in duty in the nightly "rush hour". Some officers work the Lufthansa and other 'odd' flights into Pier 3. There is one and a half if not almost two full Units in the main area for the rush. No breaks are allowed after 22:30 approx. Last night there were more (a good few more) on duty than desks available. Yesterday the Mail on Sunday had a story (repeated in dublin Live today) about a row over maintenance contracts closing the automatic Gates. Where did that tripe come from? The pilot is over; Gates are closed and due to be removed. As I said before ... ask the right questions in the right official channels. Ask the Department for the contact email address of the airport immigration guys.
eeguy wrote: » Because busy times may only be an hour in the morning and an hour in the evening. They can't bring in 6 people to work a 2 hour split shift.
Negative_G wrote: » If the shifts need to be adjusted to provide more personnel at busier times then it should be a simple solution to do that. Get people into the booths and then deploy them elsewhere when the demand lessens. Surely there are other tasks and responsibilities for them other than scanning passports?
plodder wrote: » Just to clarify. Are you saying the automatic scanning booths are to be done away with? Personally, if I were being affected by this, I would contact my local TDs.
Afaik, its an EU agreement that all passports are scanned and checked against the Interpol database. Not optional.