Mellor wrote: » You might want to check the date on that article. It's hardly going to list fights that didn't happen. But according to that, only one fight in the 90's broke 1.5m. You claimed that the Joshua Klitschko fight was a fraction of that. I think you should double check that tbh. By all reports Joshua Klitschko cleaned up the PPVs.
EagererBeaver wrote: » People swallow and regurgitate the lines about boxing being dead and MMA being the "fastest growing sport in the world" without any evidence whatsoever.
Mellor wrote: » While that's completely true. MMA hasn't been the fasest growing in years if it every was. But at the same time, comparing the biggest PPV of the year in each is hardly indicative of the general state of either sport.
raze_them_all_ wrote: » I invented a new sport today. It has 3 new players already a player increase of 300%. Fastest growing sport in the world
Mellor wrote: » Your sport will be toppled tomorrow when I round up 4 lads and show them the new sport I invented
evil_seed wrote: » If boxing is dying how come McGregor wants a boxing match?
CatFromHue wrote: » I really do struggle at how if this fight goes ahead it'll be the end of boxing. Floyd is not a belt holder, has no mandatories, is retired, will be retired a full 2 years if the fight is made, and is 40 years old!!! I dunno what Oscar is talking about.
CatFromHue wrote: » If they both go ahead in Sept that's still not the end of boxing though. It's not good for business for either fight.
Mellor wrote: » By all reports Joshua Klitschko cleaned up the PPVs.
Jamiekelly wrote: » You're right. My mistake
wonderfullife wrote: » You're not exactly wrong though. Yes the Joshua fight did very well but look at the context:1. Joshua Klitschko did 1.5m buys, impressive, but the PPV was priced at £19.99. Conor Nate 2 did 1.65m buys at $60.00.2. Also worth noting boxings biggest gate this year, Joshua Klitchsko did £8 million with a crowd of 90,000. Conor Eddie did $17.7 million with a crowd of 20,427. That probably speaks more to how big a star Conor is than any comment on the health of both sports - but it's still clear that the biggest MMA fight of 2016 crushed the biggest boxing fight of 2017 (thus far) in financial terms.
EagererBeaver wrote: » It doesn't speak "more" to how big a star McGregor is. It speaks completely to how big a star he is. While I generally agree with your assessment, you're not comparing like with like. One was a fight in prime time in a market, if you combine the UK and Germany of 150 odd million. The other was a fight in prime time, in the US in a market of 300m.
wonderfullife wrote: » Yeah, bigger market for the PPV of course. A fairer comparison would be Canelo-Chavez (same US market) as that's the biggest US boxing fight of 2017 so far. 1. Nate Conor 2 - 1.65m buys, Conor Eddie $17.7m gate 2. Canelo Chavez - 1m buys, $10.6m gate Fairest comparison possible. Same market, same PPV price ($60). Incidentally the other parameters on how you might compare the sports, MMA does seem to come out on top (ratings for tv cards etc) but I don't have any real opinion (or care) which sport is bigger. Conor is just huge. If the fight comes off, I can definitely see them pushing the Floyd-Manny numbers very close. It may well end up being close to a $1 billion fight worldwide.
CatFromHue wrote: » The two of them saying how much money they have and how they both run the game isn't going to be very entertaining if you ask me
xtal191 wrote: » http://www.boxingscene.com/wba-turns-back-on-floyd-mayweather-vs-conor-mcgregor-fight--116947
Jamiekelly wrote: » Conor calling him a Malteser with eyeballs was gold though.
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Will it be on BT sports here I wonder or Will we be charged PPV? MayPaq only fight I can think of that was PPV at 5am in the morning here?