cml387 wrote: » Is your ego cashing cheques your body can't cash, by any chance?
SpitItOut wrote: » Moraliser. The best you can do is say the things you're expected to say. As usual, I can predict every word out of your mouth. You wouldn't understand the relationship me and my dad have. I'll call him out on bull****. I'm not just going to let him win because he's old. Yes, many would let him win - but would they're thoughts actually be influenced by what he said? At least he knows where he stands with me. You can come by to moralise, or you can put your ego aside & admit that you've learned something from me. After all, it's all anonymous here.
SpitItOut wrote: » Moraliser! The best you can do is say the things you're expected to say. As usual, I can predict every word out of your mouth...
SpitItOut wrote: » Everyone has respect for their elders by default. It doesn't take courage to submit.
SpitItOut wrote: » He looked at me as if he didn't know what I meant, and said "what?" I felt like saying "I know you know what appeasement means!" Perhaps he just wasn't expecting me to say that at that moment, but he certainly acted like he didn't get the point I made.
dub_skav wrote: » I can imagine the father's parallel plea to the sister: "I don't want that kind of stuff happening in future - look you know your brother is a blowhard and always needs to be right, it's really not a big deal now is it?"
anna080 wrote: » I have no idea what this thread is about
SpitItOut wrote: » ..........but your place in the hierarchy is low..............
SpitItOut wrote: » Moraliser! The best you can do is say the things you're expected to say. As usual, I can predict every word out of your mouth. Everyone has respect for their elders by default. It doesn't t take courage to submit. That sort of attitude played a part in why the priests abused so many children. And you wouldn't understand the relationship me and my dad have. I'll call him out on bull****. I'm not just going to let him win because he's old. Yes, many would let him win - but would they're thoughts actually be influenced by what he said? At least he knows where he stands with me. Now you can come by to moralise & enjoy the likes your post will get, or you can put your ego aside & admit that you've learned something from me. After all, it's all anonymous here.
MayoAreMagic wrote: » You seem to think that labelling someone a moraliser gives you license to forgo morals yourself... How exactly? As for predicting what i am going to say, well that would be more believable if you actually did it before the fact.. But it may come as a surprise that you are in fact the most predictable poster on the thread. Also what do you think you have taught me?
Estrellita wrote: » Well, I read the whole post (it's a sh.itty boring thursday), and the crux of it is that the teenage OP and his sister were squabbling over fcuk knows what. Dad hates this s.hite and sorted of sided with his daughter, probably because she squawks louder than the OP if she feels wronged. So OP used the word 'appease' and thinks his dad acted like he didn't understand the word. OP also feels he has out smarted his father, I think. I apologize if my interpretation was worse than trying to get through the original post. I thought I could slim down the story a bit, but fcuk me... It's like listening to my teenagers fighting. You just mentally leave the room.
jimgoose wrote: » I get the impression that neither you nor your sister are the sharpest tools in the shed, and rather prone to being a proper pain in the hole. My educated and experienced guess here would be that your father just wants the two of ye to shut up, and isn't particularly interested in whether you're right or not.
SpitItOut wrote: » We're actually not teenagers. We're in out 20s and we never got along.
buckwheat wrote: » Christ you're a boring c**t aren't you
SpitItOut wrote: » He only found out about it because she told him. During our brief argument, I ended up having the last word, so she had to take her frustration with someone.
SpitItOut wrote: » You weren't meant to take it literally! I mean I know the things your kind say. I'd probably end up saying the exact same type of stuff if I were to try take you off. And yet u act as if I haven't heard it before by saying something a "life lesson"! So what is it you think u've taught me?
Poppy Shrilling Birch wrote: » What was the fight about?
SpitItOut wrote: » something very trivial. And to be honest, I didn't even realise it was a fight. What happened was, the milk was on the table as she and mom were having tea. It was about to go sour. I realised she'd forget to put it back (as she always does), so I went to take it. I took the cork off to sniff it as I was putting it in the fridge. She the stopped me saying "you've a thing about the milk" and "we're using that for the tea" even though they no longer needed it. I said "u've a thing about leaving it out". She then said "we're using that for the tea now, come on" even though they no longer needed it. She thought I'd have to put it back, but instead I got a jug and put some milk in the jug instead. She didn't see that one coming!