osarusan wrote: » I wonder do people who think "you can tell a lot about somebody from the.......they wear" spend a lot of time choosing clothes or jewellery to project an image that many others never interpret at all.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » There's no straight man who would give a sh*t what either of the above models are wearing ffs
Estrellita wrote: » I think it would be fair to say that other men may have different tastes than you though. Also, it might very well be a deal-breaker for other men if said women were rotten with ash-tray mouths or were less than hygienic for example. The topic of smoking came up between myself and my OH recently enough, we are both non-smokers. I put it to him that within a short period of time after speaking to him first if I'd discovered he was a smoker I'd have been turned right off him. I fancy the a.rse off the man, he's an amazing person - but I don't think I would have kissed him. I think I'd have made my excuses and left, it's just not for me at all. He has agreed he feels the same way, it would have been very disappointing for either of us. Perhaps Dr Crayfish you'd see past the first shag or two with your models but if there's something going on you don't like surely it would grate on you enough to eventually say 'fcuk that.. I'm off.'
Candie wrote: » A lot of that just drifts past me. I only notice the things I like myself, like a nice watch or belt or something. If someone has dreadlocks and crocs and wears hippy trail clothes (for example), in that case I think it's fair to say they're making a statement of identity with their outfits.
Widdershins wrote: » Unless they just like their dreads, crocs or hippy clothes and don't spend very much time wondering how others will interpret them. Admittedly I know a couple of people who have an obsession with the idea of being ''unique'', would get snotty if one of us happened to have a similar item of clothing, and seem to care very much whether people are getting their message of uniqueness, but not the majority of my friends who dress alternatively. Frankly we all look kind of alike in a way.
Candie wrote: » No way would I kiss a smoker. I don't think smokers realise how it smells or tastes to non-smokers, because of course smoking affects your senses of smell and taste.
Candie wrote: » Most of us wear a uniform of sorts: goths all dress alike, bikers can be spotted by their clothes when they're nowhere near a bike, business people wear the suit uniform, hippies wear their own uniform. Most of us are neither special nor unique, no matter how we like to think that to be the case.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » Is it weird that I love the smell of booze on a woman's breath?
Widdershins wrote: » I smoke and my fingers are perfectly normal, as is the rest of me, probably because I don't smoke eighty woodbines a day, or in an enclosed space, and I'm a clean person, but a yellowed, growly old smoker would be off putting to me, too. People who don't just not smoke themselves but behave like smokers are something that crawled out of the sulphurous pits of hell. Very extreme judgement is off putting. They usually see no irony about it because they don't count their own vices as bad habits. I'm not keen on stretched ears, board shorts, caps on backwards,skinny jean, converse type shoes, lots of piercings on men (I have a few and I think they suit some women). Not trivial but I couldn't go out with a racist or someone with offensive attitudes to people with disabilities.
Johngoose wrote: » Would you go out with somebody with a disability?
Parchment wrote: » I dont hate people who do it or anything. It just really creeps me out - like that its kind of an indicator of what type of person they are. Like a really anal/uptight person.
Widdershins wrote: » Not really, I was just thinking I don't mind either that or cigarette smoke *now and then* on someone's breath. I mean if you were out together. Not all the time. Ack.
neonsofa wrote: » I had an ex who I fancied the absolute pants off. Still do but alas it was npt meant to be. Anyway he was a smoker and I never minded one bit. I would kiss him non stop and never had an issue even though I'm a non smoker. I did want him to stop smoking for his health but that's a different thing like.
bnt wrote: » Smoking isn't a "shallow" thing for me, it's a huge dealbreaker. Not just for what it is, but for what it tells you about the person. I don't get, at all, how some people can think it's normal or OK to inhale carcinogenic smoke in to your lungs. The level of denial of reality that requires is not something I want to have to deal with. A shallow thing for me is anything that says "high maintenance". Eyebrows that have been tweezed until they no longer look human, fake eyelashes, obvious heavy makeup, hair that looks like it belongs to someone else, and so on. Don't get me started on "duckface" ...
leggo wrote: » If they have kids (tried it a couple times, not for me) From a big family (breeds attention seekers used to fighting for attention within the family) Youngest child (not a 100% deal breaker but I'd watch for telltale signs of being spoiled etc) Thick Dub accent Thick bogger accent (basically I want thin accents) Txtspk Only watches reality TV Talks through movies Loves their glass of wine constantly Loosely-tied shoelaces (they're just going to fall)
kittensmittens wrote: » Not picky, eh?
leggo wrote: » I think every man who ever lived would agree with everything I said there...
Johngoose wrote: Would you go out with somebody with a disability?
Ficheall wrote: » I think you're wrong.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bb1b435feca4d036f6db42bb67252c40.svg)
