Cracker86 wrote: » Hi Has anyone had any issues with the grant because the developer was in NAMA. The developer is listed with the revenue website as approved but the solicitor on their side has advised there maybe an issue as the developer is in NAMA. Just looking for any feedback. Thanks
Blingy wrote: » Should be no problem. Just apply as normal. Nama can't discriminate against people that use the htb scheme
Iris2016 wrote: » Hi just want to ask question re form12 do we have to complete all the 16 pages of it and upload all under my enquiries? TIA need help pls
Aph2016 wrote: » Can someone clear this up for me. Solicitor said we have to pay the full 10% deposit in cash and that the builder will take the HTB off the remaining balance of the house. Surely this can't be correct?
Blingy wrote: » Nope. While idea is that you can use the htb scheme to help pay the full deposit. We paid half he deposit and the htb scheme will make up the difference.
REFLINE1 wrote: » Lots of builders trying to pull this stunt as it helps with their cashflow. i dug in my heels via our solicitor and they relented but i know others who bought at same time had to pay the 10%.
Aph2016 wrote: » Thanks for replying. I guess our Solicitor will have to go back argue the case.
Cracker86 wrote: » Our builder tried to pull this aswell, We advised them through our solicitor that the principal aim of the grant is to aid buyers the deposit as opposed to allowing people to take a smaller mortgage and that the grant is to assist with the buyers cash flow not the builders. Just waiting to hear back now so hopefully we can proceed
Tuhula wrote: » Yep same with us, in the process at the moment. Had to pay the full 10% and uploaded the contracts then last week, got approved this week from Revenue and the 5% should be with the developers in the coming days.
Cracker86 wrote: » Did you challenge the developer on it or was it just as convinent to pay the 10%. I ain't in a position to pay the 10% so really need the delevoper to stop digging their heels.
Tuhula wrote: » We actually didnt challenge as we are putting the 5% from the Revenue towards the funding, so technically funding 15% in cash (our 10% and Revenue 5%) and rest from mortgage...however before we put down the booking deposit we were told we would have to put down the full 10% and claim back the 5% after contracts signed... i believe everyone in the development were told the same thing .. without the 5% from Revenue, we wouldnt have been able to get the house, so to us, it worked out well.
Aph2016 wrote: » Can't believe they are getting away with this.
Tuhula wrote: » It goes against the whole idea of the scheme. Not sure if people challenged it and the developer backed down.
Cracker86 wrote: » We are in the course of challenging it, surely if they don't back down we could report them to revenue who really should remove them from their approved developer list, although I wouldn't hold my breath on that
Jellybaby17 wrote: » We were in the same situation, we tried to fight against it but they wouldn't back down We needed the other 5 % for something else but nearly lost the house so we paid in the end Thankfully our revenue has come through and been paid to the developer so when we draw down our mortgage we will give them the rest we owe them minus the extra 5 % and get it back It is a horrible situation and you are right they should not be allowed get away with it If we couldn't come up with the five percent we would have actually lost the house even though from the start they said they accept help to buy Horrendous
mjp wrote: » Looks like one of first thing Varadkar is planning on doing is getting rid of help to buy scheme. Will be carrying out a review first to see if scheme is having a negative impact on house prices but be pretty certain that that will be the case. Anyone looking to claim should do so in quick time because he doesn't mention that he has any other scheme to directly replace it.