Tyson Fury wrote: » Foxy Knoxy, absolutely Jennifer Pan, no chance.
Atoms for Peace wrote: » Never heard of her before, but who at some point hasn't considered murdering their parents.:rolleyes:
Hercule Poirot wrote: » Honestly, it would depend on who they murdered, why they had done it and how it had affected them - but I wouldn't disregard a potential partner just because they had committed murder.
Phoebas wrote: » :eek:
annascott wrote: » I voted 'no' but there should be an 'it depends on circumstances' option. If someone accidentally killed someone in a car accident and was charged with murder (as has happened before) I would overlook that. But definitely no to anything deliberately premeditated and/or violent.
Winterlong wrote: » She was. And then she wasn't. And then she was again. But now she isn't. Them Italians can't make up their minds.
Cianmcliam wrote: » In fairness they did establish that she was present when the murder took place and was the only person with any motive to perform the cleanup afterwards, plus the fact that her blood was mixed with the victims in several locations outside the locked room. The victim's DNA was present on a knife found in her boyfriend's apartment. We know she was at the very least an accessory to murder. The acquittal was entirely founded on her DNA being absent from the room where the body was found. People have hung on less evidence.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » No straight man would ever get any so.
badabing106 wrote: » Someone renowned like Oscar Pistorius or Amanda Knox?
anna080 wrote: » Amanda Knox isn't a murderer
tomwaterford wrote: » Amanda knox yes Oscars pistorious....no
Hector Bellend wrote: » I'd definitely bang amanda knox
ThinkProgress wrote: » Yeah, she is... Just like OJ, and everyone else who played the system and won!! Actually, I think I would date Foxy Knoxy... could be exciting knowing she had the capability to kill you! lol (like that movie Mr&Mrs Smith) :pac::pac:
anna080 wrote: » Nope. OJ clearly killed Ron and Nicole, the prosecution just botched the case. Rudy Guide killed Meredith Kercher and admitted it. But that was too boring for the British media. No evidence places her in the room.
Cianmcliam wrote: » She placed herself at the crime scene. No evidence, apart from a cigarette butt, places her at her own house so the lack of evidence of her in the room is not surprising. Her boyfriends DNA was found on a ripped off bra clasp in the room where the murder took place. Guede could not have killed her alone and even if he did, he would not have cleaned up the house like Amanda did. Amanda made a big mistake leaving the only lamp in her room inside the locked murder room after she cleaned up, she also told friends details of the murder she could not have known. She is guilty, but her family and supported pulled off a spectacularly successful PR disinformation campaign.
anna080 wrote: » Guede has admitted to killing her alone. Of course he could have done this alone, why do you think he couldn't have? The DNA evidence should have been thrown out as the forensic officers didn't adhere to protocol and clearly their lack of forensic adherence corrupted and compromised the evidence that was there. They didn't change gloves. Raphael touched the handle on Merediths door on the morning of the murder as he tried to get in. The forensic officers, after touching this door, then went on to touch the bra clasp without changing gloves. There is zero evidence which places them in the room at the time of her murder.
Cianmcliam wrote: » Guede never said he did it alone. Two different knives were used from two different directions while Meredith was continuously restrained. He also had no reason at all to stage a burglary or clean up the hallway and bathroom like Amanda did. He also wore shoes while Knox and Sollecito left bare footprints in blood that they tried to wash away. If the nonsense excuse of the 'door handle' DNA were true then Sollecito's DNA would have been found in several places, in fact it was only ever discovered on a cigarrete butt removed weeks earlier and on the bra clasp. DNA does not transfer easily, it has to be gouged out from below the outer layer of skin and it doesn't cover something like a door handle.
anna080 wrote: » DNA does not transfer easily? Where are you getting that from? It transfers incredibly easily and there is a high risk of transfer through latex gloves. The footage of them finding the bra clasp is available to view online- they do not change gloves before picking it up by the clasp itself and examining it. They then drop it back down on the floor- further contaminating it- and start to take photos of it as if this is their first time seeing it. They are meant to change gloves before they touch any piece of evidence. They didn't. Also they found the clasp six weeks after the murder took place. This footage clearly shows their inept collection methodologies. They also walked all over the apartment without ever changing their boots. They are required to be changed constantly. There was absolutely no footprint in that apartment that contained a mix of Amanda's and Meredith's DNA-none. The footprints presented in court were not Amanda's and Raphael's and this was ruled out in court. They were Guede's partial footprints. The other bare footprints were deemed indistinguishable in court. Have you watched the Netflix documentary? It unearths most of the sensationalist crap that your post entails. Guede didn't clean up all of the bathroom, quite the opposite in fact. Are you saying because she was stabbed three times, this means three people were involved? He was more than capable to overpower Meredith. The prosecution was absurd in suggesting it was not possible that this act was carried out by one person. There are a gazillion cases throughout history which prove this statement invalid. It's impossible to have Rudy's DNA ALL OVER the crime scene, and not Amanda's and Raphael's if they were involved- impossible. The minuscule amount of their DNA that was found has been attributed to transfer in the process as the officers were inept. Even the amount of blood found on "the knife" was considerably minute- the same knife that has apparently slashed her throat. This was not a legitimate sample and not a profile. Meredith's wounds attest to the fact that she struggled for her life and fought back- she would not have been able to do this had their been 3 people over powering her and holding her down as the prosecution claimed. He also didn't "stage a burglary". He was burglarising the house and Meredith arrived home and disturbed him. He was a known burglar in the area, and was arrested for one two weeks earlier. A close contact crime such as this nature would have meant the offender would be covered in her blood. A&R were not. She is supposed to have taken part in a sex orgy and very bloody killing where there was evidence of a struggle; and its accepted there was no cleanup yet not one bit of DNA of her was found in the room or on Meredith; yet Guede's was found everywhere. Similarly, there was zero wounds found on A&R consistent with a defense struggle by Meredith. All Meredith's clothes had Guede's DNA on them- not A&R's. What more evidence do you need? It's quite scary actually that someone can be convicted of murder, with zero evidence placing them at the scene and zero forensic evidence of them ever being involved. I don't even remember Guede's trial, do you? And he pleaded guilty! In fact- I think his trial got fast tracked. The fact is, this wasn't enough for the British media- they wanted Amanda. If you watch this Netflix doc you will see the scumbag behaviour from British journalists that I am on about. They didn't even bother to fact check, and their absolute goal was to add a bit of spice to a boring old rape and murder case. And people like you have fallen for their salacious and incredulous headlines. Stop reading nonsence articles on the internet and pay attention to the cold hard facts.
Cianmcliam wrote: » The last sentence is irony personified. This is all PR talking points from the Knox campaign. Have you read any of the actual judgements or court documents? Have I watched the Netflix documentary? Jesus wept.
