Donal55 wrote: » Build a wall. A big one.
tomwaterford wrote: » Can we expect an emergence of super heros and villains here
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » 70 years later and some infrastructure may be showing it's age.
LordSutch wrote: » China Syndrome? Nothing on Sky or BBC News ..... Yet.
Glenster wrote: » Its been on the bbc website for hours.they just dropped some waste, its not going to melt down or anything.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » I can't remember what I did with my jaysus iodine tablets.
biscuithead wrote: » Apparently this site is the most contaminated place in the US and has been leaking since 2011. There is 53 million gallons of deadly radioactive liquid waste held in decrepit, ageing tanks. 53 million gallons is over 100 Olympic swimming pools. :-0
ED E wrote: » Isnt this the definition of "Superfund site". Take 0.001% of the DoD budget and its sorted.
biscuithead wrote: » Apparently this site is the most contaminated place in the US and has been leaking since 2011
From 1944 through the late 1980s, Hanford generated nearly 2 million cubic meters ... of high-level tank waste ... Liquid evaporation, discharge to the ground, chemical treatment, and tank leakage reduced this volume by 90%