slave1 wrote: » My neglected CRV, busy this year selling our two cars while we purchased new (to us) ones but down to the two new ones now so tackled my car over the weekend. Not touched since October but had a good wax so was happy leaving it as is for those last few months...by the time I was finished it was gloomy and not much reflecting about Pro Kleen Foam via Detailers Utd Karcher Lance, grit guard bucket hand wash, rinse, Autoglym detar, Bilt Hammer clay, detail brush wash of all joints, seals etc, foam, grit guard hand wash, rinse, hand dry, triple Auto Finesse glaze by hand, double Collinite 845 wax by hand, haven't done the wheels yet apart from jet wash.
slave1 wrote: » Got around to tackling one of the wheels and the interior yesterday. For the interior it was vac followed by one of those sponge mud thingys ]
Bandito909 wrote: » What's a sponge mud?
slave1 wrote: » Specifically this, no residue, gets everywhere
Bandito909 wrote: » That's the oddest detailing contraption I've seen so far!!
digitaldr wrote: » I have a 2 month Peugeot 3008 (in the background in the first photo) - is it too soon to consider clay in it?
ronnie3585 wrote: » Spent 5 or 6 hours on the car today. Washed, de-tarred, de-ironed (god I hate the smell of Iron-X!), clayed and then I gave it a coat of recently acquired Soft 99 Fusso. It was easy to apply and remove once applied very thinly. It's not massively glossy, but I think it left a very nice finish. Thankfully, no rain in the west today so didn't get to see its famous water action.
vectra wrote: » Didn't you have that done with cquk?
ronnie3585 wrote: » Correct! However, it appears to be degrading badly. The main reason for the full decontamination was to try to clean everything off the coating and see what state it was in. It's pretty poor (i.e. not very hydrophobic) so I sealed it up with Fusso, which I'm very impressed with.
vectra wrote: » Yes, I had the same feeling myself. I am debating what to do this time. CQUK Machine polish after a year Cquk again. Or Proper prep and just use Fusso occasionaly. My only concern id would the CQUK help keep the car cleaner?? Decisions.
ronnie3585 wrote: » I'll give it a couple of weeks before I decide, but I'm inclined to stick with Fusso for the time being. It's not nearly as fussy to apply as CQUK and if I get only half of its advertised 12 months longevity I'll be laughing. I poured a watering can of rainwater over the wing today and the hydrophobicity is amazing, even more impressive than ceramic.
h3000 wrote: » Got the car washed, de-tarred, de-ironed, clayed and after a six month plus wait I broke out the DAS-6 PRO for the very first time (2 year olds and the newborn siblings are very demanding ). Unfortunately the evening dew fell in a put a stop to the polishing but I'm off for the week so hope to finish it off in the morning. Then stick on a layer of Fusso. I will throw up a few pics if it truns out respectable
Curran wrote: » Vectra; I know we've discussed your CQUK experience before, and you found that it got a bit of a boost from the decontamination job you did. Just to let you know, which might be a factor in your choice going forward; there is now Essence+ which is a non abrasive, polish-like in usage, product that contains SiO2 and ceramic coat repair agents, high gloss quartz resins, and hydrophobic nanoparticles! Essentially a repair for the coating to prolong its lifetime.
Curran wrote: » Ronnie; Surprised that you found CQUK to have a dramatic drop off. Im not picking on you, but rather trying to help understand where it might have gone wrong, for yourself, myself and others. How long is it on the car? Would you say that your prep and application to be good (obviously I dont mean IR lamps etc, but didnt get wet early in the curing time, etc)? Would I be right in saying that this isnt the first time youve applied on top of the coating, as you werent a fan of the appearance and you wanted a deeper, warmer glow. What shampoo / cleaners were you using?
h3000 wrote: » It's not perfect and there is still some swirling but for the time constraints and my lack of experience with a DA I'm quite happy how it turned out. The pics are only off my phone so please excuse the quality.
Noccy_Mondy wrote: » Such a nice colour, not very common though!