nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Manchester City vs manchester United Thursday 27th April sky sports 8pm

jayo26

Manchester-_United-vs.-_Manchester-_City.jpg

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Giggsy11

5starpool wrote: »

Off the top of my head no idea, but I remember seeing him get free and easy with his elbows several times earlier in the season (as well as many other seasons).

I'm sure you'll laugh at my lack of detailed research, but I don't care about that.

He might not laugh but I will surely laugh at your misinformed nonsense.

[Deleted User]

fullstop wrote: »

you of all people saying this, you've spent the last 3 pages having a tantrum.

Oh man you come across awful bitter
Consistently

RobertKK

United unbeaten since October,
5 goals in total conceded in the PL in 2017, two of them penalties.

Keep that up and they have a decent chance.

Nalz

Johner wrote: »

Not a great game, United will be happy enough with that point despite needing 3. City for all their possession never really looked like scoring. 0-0 was a fair result.

Thought City just deserved it despite being poor final third.

1-0 would have been the fairest score imo.

Will take the draw though!

[Deleted User]

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Oh man you come across awful bitter

Lemons, Lemons everywhere

Jayop

martyos121 wrote: »

Yeah you basically did though, if someone had a reason to fall like that, of course an injury is implied.

You're so overly-confrontational, settle down man.

So what your saying is for someone to fall like that they'd need to be injured badly. But somehow he was laughing a minute later?

SlickRic

Rossi IRL wrote: »

Both went in with their heads. Shouldnt both have been sent off?

They didn't.

Both walked towards eachother, ending up face to face, but Fellaini was the one who thrust his head in a sort of headbutt motion.

It did zero damage, Aguero completely dived, but Fellaini's was the only motion resembling a headbutt.

deadybai

monkey9 wrote:

Now let us never speak of this tripe again.

Id watch that 10 times over if i never had to watch the first united Vs pool

rob316

dire. contrast to what el classico gave last week it's pathetic from 2 of the supposedly top teams in the league. zero quality

JamboMac

Giggsy11 wrote: »

Ref was amazing for ManCity. How he missed so many obvious fouls and kicking against ManUtd players and didn't hesitate to show Fellaini yellow card is beyond me.

Overall poor game, shame how many times Rashford was kicked to ground and wasn't even given foul.

If you look at it, if we got half the decisions other teams like chelsea and city get we would be comfortably in the top 4, but we don't we seem have to win legitimately in comparison to other clubs.

Liam McPoyle

Aguero clearly drew Fell in but he took the bait.

There was minimal contact and Aguero over reacted but it was a straight red, no doubt.

Players simply cannot move their head towards another, Fells height over Aguero also made it look worse.

Pure stupid by him and we can have no complaints.

Jayop

SlickRic wrote: »

They didn't.

Both walked towards eachother, ending up face to face, but Fellaini was the one who thrust his head in a sort of headbutt motion.

It did zero damage, Aguero completely dived, but Fellaini's was the only motion resembling a headbutt.

Rubbish. Aguero stretched up to him but the wee short arse couldn't get up high enough.

Unearthly

Good result. For once Aguero didn't finish his chances v United

Johner

Nalz wrote: »

Thought City just deserved it despite being poor final third.

1-0 would have been the fairest score imo.

Will take the draw though!

Yeah there probably could have been no arguments if City did nick it but I thought United defended well enough. Bailly was very good.

Jayop

Rod Munch wrote: »

Aguero clearly drew Fell in but he took the bait.

There was minimal contact and Aguero over reacted but it was a straight red, no doubt.

Players simply cannot move their head towards another, Fells height over Aguero also made it look worse.

Pure stupid by him and we can have no complaints.

You can. Should fellaini have dived would Aguero have been off? Would he ****.

SlickRic

Jayop wrote: »

Rubbish. Aguero stretched up to him but the wee short arse couldn't get up high enough.

Cool.

RobertKK

rob316 wrote: »

dire. contrast to what el classico gave last week it's pathetic from 2 of the supposedly top teams in the league. zero quality

El Clasico, they couldn't defend.

GotTheTshirt

JamboMac wrote: »

If you look at it, if we got half the decisions other teams like chelsea and city get we would be comfortably in the top 4, but we don't we seem have to win legitimately in comparison to other clubs.

Haha

Osmosis Jones

It was a headbutt, plain and simple. Don't know how anyone can oppose the decision.

Bridge93

City deserve a draw. Crap in front of goal. United very well organised and looked very comfortable given they'd so little ball

deaddonkey15

It looked to me like Fellaini just lowered his head more than anything rather than thrust it forward at Aguero. Still though, he was an idiot and deserved to go. He is a shockingly limited player and simply not good enough for United. I don't understand why Aguero gets away without at least a booking though. It was blatant simulation - although Atkinson had a habit of missing blatant yellow card offenses committed by City players tonight.

Decent point, but pathetic stuff from United all night.

martyos121

Jayop wrote: »

So what your saying is for someone to fall like that they'd need to be injured badly. But somehow he was laughing a minute later?

You said you wanted to see someone give him a reason to fall to the ground like that. Everyone knows what you meant, you're backtracking now but you'll deny that too of course. As others have said, maybe step away from the computer for a bit, you're getting worked up over nothing.

Korat

Aguero is a nasty piece of work, I don't know how anyone can defend his behaviour.

[Deleted User]

So basically Fellaini isn't too bright. Hardly a revelation. Pure stupidity from him.

niallo27

JamboMac wrote: »

If you look at it, if we got half the decisions other teams like chelsea and city get we would be comfortably in the top 4, but we don't we seem have to win legitimately in comparison to other clubs.

You seem to forget all them offside goals utd got. The reason utd are out of the top 4 is because they are so ****e taking chances not because of any ref.

fullstop

Jayop wrote: »

I'm complaining the one point not having a tantrum then you have people making up **** that your saying.

Cheating won the day anyway. Fellaini banned now for the run in.

You're having a tantrum.

M!Ck^ wrote: »

Oh man you come across awful bitter
Consistently

Aww micko don't be like that

I'm not the one wearing out the swear filter for pages on end.

Oh, and likewise

Sure go and trawl back weeks of posts to drag something up again like you did the other day

Andersonisgod

Well that wasn't great. Credit to Man City, that was their best defensive performance of the season, they were tremendously well-drilled in the transition and dealt immensely well in the 1 vs 1's. The downside is that Toure/Fernandinho axis is so slow and basic on the ball for a midfield duo of a side that want the ball and want to attack. Aguero, again, missed too many chances and that's the difference tonight between 1 point and 3, and too often this season it has been the difference for City.

For Man Utd, they got a point, they'll be happy. They had a chance off a set piece for Herrera and the Fellaini sending off was a welcome for Mourinho to shut up shop completely. I mean this in the least provocative way possible because I would love to know from real Man Utd fans, do you enjoy Mourinho's approach to football and is it what you want at your club? Maybe I'm just a bit naive but, for me, I couldn't ever imagine Barcelona accepting a performance like that once, let alone often. Is your joy of football derived solely from winning games (and it's not as though he's having an incredibly successful season either) or should you take pleasure from seeing your team attack and try to play? I do find it incredible that a club with Man Utd's history of success and attacking football has so willingly accepted Mourinho.

Jayop

martyos121 wrote: »

You said you wanted to see someone give him a reason to fall to the ground like that. Everyone knows what you meant, you're backtracking now but you'll deny that too of course. As others have said, maybe step away from the computer for a bit, you're getting worked up over nothing.

You don't know what I meant at all quite clearly. You can put one on someone without it even being a foul. Maybe you've only just started watching football but going in hard on someone doesn't equal injuring them.

And stick your advice.

[Deleted User]

Osmosis Jones wrote: »

It was a headbutt, plain and simple. Don't know how anyone can oppose the decision.

It wasnt a headbutt, plain and simple. Dont know how anyone could oppose the decision.

Gatling

Rod Munch wrote: »

Aguero clearly drew Fell in but he took the bait.

There was minimal contact and Aguero over reacted but it was a straight red, no doubt.

Players simply cannot move their head towards another, Fells height over Aguero also made it look worse.

Only remember sky showing the Barton sending off against City on the final day yesterday as part montage he touched sergio agueros side and instantly hit the deck in pain ,
Fellani was stupid leaning in id love to see FA slap a simulation charge on him for his part too