Yourself isit wrote: » I think the "Single people are psychological" judgementalism tells us more about you, and to a certain extent Ireland - particularly country Ireland - than single people. Very odd. I'm not single btw, but Ireland is still very Catholic in its relationship status. The assumption here is that there no pool of available dates past 35 could only be true in a society where people couple by that age and don't divorce or seperate. So it's hook up by 35 or be damned to be a singleton.
sassyj wrote: » This is utter bullsh*t. Any meaningful backup to your pronouncement beside anecdotal evidence??? Quite a few over-35 single people on this thread, by your reckoning most of us are mentally damaged in some way. And age wise, how does it work, 34 and single, AOK. 35, ok now you've mentally deficient in some way and are unable to form relationships.
Purple Mountain wrote: » ...as she has not offered any factual basis to this 'fact'. Was there a field study done or some test on 'single' lab rats to prove the correlation between the single 35+ yr old and the liklihood to be physically or psychologically unwell? I missed that one.
Mrs OBumble wrote: » And I absolutely know that some people who screen candidates / volunteers for roles working with vulnerable people regard ones who aren't currently in a relationship as potentially more risky than ones who are.
Mister Vain wrote: » Some people in work think I have a girlfriend because I have photos on facebook with a girl I met on holiday. I neither confirmed nor denied it. No harm in letting them think that I suppose. It might allay their suspicions of me being gay.
Potential-Monke wrote: » Was having a conversation with a mate of mine the other night. I'm 33, 34 in a month, he's just turned 36. He keeps asking (usually during inebriated states) if he'll ever find the one and settle down and have a family. I never want kids, so he's asking the wrong person. He thinks that he is constantly judged for being single, worrying that people think there's something wrong with him, etc, etc. Me, couldn't care less. While i miss the companionship of having a missus, i never want kids so my options are limited, and i'm ok with that. And i usually give no fcuks what people think of me. I know who i am, what i like, etc. I brought up the fact that I have no issue with going to the cinema by myself (Limitless, so i go quite often). He said he could never do it, that people would be staring at him as the single loser at the cinema by themselves. I told him i went to see The Secret Life of Pets by myself, the last day it was in the cinema. I was the only person by myself and there were 5 others families there with their kids. My mate said he'd have to walk out for fear of someone judging him. Made me wonder if people actually do judge singletons. So, AH, do ye judge us lucky folk?
neonsofa wrote: » It's similar to when I mention saving for a house/ my career or something, and (it's generally older women) they say "ah sure a man will come along and provide for you, you needn't worry about that", as if it is a given that I want a person to not only be in a relationship with, but to also provide for me. I sometimes worry that I have become too settled in providing for myself, in that it makes me anxious thinking about sharing finances or buying a home with somebody else and becoming dependent on them in a way, but financial stability from a partner seems to be where the concern comes from when people mention my being single.
IamtheWalrus wrote: » I'm the same. I've provided for myself for so long now (and am good at it) that I almost wonder if I could ever share it all, I'd almost resent the other person for piggy-backing on my hard work. Sounds weird but that's how I feel.
myshirt wrote: » Humans need to be loved, fed, and understood. You're fooling yourself believing it is natural and healthy remaining single. You need companionship.
madmaggie wrote: » Don't feel weird, IamtheWalrus, I'm just the same! Having slogged for almost 20 years in a crap job to get a half decent life, I think to myself "hell, no way am I providing someone else with a nice ready made mortgage free home".
GritBiscuit wrote: » Meh, loneliest I've ever felt was in a relationship. I think it's all about balance, and having needs met and being happy with your situation in order to be healthy, rather than coupledom bringing inherent health. Different strokes and all that...
pumpkin4life wrote: » Asshole (possible projection from a lad who wants a giant farm with a supermodel wan with ten kids) post coming: If your life is meaningless/unfulfilling a lot of the time then sometimes putting yourself forward for kids is the only way to do it. There's this weird sad/unfocused lost vibe from a lot of people who don't have children past a certain age. They're easy enough to spot actually, it's fùcking weird in my opinion. I would say that 90% or so men are meant to/are far more suited to being married with kids than being single and 99% of women are far more suited to being married with kids than being single. It's fùcking sad in a way. Wans my age obsessed with the career in marketing and its dawning on them that its other people, not some quota or number that makes your life mean something. Sometimes as well its a rationalization for being shy/physically unattractive etc as well.
neonsofa wrote: » Few years back I was talking to a neighbour about his daughter, i had seen her in the shop briefly and she told me she had found work and was in a new apartment; I said something along the lines of "I'm delighted for her, shes doing really well" and he said "hmm but still no husband". I was actually taken aback by it. And it wasn't out of malice or judgement, more concern I think? She was creating this lovely life for herself, seemed really happy and content but he could only focus on the lack of husband. It's similar to when I mention saving for a house/ my career or something, and (it's generally older women) they say "ah sure a man will come along and provide for you, you needn't worry about that", as if it is a given that I want a person to not only be in a relationship with, but to also provide for me. I sometimes worry that I have become too settled in providing for myself, in that it makes me anxious thinking about sharing finances or buying a home with somebody else and becoming dependent on them in a way, but financial stability from a partner seems to be where the concern comes from when people mention my being single.
Ms Doubtfire1 wrote: » uhm LAT relation all the way. Sharing my home with someone constantly.... nononono can do. I do judge though..usually married couples..with sympathy.