Fighting Tao wrote: » Depending on he pub. You could easily spend less than half that (€68) over 2 nights in a pub like O'Reillys, Tara Street and have 10 pints a night. It really depends on the pub.
ceadaoin. wrote: » OP said a night out in the local would be 60-80€
Murrisk wrote: » Any pub with pints for less than E5 in Dublin city centre (E68 / 20 pints) are generally to be avoided. Even down the country, you'd be talking E4-E4.50 at least for a pint.
Chuchote wrote: » So, taking eur70 a night as an average, that's eur7,280 a year.
Murrisk wrote: » @ Fighting Tao, can't quote yet, you mentioned O'Reillys of Tara Street. You, in a post, gave the approximate price of pints in O'Reilly's of Tara Street, a Dublin CC pub. Edit: Oh right, misread your post. I've been to O'Reilly's, it's a tad rough around the edges. Nothing to recommend, really, and in a pretty dodge area.
Little Kingdom wrote: » Rounds like that are retarded.
Chuchote wrote: » So, taking eur70 a night as an average, that's eur7,280 a year. (Boards.ie, when are you going to fix your scripting problem?)
ForestFire wrote: » So now we know he drinks 10pints a night??? and they are €10 each??
Chuchote wrote: » OP said her husband spent from 60 to 80 euros a night two nights a week, as I understand it.
Fighting Tao wrote: » One method of curbing someone's drinking is to go out with them. So the husband is in the pub regardless on Friday after work. If both partners were in the pub then he would most likely slow down his drinking and leave when the wife wanted to leave. I know myself if I'm out with mates I'd usually be drinking faster and more than if I'm out with my wife. It's as if we fall into a rythm and in rounds. So one person is finished their pint there is an unspoken pressure for the next in line to buy a round to get it. Then the others finishe up their dribk quicker because they have 2 drinks in front of them.
ForestFire wrote: » She did not say this directly, she was talking about herself going out at the time and maybe talking for 2 going out?? ...the point is none of us know the facts so we should not come up with figure of over €7000 a year as Gospel I am not defending the husband and there probably needs to be some compromise, but I don't see how this helps the OP
Mr.Wemmick wrote: » However, as it has been accurately stated by a few posters that if he is hungover to the extent he is, that it is fair to say there are quite a number of pints consumed on his nights out. Add that to the fact he is out every weekend Fri & Sat, it is a safe bet he is a well-practiced drinker. I worked in a pub for all my student years, and more besides, and know what a good drinker (and not necessarily a problem drinker) puts away on an average night. It doesn't work out on the cheaper side of these estimations.
ForestFire wrote: » Thank you for highlighting my exact point perfectly. Please tell how you can combine all these words together.... ....accurately stated by a few posters...(so not the OP) ...fair to say... ...it is a safe bet... ...I worked...and know what a good drinker..(so again not the OP's Husband) You do not have one Fact relate to the OP situation in this post, but sure, posters said, safe bet's, fair to say and I know...
Mr.Wemmick wrote: » there is no word fact in my post.. pedantics clearly get you excited.
ForestFire wrote: » You responded to my post about facts....and started yours with "accurately state" before listing off more conjecture... And then follow on to assume I'm clearly excited? If you want to forget the subject of the previous post and deflect it onto me fine, I have made my point.
Mr.Wemmick wrote: » I did not highlight the word fact in your post, you did.. Accurately stated refers to his lengthy hangovers resulting from lots of drink - read it again. .
Armchair Andy wrote: » Would you consider just buying a crate of beer for the fridge this Friday OP? When he sees it just suggest you felt like having a beer yourself
pickarooney wrote: » I feel like crap for two days after 7 pints. I'm 40 now and just can't be up to it. But sure I'm just some weirdo anomaly who can't drink like a man.
Alma Weak Stabilizer wrote: » The term hangover is fairly broad though and not really an exact science. You might feel a bit groggy after 7 or 8 pints and some might call this a mild hangover but it would in no way stop you getting up and going about your day while on the other end of the scale a severe hangover could mean good for absolutely nothing until late afternoon and getting sick.
Chuchote wrote: Please don't do this, mockingjay. It's the royal road to alcoholism, drinking along with a heavy drinker to moderate their behaviour.
Armchair Andy wrote: » No it's not. Quote the full context of my post if you're going to take issue.
Alma Weak Stabilizer wrote: » Hence its not only variable meaning of terms like hungover but also how people are effected. I'm early 30's so not a young lad by any means and 7 or 8 pints would be fairly quiet few mid week pints or a "few" pints after work on a Friday to me. Wouldn't really consider it a night out. Might feel a bit groggy after it if I had to be up early but i'd have it shook of in no time. 7 or 8 pints would only be getting warmed up in a proper session.
pilly wrote: Suggesting a "crate" of beer was quite excessive in my opinion.