ERG89 wrote: » They aren't cause Matt spent his money on retaining the rights to it, he's not going to hand that over to WWE to make money off. The delete chants are louder than basically any other crowd reactions on Raw.
Monokne wrote: » Meltzer responded to a fan on Twitter saying that with the mainstream pub the story is getting, he anticipates there will be some type of resolution. IE they won't be able to just ignore it and move on.
beakerjoe wrote: » Id say this is going down the legal route. Mauro isnt saying anything, his friends arent giving any details either and Ill say we wont hear anything until Mauro's contract is up in August. Dave has said we might not hear anything on this story for months and I think he is implying we wont hear anything until Mauro is out of contract. I do wonder will/or can WWE try keep him under contract after August in similar way they kept Rey Mysterio on for longer.
beakerjoe wrote: » In realtion to the younger guys, new recruits, WWE is going to be putting a lot of time and energy into them if they are to succeed, so if they don't have it mentally or physically, it really is best to see what they are made of to a certain degree.
briany wrote: » How a wrestler earns respect in the locker room is another matter, but in all the shoot interviews I've watched, I've gleaned that respect is fostered through respect shown. You say hello, you shake hands, you especially show consideration to the veterans. Then you show you can do your job. The breed of wrestler who actively takes it upon themselves to victimise new talent appears to be relatively rare, and they're often quite divisive figures in the business and among fans (e.g. New Jack and Ole Anderson).
Lord TSC wrote: » Per the Wretling Observer At press time, neither Ranallo nor WWE have made any statements on the case past WWE saying Ranallo is under contract through 8/12. Ranallo’s contract doesn’t allow him to give unauthorized interviews on WWE and the belief is that WWE is working hard to come to a settlement that would include an agreement that he not publicly talk about the issue
briany wrote: » In the hypothetical scenario that Ranallo was unduly vicimised by JBL and/or other parties within the company, he has plenty of other avenues to pursue in his career, and his departure from the WWE would very much be WWE's loss.
beakerjoe wrote: » A guy like Coach, would strike me as a man who would be similar to Mauro in terms of being considered an outsider when initially joining WWE and would be a prime candidate to be hazed/bullied IMO. Hes mentioned a few times of what he went through in WWE (being ripped as he puts it) and believes its fine and he comes across like a man they would push to his limits.
LeeJM wrote: » I would say some kind of settlement is likely with some $$$ going to Mauro to never speak publicly about it as well as early release from his contract and whatever non compete clause waived. And if Mauros lawyers are really good maybe a clause that within a certain period of time JBL is removed from the company after Mauro has gone. Mauro can then go to work for NJPW/AXS again or UFC if thats on the table. I just cant see this going the legal route as it would cost Mauro a tonne personally and put off perspective employers while we all know how good Jerry McDevitt is when it comes to defending WWE in any legal situation.
Monokne wrote: » This would be the same Jonathan Coachman who said this in 2014: "Basically, Jerry Brisco came up to me in 2001 in Fayetteville, North Carolina, and he said he wanted me to run a football pool. $10 to pick all the games, and everybody did it. And I started on a Tuesday, it was a Smackdown taping, I'll never forget it. I had my own room I did interviews in, and all the sudden two cops show up. They were very serious, and said I understand you're running a gambling pool. You sold one to one of our undercover cops here. It's a felony in North Carolina and we're going to have to take you in. So we're walking down the hallway, and we stop in front of Vince's office, and they said we should probably let him know because you're not going to be here for a while. We walk in and it's Vince, Triple H, Stephanie, The Rock, Kevin Dunn and Jerry Brisco. I should have known that, with Jerry in the room, something was going on, but I was so terrified because I was 26 years old. The real cops proceeded to tell Vince they've caught me in a gambling pool and we need to take him downtown. Vince got in my face, and he was an inch away from my nose. He was cursing, telling me my priorities were bad, and spending company time to run a gambling pool. This entire riff lasted 45 minutes. At the end of the office bit, the officer said it was $1,500 to get me out, and Vince said F-no, he's on his own. They handcuffed me, and I asked if there was anything I could put over my face. Vince threw me a pair of sweaty gym shorts that got stuck on my face. I walked out of the office and the first person I see is The Undertaker. He looks at me with shock, and it was so real because no one else was in on it except those people in the office. They walked me out, and all the fans could see me and they drove me about a mile down the road, and got a call on the radio that they had to come back to pick up something. They turn around, come back, and everyone's there with Vince in front of everybody laughing their asses off. Greatest rip in the history of the business, and for about 10 minutes I literally walked to a place in the building and started crying. I thought my career was over. I thought how can I tell my dad I got fired over a $10 football pool." If I went to work and your co-workers played this prank and you and you ended up spending ten minutes hiding in a corner of the office and crying, I would not consider that 'fine' and nor, I feel comfortable saying, would most people. In the real world that's bullying. Coachman probably has Stockholm Syndrome from being there so long, and he's also got to hedge his bets because ESPN is cutting back on staff so much at the moment that he may be looking for work very soon.
CSF wrote: » F*ck that ****. Ones worth is not determined by how much you behave like a lout. And dont forget Undertaker gets far too much of a free pass on this, despite him showing previously to be just as nasty a Neanderthal person deep down.
Chain Smoker wrote: » What're the undertaker stories? Beyond the kangaroo court silliness, I mean. I've always thought he was more like the huge guy in a school that thinks he's cool as f*ck but is actually just a bit oblivious to how afraid everyone is of him. Quite thin skinned and a bit weird about his adherence to the code (all the nonsense about shaking hands and the like). He always comes across as a bit of a loser in promos and in his general idea of what cool is, but I haven't seen anything in the way of bully vibes.
Neil3030 wrote: » Losing a lot of respect for Cornette, given his views on this. His general point is along the lines of 'why didn't Mauro threaten Bradshaw with something like a tire iron to get him to stop'. :rolleyes:
Ben Gadot wrote: » That coach gambling pool story is just horrific. .