Junkyard Tom wrote: » In all my years on Earth I can confidently say anyone I've known who had 'mental health issues' are loathe to avoid confrontations with people they don't know rather than seeking them out.
__Alex__ wrote: » +1, especially as they already won. She looked like an eejit and had everyone present laughing at her. She flounced off looking thoroughly silly. She did not come out of the situation on top. So what was to be gained from uploading it?
Widdershins wrote: » I personally think she's probably unwell and out of control.
yoke wrote: » Widdershins, the clip does not warrant medical investigation of any "mental issue". You have not been able to give specific examples of exactly what behaviour warrants medical investigation and what medical issue you suspect (because the examples don't exist), despite having been asked many times, so I'll rest my argument. Also you've displayed a profound lack of understanding of pretty much everything on the subject so I'm going to stop arguing with you at this point - especially the bit about heroin addicts. You're making claims as if they're fact, when you don't have a clue about the subject. I'll leave you with this last thing to think about - Is the person a heroin addict because they had psychiatric problems to begin with, or did they somehow get hooked on heroin without knowing it, and it caused psychiatric problems, which would go away as soon as they kicked the habit? There's no easy answer, it's just a thought exercise, but hopefully you will see that complex problems don't have simple solutions. You can't always solve heroin addiction by "cold turkey for 3 weeks", and you can't solve "people being assholes" by ignoring them and being nice to them
__Alex__ wrote: » Well, it's nice to know that the above people you talk about, you didn't appear to believe, hence the inverted commas. It's also telling that you say pseudo-science.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » So you are diagnosing her on the internet. We don't need to explain away all negative behaviour by giving it a diagnosis. Giving a 'diagnosis' to a person who's horrible is excusing their behaviour. Do you agree that some people are just nasty fuckers or can all nasty behaviour be attributed to 'mental health issues'?
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Maybe I'm suffering from ODD?
Widdershins wrote: » I used to think some people are just nasty. I now believe it goes back to something in their life and it can't always be fixed or treated, so they become 'just' nasty people.
__Alex__ wrote: » I'm sure a psychiatrist would be happy to talk to you about that. :cool:
Junkyard Tom wrote: » If your only tool is a hammer then every 'problem' looks like a nail.
__Alex__ wrote: » Like I said, chat to a psych.
IAnd it's why people eat this shit up too. "Great, someone I can feel superior to!" And on it goes.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » No thanks. If they require my advice I'll charge by the hour. I think you might be suffering from ODD.
Outlaw Pete wrote: This just in: She believes in mermaids!
Outlaw Pete wrote: » This just in: She believes in mermaids! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n0rqJMI9W4
Junkyard Tom wrote: » You've got PSDD I'm afraid. Pseudo Scientific Diagnosis Disorder. Symptoms: The compulsion to explain away all anti-social behaviour as a medical condition or a disease. The sufferer of PSDD just can't accept that some people are nasty ****ers in favour of believing they can be fixed or it's something society did to them. See how that works Widdershins?
Widdershins wrote: » I'm well aware it happens, I've had it happen to me, it was my boyfriend who pointed out what the other woman's problem was. She was grossly overweight.I was paying her for professional services. She wasn't tearing her hair out or rocking in a corner muttering gibberish so no, she didn't 'look' ill. If you need therapy you're mentally ill (not necessarily that you need to be diagnosed with something, but at that time your mental health needs treatment to get you feeling well again for whatever reason). There's a huge spectrum of mentally illnesses. Needing therapy for something on that scale-or a phobia, for example- isn't the same as having a long term mental illness but it's still a state of mental illness. It'd be unusual for anyone to go through their entire life and never be mentally unwell at some point, in a minor way. They might not require treatment though. I'm beginning to see this is a lack of understanding of what mentally ill means. I might not need a bandage, but not major surgery for a sprained ankle. In that case I'd still be injured. Or I might not need so much as antibiotics for a head cold but I'm still physically ill. I almost feel like I should apologise for saying what I said about therapy and mental illness, but thats because of the perception of it I'm getting from the thread...it's not a dirty word or an insult.
Widdershins wrote: » What was that someone was saying about uploading videos of people for sport. Does that seem like someone who is compos mentis?
Billy86 wrote: » Yeah, feel kind of bad about starting the thread now - she really doesn't seem well (who is she even talking to there?)
whoopsadoodles wrote: » What you're saying about going to a therapist isn't true at all. To use your physical examples. When pregnant you get a myriad of tests throughout in order to ensure you don't become ill. When running a marathon you go regularly to a physio to ensure you don't get injured. If you have someone in your family with certain diseases you go to a doctor to see if you are carrying the same gene so that you don't get the same disease. If you've been through a traumatic even in your life you might go to a therapist to ensure that you don't become mentally ill. Saying that anyone who has been to a therapist has a mental illness is quite ill informed and actually serves to dismiss mental health issues.
pilly wrote: » Suddenly an end to all discussion that's she's just an evil **** who deserves everything she gets?
K.Flyer wrote: » Believing in Mermaids, Angels, Aliens, Gods, Ghosts or Goblins is not an excuse, or gives someone a free licence, to scream a torrent of abuse at someone in the way she did.
Widdershins wrote: » Yes, I agree that it could be preventative after a trauma and probably other reasons I can't think of, off the top of my head. But I didn't say they have an actual mental illness that needs diagnosis/treatment. I am sorry to have used the wording that I did, it was clumsy. Personally if I had been through a trauma and it didn't affect me at all at the time or soon after, I'd be impressed with myself or my good luck but I'd probably just be in shock and not feeling it.It does make sense to want to prevent future re-emergence of the trauma in the form of an illness or something. I see a trauma to the mind the same as one to the body in that it is an injury to the mind's wellbeing. But not an actual mental illness. And I have had traumas and while I went the route of medication, I could have gone for therapy instead, but personally I considered my mental health affected negatively-I wasn't ill in a clinical way but something had happened to damage my mental wellbeing. I would class that as me being ill/unwell... even though it's not an accurate way of describing it as it's not a clinical illness.
pilly wrote: » NOBODY has said it's an excuse. For once and for all, my argument is that putting the video up on line was done as a bit of fun or revenge or whatever they want to call it by the couple and they should be ashamed of themselves for doing so. NOBODY has said her behaviour was acceptable or normal. The couple had every right to defend themselves but they do not have every right to possibly ruin someone's life by posting that **** online. The ignorance on here regarding mental illness has astounded me honestly.
silverharp wrote: » the couple did nothing wrong , they videoed something for their own protection and took the view that the woman was unhinged and just being nasty. we live in the social media age equivalent of "an armed society is a polite society"