Means Of Escape wrote: » "Armchair speculation " has been correct in many respects since the beginning .
Discodog wrote: » That's virtually a hover or flare to land. I wonder if it's accurate ?
TomOnBoard wrote: » I've just seen that screenshot :eek: for the first time. Just wondering, why are you asking if it's accurate? However, in all the stuff I've read since 14th March, I'm asking myself how I haven't seen this previously? Could it be that its authenticity is in question?
elastico wrote: » When I posted it earlier this morning it was swiftly censored and deleted without explanation. It doesn't sit well with the party line around here. Nobody on pprune has questioned its authenticity. Its pretty compelling evidence.
kerry cow wrote: » Does it really matter how it happened at this stage . It's over , two crew lost to sea .Two crew recovered for their families .its all a terrible happening .many trawler families have suffered the same faith in their line of duty .its over 21 days at this stage, time to park it ,stand down and move on .It's all a big media hype at this stage .let the families greeve and heal .
spaceHopper wrote: » No sign of the missing crew must be very hard for the families. Wonder if it's worth doing a second land search of the island.
[*]
irishgeo wrote: » Court cases really?
kippy wrote: » In fairness, there have been coastal searches ongoing by numerous resources since the accident and even more so over the past two weekends when the weather has been relatively good for this. There have been smaller boats and lifeboats as well as the available SAR helicopter searching coastline from Achill to as far as the coast North of Killybegs. The same today from what I could see. It is indeed bad news that no sign of the crew was found today. Very tough on the families and all concerned.
TomOnBoard wrote: » Mmmm, I dunno! It doesn't seem to have been mentioned at all IIRC, other than in a few posts around then. I would have thought that, as it appears to be very compelling on the face of it, it would have attracted an enormous level of detailed discussion. Something seems off to me.
12gauge dave wrote: » It was said here yesterday that r118 landed on blackrock since incident is this 100% true?
JimWinters wrote: » Around 4pm on the 15th or 16th EI-ICG travelled from Blacksod directly to Blackrock where it either hovered for several minutes or landed. It returned to Blacksod and landed. Moments later there were pictures tweeted with a number of people removing a section of 116's tail from the ramp. This section could have been winched up but looking at the effort made to remove it, it's likely it was loaded on the ground. Can't publish the pic unfortunately sorry...
Gadgetman496 wrote: » Is this the picture?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Huge difference between highly qualified professional air accident investigators and people on the internet bashing their heads off a keyboard in an effort to be nearly right in one of their theories. Huge difference.
Gadgetman496 wrote: » Well this is a good shot of R116 so what might that piece have been part of? The white with the green stripe is near the tail section.
Cianmcliam wrote: » If it is then it doesn't look like part of the tail section. The colour scheme is only on the main cabin area. R117 landed on Inishkea a few times and along the coast of Belmullet so that part could have come from anywhere.
Cianmcliam wrote: » It looks like the rear ramp.