12gauge dave wrote: » It was said here yesterday that r118 landed on blackrock since incident is this 100% true?
TomOnBoard wrote: » Mmmm, I dunno! It doesn't seem to have been mentioned at all IIRC, other than in a few posts around then. I would have thought that, as it appears to be very compelling on the face of it, it would have attracted an enormous level of detailed discussion. Something seems off to me.
kippy wrote: » In fairness, there have been coastal searches ongoing by numerous resources since the accident and even more so over the past two weekends when the weather has been relatively good for this. There have been smaller boats and lifeboats as well as the available SAR helicopter searching coastline from Achill to as far as the coast North of Killybegs. The same today from what I could see. It is indeed bad news that no sign of the crew was found today. Very tough on the families and all concerned.
irishgeo wrote: » Court cases really?
[*]
spaceHopper wrote: » No sign of the missing crew must be very hard for the families. Wonder if it's worth doing a second land search of the island.
kerry cow wrote: » Does it really matter how it happened at this stage . It's over , two crew lost to sea .Two crew recovered for their families .its all a terrible happening .many trawler families have suffered the same faith in their line of duty .its over 21 days at this stage, time to park it ,stand down and move on .It's all a big media hype at this stage .let the families greeve and heal .
elastico wrote: » When I posted it earlier this morning it was swiftly censored and deleted without explanation. It doesn't sit well with the party line around here. Nobody on pprune has questioned its authenticity. Its pretty compelling evidence.
TomOnBoard wrote: » I've just seen that screenshot :eek: for the first time. Just wondering, why are you asking if it's accurate? However, in all the stuff I've read since 14th March, I'm asking myself how I haven't seen this previously? Could it be that its authenticity is in question?
Discodog wrote: » That's virtually a hover or flare to land. I wonder if it's accurate ?
Means Of Escape wrote: » "Armchair speculation " has been correct in many respects since the beginning .
Discodog wrote: » That's virtually a hover or flare to land. I wonder if it's accurate?
Gadgetman496 wrote: »
elastico wrote: » Last recorded speed was 9Knts. Edit Can't seem to load picture. Its in the thread below page 16.http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/592162-sar-s-92-missing-ireland-16.html
CardinalJ wrote: » I genuinely laughed at that. EDIT - I'm finding it funnier as time goes on.
TomOnBoard wrote: » If that is the case, why would they have still been flying at 90 knots?